Just got done playing with the x86-32bit version in Parallels 7, being that I really do like Windows 7, here are my initial impressions.
The Metro UI reminded me of the old school AOL start/home page of old, lots of banner-like buttons that seemed to appear more like advertising than real features of the UI. This wasn't a good impression as I didn't like AOL so to be reminded of it...
First I can see that the Metro UI is very useful for a tablet, the graphical movement was jittery in my VM due to not having proper graphics acceleration but at least I got to see the purpose behind it. On a mobile device or any computer with a touch interface, Metro may be the way to go about things. The larger tiles are easier to deal with than standard icons and it's very customizable. It didn't take me long to rearrange the tiles to suit my preference. The tiles looked boring and plain at first until I moused over active tiles and saw that it's much more. What made Windows 7's taskbar better than OS X's dock is improved upon within the Metro UI. It wasn't long before I realized that the Metro UI is also a significant improvement over the need to have a Taskbar, instead it's much better.
However for the normal Desktop environment, I feel the "standard" non-Metro interface is better if you plan on using a typical mouse and keyboard. Since I'm accustomed to a standard desktop with icons, taskbar and Start menu, I can open apps and utilities with simple keyboard shortcuts. Speaking only for myself I'm an old dog accustomed to doing things pretty much the same way so I'm reluctant to alter methods that have worked well for me in the past with new processes and procedures.
The ribbon look for Explorer is a hit and miss. For a novice it can be useful if you haven't learned CTRL-C/CTRL-V for example but it's nice that I can hide it. So it doesn't hurt anyone to have ribbon available but it offers the option to not use it, both sides win.
If I owned one of those machines with a touch-based screen, Win8 is definitely something I'd like to try on it. However on my Macbook in a VM, I really don't find much of anything in Windows 8 that's a better choice than XP or Windows 7. I do want to see what makes IE10 better than IE9 though, but more research on that later today.
The Metro UI reminded me of the old school AOL start/home page of old, lots of banner-like buttons that seemed to appear more like advertising than real features of the UI. This wasn't a good impression as I didn't like AOL so to be reminded of it...
First I can see that the Metro UI is very useful for a tablet, the graphical movement was jittery in my VM due to not having proper graphics acceleration but at least I got to see the purpose behind it. On a mobile device or any computer with a touch interface, Metro may be the way to go about things. The larger tiles are easier to deal with than standard icons and it's very customizable. It didn't take me long to rearrange the tiles to suit my preference. The tiles looked boring and plain at first until I moused over active tiles and saw that it's much more. What made Windows 7's taskbar better than OS X's dock is improved upon within the Metro UI. It wasn't long before I realized that the Metro UI is also a significant improvement over the need to have a Taskbar, instead it's much better.
However for the normal Desktop environment, I feel the "standard" non-Metro interface is better if you plan on using a typical mouse and keyboard. Since I'm accustomed to a standard desktop with icons, taskbar and Start menu, I can open apps and utilities with simple keyboard shortcuts. Speaking only for myself I'm an old dog accustomed to doing things pretty much the same way so I'm reluctant to alter methods that have worked well for me in the past with new processes and procedures.
The ribbon look for Explorer is a hit and miss. For a novice it can be useful if you haven't learned CTRL-C/CTRL-V for example but it's nice that I can hide it. So it doesn't hurt anyone to have ribbon available but it offers the option to not use it, both sides win.
If I owned one of those machines with a touch-based screen, Win8 is definitely something I'd like to try on it. However on my Macbook in a VM, I really don't find much of anything in Windows 8 that's a better choice than XP or Windows 7. I do want to see what makes IE10 better than IE9 though, but more research on that later today.
Last edited: