Come back in 6 months time and re-read my response here:
1) Way too expensive for a "competing" device against the iPad. $449 should've been $229.
2) Nvidia components; it's not gonna be even competitive against the A7X
3) 1080 resolution 16:9 aspect ratio; DOA.
4) Microsoft Surface name - the failure stigma.
5) When the iPad mini 2 w/retina and iPad 5 w/A7X debuts, no one will want to buy a surface 2.
I don't care what you say about the iPad being a toy, a facebook device, whatever you name it - one thing is for sure: the apps that are on the ipad and the hardware itself just blows away everything for the past 4 years.
This surface 2 is just a rehash of the surface 1. If you want to seriously compete, do not name it Microsoft Surface, do not make 16:9, do not market it as an Office device. For f'sake, people want an iPad to NOT DO WORK even though it is fully capable of doing real work.
This is no doubt Steve Ballmer's road map to success. Dump more money into a 2nd generation device when the 1st one is a total failure. Makes logical sense![]()
1) So they should have lost money on it? I can agree the price should be a little lower, but still... no company should really price a product to lose them money.
2) So now specs matter, when it's the iOS device that's ahead. If it's an Android phone that defeats the iPhone, suddenly specs won't matter the experience will. For the record, specs never matter.
3) 16:9 is a good aspect ratio for doing things like watching video and surfing the internet.
4) Most people never heard of a Surface.
5) Different markets with the mini 2, though I doubt it will be retina. As for the iPad 5, different strokes for different folks. They're two separate products being aimed at slightly different markets.
----------
you're almost right though - it's not called niche, it's called amateur work
And why do you say that?