Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apperently 4k & 3D compatible http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthic...an-do-4k-gaming-more-original-content-coming/

So that is a big plus!

I just hope environments are going to look so real that when I look up from a game at the person sitting next to me, I can't tell the difference. It's freaking about time isn't it?

Kinect interaction is pretty cool in my book!


Silly. 360 and PS3 can't even do 1080p natively. Basically all games run at 720 and are just upscaled to 1080. And 3D? I don't see it.

Let's see them do the level of Crysis 3 at 1080p with 60 FPS.
 
I have a PS3 and the 360 and the online service on the PS3 is not even close to Xbox live, not even in the same league. The voice chat quality is terrible and the matchmaking leaves alot to be desired. Yes it is disappointing that the Xbox One has not matched the PS4 in power specs, but we will have to wait and see how the games actually look and perform before making any real comments on this. More power does not always equal a better experience ;)
When was the last time you bought and used PlayStation Plus? It really is a league ahead of Microsoft's service. At least in Europe it is, where Xbox Live has no added benefit except for being able to go online.

Also, while you can generally not come to the conclusion that games will look or perform better on one device, than another, it is a valid comparison in this case. Why? Because the architecture is almost identical. There are two main differences:

- Xbox One has same type of GPU as PS4, PS4 just has a 'bigger engine' (so to say)
- PS4 has unified DDR5 RAM which makes it really easy to develop for, while Xbox One must throw data over between 8 GB DDR3 and 32 MB of the so-called ESRAM.

It is highly likely that any game developed for the Xbox One will run just as smooth, but probably even smoother on the PS4. Games developed specifically for the PS4 need to be 'watered-down' to run just as smooth on an Xbox One.

Of course, the technical specifications are not final yet until we actually see both devices in-store, but right now Sony has two advantages over Microsoft:

- Architecture the same, but way more power for PS4
- Easier to develop for due to faster RAM + RAM allocation

----------

PS4 hardware is significantly faster than Xbox One. There is no debate on this. It has 50% more GPU cores and 250% more memory bandwidth. CPUs are both very similar and based on AMD's Jaguar core and clock speeds are the same (although unconfirmed and potentially subject to change).

It is the software side that will differentiate PS4 and Xbox One. Personally, my experience has been that the younger generation (i.e. under 30) own game consoles and more so than say my parents. And most of the Xbox One features don't appeal to us (yes I'm under 30 lol). We don't have home theatre systems beyond just an HDTV and maybe some speakers. We stream stuff online more than watching it live on TV. And when we do watch stuff, it's usually on our smartphones, tablets, laptops, etc. Not our TV.

As for gaming, unless it's like 7-8 years ago where the content drought for PS3 was significantly longer than Xbox 360 because developers needed more time to learn the Cell architecture, it will be very similar this time around. All games will be 1080P (no more 720P) and high FPS and etc. But developers will have more system resources available on PS4. And indie developers will most likely find the PS4 platform better to their liking given the information we have thus far. "Real gaming" will be on PS4. If we put this in PC gaming terms, you're pitting a high-end GPU against a low to mid-end GPU with everything else pretty much the same. Both will do 1080P, it's just a question of how well.

Another perspective that eludes Microsoft is that 90% of TV in the world does not operate like the US. There are advantages and disadvantages to this. Most (if not all) of the Xbox One features that we were shown applies directly to the US market. Sure, Microsoft is an American company and of course there will always be an inherent bias towards the US market. But don't forget that globalization is not a new concept today. People have bought Xbox 360s and PS3s all over the world. And people will buy Xbox Ones and PS4s all over the world. Gaming alone is no longer a differentiating factor. The appeal worldwide is.

Lastly, Microsoft has proudly shown us in grandeur that they haven't learned a single thing from Google TV's failures. It's the same exact approach except for a few cosmetic changes (Microsoft logo instead of Google and so forth). IR blaster, HDMI in/out, etc. It's the same exact path that Google TV took and failed in spectacular fashion. Don't do the same exact thing and hope for a different result. That's Albert Einstein's definition of insanity.

Will Xbox One succeed in the US market? More so than the rest of the world. Is it a better game console than PS4? Judging by hardware alone, no it is not.
I see you live in California and I'm actually quite surprised you 'realized' that the Xbox One - for now - doesn't really seem that great for 'the rest of the world'. I totally agree you.

For me, as a European, I was utterly disappointed to see that the event was so much focused on the 'American lifestyle'. Sure, it is an American company and sure it isn't necessarily bad if things are implemented 'the American way', but this thing is supposed to launch worldwide.

It is likely that the TV functionality (at least at launch) won't work for like 90% of the Europeans and lots of their 'online services' are likely to not work here too.

I'm not too worried about the 'ease of use' of the Xbox One: Microsoft is a software company and they know what looks good and how users interact. I was also quite impressed with the new Kinect, but more because of the technology behind it. I actually do believe that in a few years from now, we will actually be 'swiping' to the next channel, to the next app, to the next game when using our televisions.
 
When was the last time you bought and used PlayStation Plus? It really is a league ahead of Microsoft's service. At least in Europe it is, where Xbox Live has no added benefit except for being able to go online.

