Reason they go 16:9 widescreen on the Surface is because it allows multitasking via snaps.
App snapping is amazing, btw.
Reason they go 16:9 widescreen on the Surface is because it allows multitasking via snaps.
Imagine if Apple had created a separate OS for the iPhone 5C, called it iOS C, and it couldn't run a single iOS app. That is exactly what Microsoft did with Windows RT.
I don't mean this to be some petty anti-Microsoft or pro-Apple comment, but the original Surface failed for various reasons, and they've updated the product with mostly specs and tweaks - do those really address the reasons the product failed a year ago? Just seems like they've just updated a failed product and haven't really addressed the big reasons consumers aren't buying the thing.
That's exactly what Apple did with iOS. It can't run any OSX apps, but it's perfectly fine despite that.
The biggest mistake Microsoft made was calling this entirely different OS that doesn't use windows at all (unless you're using Office) "Windows".
thats what a laptop is for. But explain. Please
Wow, you are resorting to this sort of comment? Dude - so if iPad sells well the metrics don't count. Well then how do you gauge what the majority of population is looking for in a tablet?
How does the Pro 2 compare with the latest Airs? If you add in the type cover (I hate the touch cover, and now it's only 10$ difference) they seem to have similar price...
Was there a Waterworld II?
Or a Howard the Duck II?
They generally don't make sequels to flops.
Seriously, it's kind of funny to go to Best Buy and see a dozen people crowded around the Apple products in a small area, and perhaps 2 people looking at the Surface Kiosk, which takes up 4 times the area.
I have to agree. Even if they called it Windows, they should have used a better name to help differentiate it. They needed to make sure that people knew it wasn't going to run their normal Windows apps.
Or maybe instead of Windows, they could have just called it "Modern OS" to go with the Modern UI.
Apple announced the 5S ten days (as usual) before launch. I got mine today, via UPS. Is there a delay? Of course, and it was expected!
Microsoft announcing a product a month before launch---a product hardly anyone cares about but Ballmer---(did you see Microsoft is buying up used iPads? Yeah, they are...)
Chill out with "you people" -style rhetoric. It only goes to show you're either new here, you're a Microsoft troll, or you're completely missing the point of consumer demand. Microsoft as a hardware company is/has/will failing/failed/fail. Let them! It's just nice to watch from this angle.
If I had to pick any one major fault of MS, it's that they've always been so hung up on Windows as a brand and a base. They seemingly won't do anything unless they're somehow able to tie it to Windows, and they've allowed a lot of good products to slip by the wayside because of their stubborn insistence in doing so.
This is a problem Apple doesn't have. They weren't worried that people might not immediately associate the iDevices with Macs. They just made it the way they thought it should be made, and watched it sell. I think this is the major reason why they tend to be a far more flexible company.
Wait a minute. Sales were dismal for the Surface right? So why make a 2?
If first you don't succeed, try and try again.![]()
...
Innovation? This is a refinement year for Surface, just as it has been for Apple, but anyone who says there's no innovation in Surface is just not looking. And, by the way, the music mix app and keyboard introduced today? Haven't seen anything like that on any platform. That was innovation, and completely unexpected.
...
Isn't Mac Rumors supposed to bring news about MAC?
What Microsoft does or not, does not interest me at all.
Glad someone brought this up.![]()
Performance of an x86 Core line chip > ARM chip
The surface pro (2) is actually a great device
For students - specially for those who need to draw (design engineering etc).
I don't think it's that bad of a device
Yep its like putting 500 horse power in a vw bug. Would you agree MS needs a seamless ecosystem ?
Performance of an x86 Core line chip > ARM chip