All of you are using the words "abuse". No. They were using exactly what Microsoft marketed and sold them, UNLIMITED cloud storage. This is completely on Microsoft for offering something they regretted.
Anyways, good business move by Microsoft. Need to stop giving out the freebies and start charging.
" a small number of users backed up numerous PCs and stored entire movie collections and DVR recordings"
so you snoop on our files? no thanks.
" a small number of users backed up numerous PCs and stored entire movie collections and DVR recordings"
so you snoop on our files? no thanks.
Why shouldn't they cut back the freebies if people are abusing it.Why? Are Microsoft not making enough money already? It further adds to their bad name....
They offered unlimited storage, so don't know why they cry now about fair use. Classic bait and switch by Microsoft.If people didn't abuse these services there would be no need for companies to go in and see what the hell was taking so much space.
??? The unlimited storage tier wasn't free. It was promised as part of an Office 365 subscription. I'm not saying that 75TB wasn't excessive, but how does reducing storage on the free tier tie in with that abuse? Makes no sense.So please explain me once again why you are entitled to free 75TB of storage at Microsoft's expense.
All of you are using the words "abuse". No. They were using exactly what Microsoft marketed and sold them, UNLIMITED cloud storage. This is completely on Microsoft for offering something they regretted.
Think about it - How does 1 person or even a family accrue 75TB of data?
This was something nefarious going on with those accounts. And I'm betting the "UNLIMITED" that you agreed to says somewhere in the fine print - "Unlimited for Office 365 Files" or for "Personal Data" not the entirety of your neighborhoods PirateBay downloads archive.
That was my first thought! How did they know what types of files were being stored? It could've been giant text files filled with zeros. If the files are properly encrypted at the server, there should be _no_ way for Microsoft to have known what kind of files were stored.
Really makes you wonder just how honest they are being.
I do trust Dropbox (used for 7 years) now, and I do trust Apple (used for 15 years). But the trust only goes as far as their reputation, which remains golden in my eyes, until it's not.
Well let them be put off. What are they gonna do about it? Be upset because they lost storage they weren't paying for and decide not to use MS's storage anymore? I'm pretty sure that's what MS is hoping for so they can get real users that are willing to pay and not abusers. I wondered how long it was going to take before they gave up all that extra storage offered basically for free.I deem this a classless act from Microsoft, especially for reducing free user's storage from 15GB to 5GB. I did not use that much space and I am glad I did not. But I am sure many people will be put off by this. The inconvenience caused and the broken promise just really inconceivable for me.
So please explain me once again why you are entitled to free 75TB of storage at Microsoft's expense.
Semantics. Most people talk about gettings in to the eco system, how much hardware you reckon they’d sell if it didn't have iOS on the phone? Software is just as important.Apple makes their money on hardware, so offering more storage on iCloud is a no-brainer to drive more sales to iThings. Microsoft hopes to get more in that direction of hardware sales to becomes less reliant on cloud-service revenue.
I hope some of you guys aren’t the same ones that said AT&T throttling you was still an unlimited service.It is not "abuse" since Microsoft promised unlimited storage. Microsoft, care to define "unlimited"?
" a small number of users backed up numerous PCs and stored entire movie collections and DVR recordings"
so you snoop on our files? no thanks.