Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Complicated for whom?

"...the relationship between the Mac development team at Microsoft and Apple is a great relationship. It’s one of our best developer relationships."
- Steve Jobs, D5 Conference 2007

the complication is that Microsoft didn't want the relationship. they were all set too drop all Mac support in Office a few years back. until a little lawsuit put continued support into the final settlement.
 
Yes, let's bring bloat and bad user interface concepts like the ribbon to the ipad. I always loved the defenders of the ribbon: "Keep struggling for a while, and you will eventually like it." Compare this to the swipes and hand motions on the iphone/ipod that even a three year old can understand in a few seconds of use!

It's probably easier just to use iWork in its own format or use its ability to import a .docx formatted file. And if the .docx file doesn't import right, just tell whoever made it to export to .doc and then provide it.
 
If this were to happen, it would be the app that would make it much more likely for me to buy an iPad - yes, even before iWork.
 
the complication is that Microsoft didn't want the relationship. they were all set too drop all Mac support in Office a few years back. until a little lawsuit put continued support into the final settlement.

Correct me if I am wrong, but what you are referring to happened many years ago (1997). If not, what lawsuit are you referring to?
 
If the iPad gets this, it's another reason for me to buy the iPad. While I like Apple's software suite, I prefer MS Word. I use Google Docs a lot now but a dedicated Word and Excel app would make it much more useful for me. I know many others who would buy it as well.
 
Perhaps now the OpenOffice group could get to work on a touch app?

I read a small article interviewing someone involved in the OO project and, basically, it said that doing an iPhone OS version is nearly impossible because the whole code base is in C++ and would have to get ported to Obj-C, which is basically the reason the OSX version of OO sucks.
 
I thought Bill was retired from Microsoft? :confused:

Why the Bill hate. :(

He is retired from day to day activities, but he is still chairman and has a say. He is mostly working on the Gates Foundation now. Which is one reason not to hate him, but seriously, it makes no more sense to hate everything that says Microsoft than for a PC user (such as myself) to hate everything that says Apple on it. I find both companies have made some great products, and a few duds, but many of them are aimed at different market sectors, others compete.
But still, I think Bill does deserve a bit of credit. Complain if you like that Microsoft has lacked innovation (in many respects, it has) but it and Bill have certainly played a huge role of getting computers out there and in changing the world. And so has Apple.
 
I read a small article interviewing someone involved in the OO project and, basically, it said that doing an iPhone OS version is nearly impossible because the whole code base is in C++ and would have to get ported to Obj-C, which is basically the reason the OSX version of OO sucks.
I suppose if they wanted to port over the whole thing it would be difficult, especially for an open-sourced project. If they could just provide readers for OO documents that would be good for a start.
 
What business is going buy an iPad?! The iPad is clearly advertised and aimed at games, videos, ebooks, and web surfing. Sure, there will likely be some "productivity" apps available for it but no business is going to give out iPads to its employees for work use.

I think this is just another distinct example of the vast failure of imagination of tech-minded people, whom I would have expected more from.

No business besides health care? Really? You can't think of ANY business applications?

The number of active U.S. corporations is nearing 5 million, and they account for over $17 trillion in annual revenue. You're sure none of those 5 million in the U.S. alone can think of a use for this?

In 2008, there were 29.6 million businesses in the U.S., according to Office of Advocacy estimates, with approximately 600,000 new ones opening up each year. You are saying that none of these will find a use for the iPad?

And that's just in the U.S. Sheesh.
 
That would be Fantastic!

if the ipad gets Office (yes rather pay 89 for office over 9.99 for the toy that is Pages) and lets me install my own browser (safari does not work with ConstanContact and one other service I need to use for work) - I'll think about it
 
Now that Apple has iWork for iPad, will they allow Microsoft's competing apps?

Their arbitrary and non-competitive approval process, is going to be one of the largest hindrances to the iPad. I certainly won't be buying one until I see some drastic changes in their approval philosophy.

if this boosts sales, yes. Just a very clever way of doing business.
 
Sounds great... just as long as they don't write the code too fat. That's all the startup iPad need is some app to make it chug along.

As for Bill comments - He know he wish he had something to do with the iPad development. Don't set back and make little of something very significant in the way people will do business in the future.
 
I'd like some examples of Apple rejecting competing functionality.

Since as i know the big one was google voice, which they have approved recently I read on the news.
Of course i could be wrong on that one.

Apple will not allow other browsers in the app store unless they use Safari's webkit framework.

They also won't allow another music store or even a podcast app because it competes with Apple's built-in apps.
 
I sure hope so. Say what you will about MS, but iWork is years behind Office.

Not an opinion shared by all.

I prefer iwork, its easier to do the easier stuff - which is what most people want.

word and excel are a confused mess that you need years of experience just to work out where the things you use every day are.

and as for powerpoint - its supposed to make things you WANT to show people? Really?
 
Apple will not allow other browsers in the app store unless they use Safari's webkit framework.

They also won't allow another music store or even a podcast app because it competes with Apple's built-in apps.

The first is a cause of the SDK not the approval process.

as for the second, What about the Rhapsody app?
 
Do you think Pages is a more complete program that Word?

Pages is probably a more complete program than Word for 90% of users' needs.

I rarely find myself missing the bajillion-and-one features of Word when I'm using Pages.
 
Sounds great, but when the breakthrough deal is $99 for Word Touch, i don't see many opting for it over $9 Pages.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.