Apparently no such luck. What you see is what you get.Is there a target display mode on this?
I seriously doubt it will attract very many Cintiq users at all. They would lose so much functionality and flexibility (OS choice, ability to mount to an arm, etc, etc.) Also, this is the first time I've heard complaints about the build quality of Cintiq. Those things are built like tanks (and weigh about as much as one, too).What makes it poorly designed?
Well they will probably attract some cintiq users. Wacom makes crap hardware that breaks, and it's still almost this much for a large one. It would be easier to just drop $3k on this every 2-4 years.
Innovation.
Nooo, not Apple's style (not any longer).
Nobody needs touch and pen input, according to Apple. A touch bar is sooo much better, right?
Have you tried Windows 10? I wouldn't go as far as saying it's better than macOS, but between Apple inexplicably removing useful features from OS X and Microsoft adding a lot of useful features between Windows 7 and 10, I don't miss macOS that much.
God I wish it had columns view in Explorer... I've tried a few unofficial Explorer alternatives that have a columns view, but they're all broken in other ways. I have an experimental file browser I've written (cross platform) which has something that blows columns view away... but I don't have the time/resources to actually polish it enough to use it on a daily basis.
Agreed I remember seeing a patent where the iMac could swivel and the rumors were when the iMac was changed in direction- similar to what the Studio does, it would run iOS.
I guess we were wrong.
Not even slightly tempted. I would get an actual desktop (Mac or PC) if I was paying $3K not a tablet.
It's nice, and I'm glad to see Microsoft pushing Apple in this space, but cannot understand why they'd release a futuristic computer in 2016-2017 without USB-C/Thunderbolt 3 ports. Like it or not, USB-C is the future of ports, and anyone who plunks down $3K+ for this product will be disappointed in 12-24 months time to still be using USB-A and MiniDisplayPort connectors when every other modern computer comes with USB-C/Thunderbolt 3.
Content creation requires lots of palettes, file management and keyboard entry of numerical data, not swooping a brush around and looking at pretty pictures. I only wish a tablet made sense, but it doesn't.
The iMac is really f'ed. Think about it
March 2017, ANNOUNCING THE iMAC!
What's new:
USB C ports!
Thinner!
... cricket.
Known to NOT be an Apple product in the pipeline.
It's nice, and I'm glad to see Microsoft pushing Apple in this space, but cannot understand why they'd release a futuristic computer in 2016-2017 without USB-C/Thunderbolt 3 ports. Like it or not, USB-C is the future of ports, and anyone who plunks down $3K+ for this product will be disappointed in 12-24 months time to still be using USB-A and MiniDisplayPort connectors when every other modern computer comes with USB-C/Thunderbolt 3.
It's still a niche product.
It's a good all in one for creatives, but not more than that.
I'd like to see Apple offering some kind of custom 5K Touchscreen with Apple Pencil for creative professionnals to use with their MacBook Pros
If it could run Mac OS, I would buy one in a heartbeat.
The fact that the iMac didn't make its way here as an option at least is insane.