Also, while you can generally not come to the conclusion that games will look or perform better on one device, than another, it is a valid comparison in this case. Why? Because the architecture is almost identical. There are two main differences:

- Xbox One has same type of GPU as PS4, PS4 just has a 'bigger engine' (so to say)
- PS4 has unified DDR5 RAM which makes it really easy to develop for, while Xbox One must throw data over between 8 GB DDR3 and 32 MB of the so-called ESRAM.

It is highly likely that any game developed for the Xbox One will run just as smooth, but probably even smoother on the PS4. Games developed specifically for the PS4 need to be 'watered-down' to run just as smooth on an Xbox One.

Of course, the technical specifications are not final yet until we actually see both devices in-store, but right now Sony has two advantages over Microsoft:

- Architecture the same, but way more power for PS4
- Easier to develop for due to faster RAM + RAM allocation

I bought psn plus last year and well i have to say i only used my PS 2 months after black ops 2 launch and this year ive played maybe 5-7 days :eek: before that cant remember i even turned the console on; i see no benefit to pay for psn plus because very few people pay for it seems and none of the people i know with a ps3 have ever think of paying for it (they bought it because online is free !).

On xbox live i actually never had problems with the online experience, dont remember any lag and voice chat is perfect aswell party chats and that too me is worth the 50-60 bucks a yea along with the IMO superior controller and exclusives games :) hell microsoft got devil may cry and metal gear solid :eek: something i was shocked to see outside of the playstation.

In the end people will vote with the wallet, and exclusive tittles plays a major role in gamers on a budget (not all can afford every console or just choose not to), myself im going with the xbox one first and after a year il see if it the ps4 is worth it.
 
When was the last time you bought and used PlayStation Plus? It really is a league ahead of Microsoft's service. At least in Europe it is, where Xbox Live has no added benefit except for being able to go online.

Also, while you can generally not come to the conclusion that games will look or perform better on one device, than another, it is a valid comparison in this case. Why? Because the architecture is almost identical. There are two main differences:

- Xbox One has same type of GPU as PS4, PS4 just has a 'bigger engine' (so to say)
- PS4 has unified DDR5 RAM which makes it really easy to develop for, while Xbox One must throw data over between 8 GB DDR3 and 32 MB of the so-called ESRAM.

It is highly likely that any game developed for the Xbox One will run just as smooth, but probably even smoother on the PS4. Games developed specifically for the PS4 need to be 'watered-down' to run just as smooth on an Xbox One.

Of course, the technical specifications are not final yet until we actually see both devices in-store, but right now Sony has two advantages over Microsoft:

- Architecture the same, but way more power for PS4
- Easier to develop for due to faster RAM + RAM allocation


I bought psn plus last year and well i have to say i only used my PS 2 months after black ops 2 launch and this year ive played maybe 5-7 days :eek: before that cant remember i even turned the console on; i see no benefit to pay for psn plus because very few people pay for it seems and none of the people i know with a ps3 have ever think of paying for it (they bought it because online is free !).

That's possible, but you didn't come up with any arguments that change my mind that PS+ is superior to Xbox Live's subscription service.

On xbox live i actually never had problems with the online experience,
Nope, me neither. We must not forget, though, that Xbox Live was hacked too and people actually lost money (unlike the PSN hack, where nobody lost money). Microsoft just concealed it better.

dont remember any lag and voice chat is perfect aswell party chats and that too me is worth the 50-60 bucks a yea along with the IMO superior controller and exclusives games :) hell microsoft got devil may cry and metal gear solid :eek: something i was shocked to see outside of the playstation.

In the end people will vote with the wallet, and exclusive tittles plays a major role in gamers on a budget (not all can afford every console or just choose not to), myself im going with the xbox one first and after a year il see if it the ps4 is worth it.
I agree with you that people vote with their wallets and I also agree on the part about exclusive titles.

In fact, that's why I'll probably go for a PlayStation 4. Just look at PlayStation 3 and 2013: big, exclusive titles are still coming out this year.

Microsoft barely released any great exclusive games in the last two or so years.

In conclusion, I suppose I just prefer Sony's approach. What Sony basically says is: "PlayStation 4 is a gaming console that does some multimedia, too."
What Microsoft basically says, is: "Xbox One is going all-in on multimedia, and oh, it also does some gaming."
 
That's possible, but you didn't come up with any arguments that change my mind that PS+ is superior to Xbox Live's subscription service.


Nope, me neither. We must not forget, though, that Xbox Live was hacked too and people actually lost money (unlike the PSN hack, where nobody lost money). Microsoft just concealed it better.


I agree with you that people vote with their wallets and I also agree on the part about exclusive titles.

In fact, that's why I'll probably go for a PlayStation 4. Just look at PlayStation 3 and 2013: big, exclusive titles are still coming out this year.

Microsoft barely released any great exclusive games in the last two or so years.

In conclusion, I suppose I just prefer Sony's approach. What Sony basically says is: "PlayStation 4 is a gaming console that does some multimedia, too."
What Microsoft basically says, is: "Xbox One is going all-in on multimedia, and oh, it also does some gaming."

PS+ had me at free games... I wish XBL did the same...
 
Silly. 360 and PS3 can't even do 1080p natively. Basically all games run at 720 and are just upscaled to 1080. And 3D? I don't see it.

Let's see them do the level of Crysis 3 at 1080p with 60 FPS.

you're silly. 360 and ps3 do 1080p natively.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.