Your forgot professional division. Server 2003, SQL server and MSDN now it's about a third of their revenue today. Actually you're right. The tactics of Microsoft is to copy something, and bring 80% of performance of this product for only 30% of the price. In my opinion it's very important for the market. No matter who invents something, the matter is who can bring it to the market and make it affordable. Apple invented PC but MS and IBM brought it to average consumer. Without tens of millions housewives who could use their win95 and win98 machines web still was an experimental toy.Now we need someone, probably Microsoft again, who will copy iPhone and will bring it to the market in normal, unlocked and unlimited wayMicrosoft may have intelligent engineers but their upper management is full of morons. The people who run the company are still stuck in the mid 80's to mid 90's Microsoft strategy mindset. That strategy was to destroy all competition by whichever means possible (including unethical and illegal tactics, of which they've been found guilty and in the EU fined over $600 million), using FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt) to discourage people from adopting competing technologies and products, and last but certainly not least, copying existing (and much better) technologies and products and killing off the originals (for instance, DR-DOS was the original and better DOS than Microsoft's).
If you look at Microsoft's products, they have not been successful (read: profitable) with anything except for Windows and Office. In the 90's there was a time when they really were the best option on the PC, because their competitors made lots of stupid mistakes (Apple included). Back then their success was considered deserved (even Steve Jobs said "they've earned their success.. for the most part", circa 1996) However, the only reason they're still dominant in Windows/Office is because of the anti-competitive tactics they've used to create and maintain a monopoly.
Microsoft will probably never make any really good, original products until their current upper management is replaced. Right now the people who run the company don't give half a rat's ass about consumers. This is why their products suck, not because they don't have good engineers. The current management thinks that the way to make a profitable product is to copy something that's successful and then push the original company out of the market, leaving MS as the only option. Of course it won't work with Apple and it won't work with Sony, or any other major company. But that doesn't stop them from trying and hemorrhaging tons of money.
This is why nobody should support Microsoft. They might make products that somewhat resemble what Apple makes, and even sell them cheaper, but these products are subsidized by the monopoly sales of Windows and Office. The Zune is just a poor attempt to undercut Apple, in a desperate move by MS to become profitable in something other than Windows and Office, which they know won't be monopoly cash cows forever.
Um, what's wrong with iRiver?
1.2 million zunes sold. Seems like a lot more than I expected. How does that compare with the iPod?
I suppose, Microsoft, if was aware of your existence, will think about you bad way, tooiPods sold around 10m in each of the last two quarters, and 21m in the last holiday/Christmas quarter. Over the last 12 months, iPods have outsold Zunes by a ratio of 42 to 1.
Of course, there are cheaper iPods, so the comparison isn't exact; but really, Sandisk is the true number 2 we should all be discussing (except that it's just so much fun to insult Microsoft, isn't it?)
i'm not sure about the actual device, although i've heard it's pretty good, but the name just stucks, it's just like what people say about M$ it's just trying to milk the sucess of the iPod, i HATE products that put an "i" in front of the name because they no it's what apple does, it's like their little signature, it may not be a great signature but it is something that you associate with apple.
So when a company uses the "i" it's like they're just trying to milk the sucess of apple instead of making up their own thing.
i'm not sure about the actual device, although i've heard it's pretty good, but the name just stucks, it's just like what people say about M$ it's just trying to milk the sucess of the iPod, i HATE products that put an "i" in front of the name because they no it's what apple does, it's like their little signature, it may not be a great signature but it is something that you associate with apple.
So when a company uses the "i" it's like they're just trying to milk the sucess of apple instead of making up their own thing.
i'm not sure about the actual device, although i've heard it's pretty good, but the name just stucks, it's just like what people say about M$ it's just trying to milk the sucess of the iPod, i HATE products that put an "i" in front of the name because they no it's what apple does, it's like their little signature, it may not be a great signature but it is something that you associate with apple.
So when a company uses the "i" it's like they're just trying to milk the sucess of apple instead of making up their own thing.
Indeed. I owned BMW i330 in 1992This might come as a shock to you, but iRiver got it's name in 1999, long before iPod... Why do you automatically assume that if something is called iSomething, it's automatically a copy of iPod?
Now we need someone, probably Microsoft again, who will copy iPhone and will bring it to the market in normal, unlocked and unlimited way
The tactics of Microsoft is to copy something, and bring 80% of performance of this product for only 30% of the price. In my opinion it's very important for the market. No matter who invents something, the matter is who can bring it to the market and make it affordable. Apple invented PC but MS and IBM brought it to average consumer. Without tens of millions housewives who could use their win95 and win98 machines web still was an experimental toy.Now we need someone, probably Microsoft again, who will copy iPhone and will bring it to the market in normal, unlocked and unlimited way
I suppose, Microsoft, if was aware of your existence, will think about you bad way, too
I was a pretty hardcore Mac user for years. I owned and operated OSXWORLD.COM. I wrote tons of tutorials for Apple's FCP and DVD Studio Pro. Even published a book on Studio Pro.
But a few years ago after building a PC to run After Effects, I started to use the PC more and more. I like the freedom building my own machine affords. Something Apple won't allow us to do easily.
...
Give the Zune an honest look, unless you're afraid you might like it more than what you have now. Gosh, that would just sour the koolaid now wouldn't it.
-Alex