Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Someone start a petition to demand m$ make a brown version of the new Zunes. Then we can all point and laugh again. Ah..... so many great poo jokes, thanks for the memories m$.
 
Don't know if this has been mentioned, the WiFi syncing is not automatic unless the Zune is plugged into a charging source. You can always do a manual WiFi sync without a power source.

This seems to almost miss the point of WiFi Syncing. If I have to manually start it or dock it to a power source, I might as well just dock it.
 
I think they look great and that's a very good thing. The iPod needs some healthy competition. It drives companies to make better products and drops prices.
 
Microsoft may have intelligent engineers but their upper management is full of morons. The people who run the company are still stuck in the mid 80's to mid 90's Microsoft strategy mindset. That strategy was to destroy all competition by whichever means possible (including unethical and illegal tactics, of which they've been found guilty and in the EU fined over $600 million), using FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt) to discourage people from adopting competing technologies and products, and last but certainly not least, copying existing (and much better) technologies and products and killing off the originals (for instance, DR-DOS was the original and better DOS than Microsoft's).

If you look at Microsoft's products, they have not been successful (read: profitable) with anything except for Windows and Office. In the 90's there was a time when they really were the best option on the PC, because their competitors made lots of stupid mistakes (Apple included). Back then their success was considered deserved (even Steve Jobs said "they've earned their success.. for the most part", circa 1996) However, the only reason they're still dominant in Windows/Office is because of the anti-competitive tactics they've used to create and maintain a monopoly.

Microsoft will probably never make any really good, original products until their current upper management is replaced. Right now the people who run the company don't give half a rat's ass about consumers. This is why their products suck, not because they don't have good engineers. The current management thinks that the way to make a profitable product is to copy something that's successful and then push the original company out of the market, leaving MS as the only option. Of course it won't work with Apple and it won't work with Sony, or any other major company. But that doesn't stop them from trying and hemorrhaging tons of money.

This is why nobody should support Microsoft. They might make products that somewhat resemble what Apple makes, and even sell them cheaper, but these products are subsidized by the monopoly sales of Windows and Office. The Zune is just a poor attempt to undercut Apple, in a desperate move by MS to become profitable in something other than Windows and Office, which they know won't be monopoly cash cows forever.
Your forgot professional division. Server 2003, SQL server and MSDN now it's about a third of their revenue today. Actually you're right. The tactics of Microsoft is to copy something, and bring 80% of performance of this product for only 30% of the price. In my opinion it's very important for the market. No matter who invents something, the matter is who can bring it to the market and make it affordable. Apple invented PC but MS and IBM brought it to average consumer. Without tens of millions housewives who could use their win95 and win98 machines web still was an experimental toy.Now we need someone, probably Microsoft again, who will copy iPhone and will bring it to the market in normal, unlocked and unlimited way
 
Um, what's wrong with iRiver?

i'm not sure about the actual device, although i've heard it's pretty good, but the name just stucks, it's just like what people say about M$ it's just trying to milk the sucess of the iPod, i HATE products that put an "i" in front of the name because they no it's what apple does, it's like their little signature, it may not be a great signature but it is something that you associate with apple.
So when a company uses the "i" it's like they're just trying to milk the sucess of apple instead of making up their own thing.
 
1.2 million zunes sold. Seems like a lot more than I expected. How does that compare with the iPod?

iPods sold around 10m in each of the last two quarters, and 21m in the last holiday/Christmas quarter. Over the last 12 months, iPods have outsold Zunes by a ratio of 42 to 1.

Of course, there are cheaper iPods, so the comparison isn't exact; but really, Sandisk is the true number 2 we should all be discussing (except that it's just so much fun to insult Microsoft, isn't it?:D)
 
iPods sold around 10m in each of the last two quarters, and 21m in the last holiday/Christmas quarter. Over the last 12 months, iPods have outsold Zunes by a ratio of 42 to 1.

Of course, there are cheaper iPods, so the comparison isn't exact; but really, Sandisk is the true number 2 we should all be discussing (except that it's just so much fun to insult Microsoft, isn't it?:D)
I suppose, Microsoft, if was aware of your existence, will think about you bad way, too
 
i'm not sure about the actual device, although i've heard it's pretty good, but the name just stucks, it's just like what people say about M$ it's just trying to milk the sucess of the iPod, i HATE products that put an "i" in front of the name because they no it's what apple does, it's like their little signature, it may not be a great signature but it is something that you associate with apple.
So when a company uses the "i" it's like they're just trying to milk the sucess of apple instead of making up their own thing.

iRiver actually predates the iPod. First one came out in 2000. Still hold 50% share in South Korea, where they come from.

