Originally posted by Wombatronic
Well, no one seems to have mentioned what happens when you right click on the start bar thingy. You get a menu with, among other things, "cascade windows", "tile windows horizontally", "tile windows vertically", "show desktop" ... etc
these have a similar effect as expose, but keep the windows in place (ie, used for arranging windows, not finding misplaced ones). If you like, you can right click again, and select "undo tile". Not sure who all the bozos where offering up bets that "windows apologists" have not used expose (I have, btw) but it seems they haven't used XP.
All this said, I agree with the Kid's point about smooth transitions. Makes it more pleasant, but it is still pretty clear that the *functionality* of expose is in XP (caveat: "omg omg, but is is not functional without the smooth transition and... and... WAAAAAA!!!" folks can bite me.)
I offered up that bet to the windows apologists who clearly had not used the feature as you pointed out.
However, I stand by that bet that many who have criticized it have probably never used it and ironically, I think you agree. Which begs the question, why are you calling me a bozo.
If you bothered to read my other posts perhaps you see that I'm not just "soapboxing" and that I explained, in detail, how it is differnt than anything it Windows. It is changing the way a drag and drop operation is performed. You can tile windows all you want in XP, but not while you're dragging a file. Did you catch that? You can't drag a file and right click to tile your windows at the same time. Is it sinking it yet? XP is not as functional.
In addition, Apple has expose set up super easily with hot corners and hot keys. I even have a mouse button on an expert mouse configured for it. I don't have to right click, and select from a menu. I drag my mouse into a corner (quickly), press a function key, or press a mouse button on my expert mouse to use expose. There is just no comparison to that ease of use in windows. Pulling up a contextual menu (right-click) is simply not the same ease of use, it's nowhere close.
In addition, when you tile a bunch of open windows, you can't see the content of those windows. In expose, you see all of them, and what's going on inside in real time. Again, XP tiling, not nearly as useful.
I could go on but I think you're starting to get the idea. What I think is that expose is a brand new feature and that although you have used it, you don't really understand all it is capabale of. That, or you're trolling, I can't really say. But if you think right clicking multiple times and selecting from contextual menus is easier or the same, you should probably just stick to XP.