I wonder if MS would ever seriously offer an awesome Office Suite for the Mac, Office 2008 is just sad and don't forget 2004.
They could make serious money selling Office Suite for both Macs and Windows. I don't know honestly how much of their revenue is from Office but it is far more than 20% last time I remember. I wonder how much of that is from the Mac suites.
That's precisely why MS won't make it easy for the Web version to be edited or be used to create new docs. They make a lot of money from the Office suites.
It could be locked to the Office desktop, meaning people have to own the Office suite in order to use the web for free.
Since online security has come to the point of being nearly godlike in its perfection, with reports of hacking to be urban legends at best, I will, of course, only use MS Office in online format when the service is released.
![]()
It appears Microsoft may have learned from it's previous "Office Live" false start, where the online apps were trumpeted as "free" like Google Docs.... but you could only use it if you owned the desktop version of Office.
They will remain closely tied to, and largely dependent on, the Windows desktop. This is understandable, since Office for the PC desktop has proven to be Microsft's most valuable cash cow behind its Windows desktop and server products.
So while its competitors are gaining steam with full-blown productivity applications that run completely in the browser -- namely Google Docs and start-up Zoho with its office suite -- Microsoft is still firmly entrenched in the "software plus services" camp.
It appears Microsoft may have learned from it's previous "Office Live" false start, where the online apps were trumpeted as "free" like Google Docs.... but you could only use it if you owned the desktop version of Office.
I'm a bit conflicted about all this. I do use Gmail, so my mail is out there "in the cloud" - but from a security standpoint I'm not super comfortable with having all my personal documents out there, since the security model still seems to be developing (yeah, I know I'm not being consistent). Plus - perhaps more importantly - when I've used the online versions of desktop apps, it's been apparent that the functionality is still somewhat lacking.
You guys are all insane! haha - Microsoft can never catch a break, even when trying to move in the right direction. I'm off of Microsoft since switching to Mac a few years back and I love the OS / software that Apple makes, but let's not pretend that Microsoft can do nothing right. Day late, dollar short still gets to the party! It's so funny to me that people can just go wildly insane against anything good that Microsoft tries to do. If you wanna deal with bad programming, check out RPG!
Yep, what else. Slimy Microsoft wouldn't dream of thinking about the "customer". They just want to make sure that nobody but Windows users can access their crap. Now, if it works perfectly with the browser I choose (Safari) and on the platform I choose (Mac OS X Snow Leopard) then I MAY even pay for their services.
Are you dense? Did you even read the post?
It clearly stated that they are going to provide a Mac version, how in the name of all that is holy can you transform that statement into MS trying to lock in the user to Windows and not thinking about the customer?
I would have expected comments like that if MS HAD OPTED TO MAKE IT WINDOWS ONLY, but the case is not so!
Video at 1:30
"Isn't it great to know that you can access your office files from anywhere directly in a browser and quickly make some changes on any pc or mac."
http://www.microsoft.com/video/en/us/details/8ec069ad-64b2-4eae-80f3-ad4db50b1e37
I'm a big fan of Open Office. It's free, will open MS files, and you can always save to PDF to preserve format. We'll see how it compares...
Yep, what else. Slimy Microsoft wouldn't dream of thinking about the "customer". They just want to make sure that nobody but Windows users can access their crap. Now, if it works perfectly with the browser I choose (Safari) and on the platform I choose (Mac OS X Snow Leopard) then I MAY even pay for their services.
Now here's the key questions...
Is it FREE free?, (No strings attached free)
Google free?, (Usage used for advertising)
Microsoft free?, (To create a proprietary lock-in)
or
Adobe free? (Its a standard but totally sucks)
Of course I should point out that PDF's are not really intended to be editied in the same way that Word files are. They are different document types.
Have you used Microsoft Office 2008 for the Mac?
Perhaps it's been asked before - forgive me - but why isn't there an Outlook equivalent for the Mac?
Microsoft claims that Entourage was intended "to address an entirely different audience". Entourage had its origins in Outlook Express 5 on the Mac, as well as Claris Emailer and contained "no ported code, and no Office code". Nevertheless, Microsoft itself has positioned Entourage as a "similar" product for Macintosh customers on Exchange servers.
Mmhmm, like Apple doesn't make Apple exclusive software. NOT AT ALL, who would have thought Apple would do such a thing!Yep, what else. Slimy Microsoft wouldn't dream of thinking about the "customer". They just want to make sure that nobody but Windows users can access their crap. Now, if it works perfectly with the browser I choose (Safari) and on the platform I choose (Mac OS X Snow Leopard) then I MAY even pay for their services.
Pardon me for asking, but how could you reach that conclusion from the OP where they specifically mention that:
....
Emphasis mine. Thats the exact opposite from what you think is happening.
This takes a stab at Apple's online, fee-based iWork. Regardless on how it works, I will pick the free-version over a fee-based version. Sorry, MS wins with this one. As for people who state it won't run well or it will crash, we really don't know yet.