bill gates doesn't care about mac people.
bill gates doesn't care about mac people.
Am I the only one here that thinks that the current version of MS Office runs just fine under Rosetta?
SL
Sorry I didn't verify my credentials. At my job, I write Cocoa Applications in Objective C using Interface Builder and Xcode. If CS3 and Office are Cocoa Applications, porting them from PPC to Universal should be a fairly simple task. I'm not saying that it wouldn't take time, but if the applications were written correctly in the first place, it should be an easy task. From what I can tell, Office is a Cocoa application as where Adobe's products seem to still use some of the Carbon API. It's 2007....OS X and Cocoa have been around since 2000......that's plenty of time......then again this is Adobe and Microsoft we are talking about.
It isn't:
It's like a cross between Office 2007 on Windows and Office 2004 on Mac. Personally I quite like the Office 2007 ribbon interface, anyway... it makes editing certain types of document much quicker and cleaner, and it's much easier for Office newbies to get to grips with than the classic Office plethora of menus and hidden options buried deep within arcane control panels.
There have been rumours that Apple agreed to hold back on releasing an update to iWork until Office 2008 appeared. So could the Office 2008 delay be because Apple are about to release an update to iWork next week? Another factor that supports Microsofts delay being political is its decision to bundle MS Works with Vista.
iWork 08 is said to be a major update that will include a spreadsheet. Its word processor - Pages - is also supposed to have vastly improved. If this is true and if Pages can be made load a document from a local drive as fast as Safari loads a page from a site 8000 miles away; and if Pages can save documents in Office Open XML file format - then Microsoft's concern will be justified.
KW
Wrong - Intuit has yet to convert Quicken, or even announce an intent to do so. Plus the feature disparity between Mac Quicken and Windows Quicken is leagues beyond Office.Every other major application on the Mac has been converted to a UB, except Microsoft. It's embarrassing for the world's largest software developer to be last to this game.
dang
Does that mean Microsoft didn't care about Windows?
I started off really liking the ribbon interface. However, when I started doing some heavy spreadsheeting, it got extremely annoying switching between the 2 tabs that i use most often. For most people this should not be an issue, but I dont think the new interface is very suitable for heavy users of Office.
I cant really speak about the mac version, but I dislike the iWork style Inspector. Not a big fan of tabs (same issue as the ribbon!). iWork though digs itself out of this hole by allowing multiple inspectors, which i think works great. Hopefullfy Office '08 will do the same.
On another note, does anyone know if there is any way to read VBA in 08, thru a plugin or something?
You're kidding, right? It's only their single largest source of revenue.Yup. Hammer, meet nail's head.
Let's get Pages and Keynote on the Windows Platform and give MS Office a run for it's money.
You're kidding, right? It's only their single largest source of revenue.
while there is no ipod-like hook to get people hooked on iWork as was the case with iTunes, i still think iWork would be a hit with windows users. just paves the way for switchers!
Not PowerPoint. Try to do an actual presentation to an audience (not just opening a file at home). Lags while switching slides are not OK but still tolerable; the worst part comes when the presentation is over and a question from the audience is addressed such that a particular slide needs to be quickly accessed (happens every time). You go to the slide sorter view to pick the slide and.... and.... and.... and.... the pause is embarrassing, especially that this same operation is an order of magnitude faster on a cheap Dell laptop.
bill gates doesn't care about mac people.
Probably the best hidden feature in PowerPoint (Keynote too I believe).
If you're referring to the comparative percentage of resources that Microsoft as a whole has dedicated to Mac development, that's perfectly reasonable. They're not Adobe - it's not like 25% or whatever of their Office users are Mac, as is the case with Photoshop.We can continue this once the word 'care' has been defined.