Nitpick? You're not even close to supplying accurate criticism.
Change the name?
Change the aspect ratio?
Add USB ports?
A tablet should be used wirelessly. If you need USB ports, or a widescreen display, go get yourself a laptop.
There are plenty of capitative styli out there for the iPad.
iPad users will look at Windows 8 tablets and laugh at the absurdity.
----------
Metro looks like a kiosk you'd order a sandwich from Subway at.
Change the name?
Change the aspect ratio?
Add USB ports?
A tablet should be used wirelessly. If you need USB ports, or a widescreen display, go get yourself a laptop.
There are plenty of capitative styli out there for the iPad.
iPad users will look at Windows 8 tablets and laugh at the absurdity.
Learn what? Here's what's going to happen: millions of people will continue to enjoy their iPad until Windows 8 is released. And then all those iPad owners will look at their iPad and then look at a Windows 8 tablet and then back to their iPad and say, "Why can't you do that!"
Because the iPad is not a tablet. It's a big iPod touch. If Apple wants to be innovative they have to actually be innovative. They have to address the flaws in the iPad: (a) change the embarrassing name, (b) stereo speakers, (c) change the aspect ratio to widescreen, (d) at least three USB ports, (e) HDMI, (f) Flash, (g) SD card slot, (h) new OS, (i) at least 4 GB RAM, (j) reduce the bezel thickness, (k) removable battery, (l) stylus.
I could add a couple of more things but I don't want to nitpick.
----------
Metro looks like a kiosk you'd order a sandwich from Subway at.
Well, I don't have any data to present but just read the early impressions of Windows 8, and even Metro when it first debuted. The reaction has been ubiquitous, even among posters in MacRumors: it's a smash hit. Everyone just loves Metro. It makes iOS look dated and chaotic. There are many iOS and Mac OS users who are envious of Windows users now.
I think this can be attributed to Metro's UI. The Tiles are flat and plainly colored, they use large typography, and they're disproportionately sized. You also have to pan around to see surrounding content. And live tiles convey information which icons don't. This makes the experience easier.
In contrast, iOS uses textures, gloss, and other eye candy effects to distinguish different parts of the UI. And icons on the Home screen are sized and spaced proportionately. Any information from apps can be seen by accessing the app or Notification Center. This makes the experience harder.
Obviously Metro is a superior UI since so many people call it fresh and original and a welcome change.
Personally, what I love about Metro is that the tiles look just like banner ads. Brilliant.