However, they may have been seeking to copy the iMac moniker.
 
The zune

Its another M$ scam.

You start a crappy 'zune division', you pump tons of cash into it, which all disappears into 'development and research and set-up' and this enables you to get cash out of the company, ie rip off the shareholders.

The zune, for example, IS a toshiba gigabeat, slightly warmed over.
These million zunes somehow are 'sold' - but we never see the frickin things...

I dont think most people realise what a bunch of stinking thieves the management at M$ are.

As for their stupid products - I presume its posted here so we can have fun slagging them off.
If I had a zune as a gift, I would set fire to it and chuck it off a cliff and watch it crash and burn.

If I actually purchased a zune I would seek immediate psychiatric help.

M$ represent All that is bad in our world, the lies, the ugly side of humanity.

They lose billions of dollars every year on their weird 'products' and crap like MSN and Xbox - its a frickin scam, fer crying out loud!
 
i'm not sure about the actual device, although i've heard it's pretty good, but the name just stucks, it's just like what people say about M$ it's just trying to milk the sucess of the iPod, i HATE products that put an "i" in front of the name because they no it's what apple does, it's like their little signature, it may not be a great signature but it is something that you associate with apple.
So when a company uses the "i" it's like they're just trying to milk the sucess of apple instead of making up their own thing.

Actually the first iRiver was released in Nov 2000 whereas the iPod was released in Nov 2001. So the iPod wasn't first in the name game for the PMP market. You could defend Apple saying that the iMac and iBook had been out before the iRiver. All I care about in the end is that there's no iZune.

Edit: some one beat me to it :(
 
i'm not sure about the actual device, although i've heard it's pretty good, but the name just stucks, it's just like what people say about M$ it's just trying to milk the sucess of the iPod, i HATE products that put an "i" in front of the name because they no it's what apple does, it's like their little signature, it may not be a great signature but it is something that you associate with apple.
So when a company uses the "i" it's like they're just trying to milk the sucess of apple instead of making up their own thing.

This might come as a shock to you, but iRiver got it's name in 1999, long before iPod... Why do you automatically assume that if something is called iSomething, it's automatically a copy of iPod?
 
The new flash models look like copies of the old-generation nano's, bet Microsoft isn't happy about the recent design change, they probably couldn't change it at such a late stage.

The red model doesn't appear to be a (red) model, which isn't very good. I think they could of got more market share by introducing it as a (red) model supporting the AIDS charities.

As for the new controller, looks intuitive actually, I'd like to try it out as it looks a lot smarter than a dummy scroll wheel.
 
This might come as a shock to you, but iRiver got it's name in 1999, long before iPod... Why do you automatically assume that if something is called iSomething, it's automatically a copy of iPod?
Indeed. I owned BMW i330 in 1992
 
Now we need someone, probably Microsoft again, who will copy iPhone and will bring it to the market in normal, unlocked and unlimited way

LOL! Oh yeah, I cant WAIT to get a zune-touch-zphone running vista!
That will be a REAL pleasure.....!

You some kind of masochist? We just got the very first cell phone that ISNT rubbish, and you want the IDIOTS at M$ to copy it?

Sometimes I wonder what freakin planet some of you guys live on.....

The Phone is great because it runs OSX - thats the whole thing - OSX.

You see, its a BETTER OS than freakin vista.

All the OTHER phones run linux and symbian and M$ and they are all CRAP - or do you like to spend an hour sending an email from your phone and then finding that it sent the attached photo in 12 pieces (motorola RAzr for example) I kid you not.

You think M$ could make an iPhone with all the brilliance thats inside it?

NOT A FREAKIN HOPE IN HELL.

They just spent SEVEN YEARS on vista and its JUNK - see the logic here?

Two years on the zune, (and it was ALREADY designed for them), and its only as good as a 5 year old iPod.

Yeah, I know - you just love your N95 or your whatever it is.
So why do you need a M$ copy of an iPhone?

Why are we all so DUMB?

Its like the Bush madness - he says they have WMD - they dont, but they still attack and BILLIONS of bucks disappear - gee, just like M$.

See ANY kind of connection yet?

Hold on to your iPhone - the freakin BARBARIANS are at the gate with their bloody zunes, and their iphone copies, and they hate intelligence and beauty.....
 
The tactics of Microsoft is to copy something, and bring 80% of performance of this product for only 30% of the price. In my opinion it's very important for the market. No matter who invents something, the matter is who can bring it to the market and make it affordable. Apple invented PC but MS and IBM brought it to average consumer. Without tens of millions housewives who could use their win95 and win98 machines web still was an experimental toy.Now we need someone, probably Microsoft again, who will copy iPhone and will bring it to the market in normal, unlocked and unlimited way

Look, I know you think Microsoft are jolly good and all that, but their tactics really don't add to the sum total of human knowledge or advance the technological revolution in any way. They simply use their immense profits from long-established Windows and Office monopolies (effectively a tax on the sale of all non-Mac computers) to distort real markets.

No other company would have been able to waste so much ($5 billion, for Gawd's sake!) on the Xbox, for example – simply to try and damage Sony's Playstation. They're trying the same ploy with the Zune.

Microsoft never 'open things up', as you seem to imply. Their entire modus operandi is to close competitors down. :(
 
basically the same

id rather not be on the fence here but basically they are two products (ipod and zune) that fulfill the same purpose. both are not really that good for watching video but the zune is better as it has a larger screen.

both use software that is propriety but the ipod is useable on both osx and windows. both are targeted at the mass market but both can sound glorious with the right hardware (amp and good headphones or line out with ipod).

in any case, the zune is not the best looking player on the market but it is a good product with a great introduction model that except for battery life was great: it sounded wonderful.

both companies have heaps to learn however as they are both on the top of their respective niches and in some ways offter less than the competition. that said, itunes smacks windows media easily in every way.

*** IRIVER ***

having used some of their products, they sound fine if you never ever use expensive sensitive iem phones like um2 or e500. they are the worst hissers i have heard. i have a cowon d2 that was proclaimed by many to not hiss and it is the last reason i actually sold my um2 - i could not be bothered by carrying around pmp, amp, ic and phones.

i think iriver is on the last legs of what was a glorious empire years ago. it has not produced audiophile in years now and even those audiophile hissed like a snake garden.
 
Apple needs competition

Like in this post:
I was a pretty hardcore Mac user for years. I owned and operated OSXWORLD.COM. I wrote tons of tutorials for Apple's FCP and DVD Studio Pro. Even published a book on Studio Pro.

But a few years ago after building a PC to run After Effects, I started to use the PC more and more. I like the freedom building my own machine affords. Something Apple won't allow us to do easily.

...

Give the Zune an honest look, unless you're afraid you might like it more than what you have now. Gosh, that would just sour the koolaid now wouldn't it.

-Alex

we see, using a Zune is possible.

Apple is setting the standard in the market for electronic music. And in a perspective of five to ten years the market of the HW media CD / DVD will shrink to the size comparable of the venyl market today. And the market will be grown 5 to 10 times in this time. But what will happen to Apple when there is no real competition out there?

1: Apple would become lazy. Like in some other posts about MS is stated, at some point management methods will freeze and 10 years later the company will be looked at as a Dinosaur.

2. In business companies live with and depend on competition. With the competition you play the cat and mouse game. Sometime your shares rock, sometimes the other shares give more profit. There will be fans on this side and fans on that side. So be it.
But as a monopolist, you will loose your fans. The monopolist haters will get stronger and stronger. You will be seen as the devil. And than you will be the mouse being hunted by the Federal Trade Commission and the EU commission. Do we remember the Euro 500 Mill. fine for Microsoft in 2004?
At least the hunter will get their pray.
But what does that mean? Is this correct? In some extend yes. Having a monopolist will NOT force business development. Having a monopolist does not force technical innovation.
(In this case - believe me or not - MS is VERY happy that there is Apple and OS X. They really need it.)

So, I wish the other players in the digital music market also a little bit of luck and may their market share be around 40% at least all together. This would give Apple the market leader position, huge profits, and the possibility to define the standards. And EU commission and the others would keep quiet.

And I'm indeed a happy Mac and iPod user and hopefully a happy iPhone user when it arrives in Germany

Confidemus
 
Looks nice, the price point won't help it though. Had it been 50 dollars cheaper it might have been in a position to do something.


Please, can we have a ban on the use of "m$", it's childish and reeks of insecurity.
 
These have nice features for a device a few years old.

No wonder Apple have nothing to worry about.
 
The look pretty decent, certainly not ugly.

I think they are competitive and may do quite well.

We'll see.
 
i wouldnt buy one, but it looks good. i'm kinda sick of all these iPod derivitives tho..... big screen, roundish click wheel...blah blah....:rolleyes:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.