it was too long!
the ad needs to be short and simple and too the point. theyve made a boring movie that serves no purpose
It made me want a churro.
How I'm trying to see it:
Microsoft wants attention and they got it. Half these posts are just us wanting M$ to fail REALLY hard. Thus huge f'in thread. 😀
I'm just happy that we got to see Mr. Gates shake his booty!
Classy!
Look, bottom line, one is right brained, the other left, that's why the OS's are different.
Yet windows has most of the marketshare, has bailed out Apple a few times and if it wanted to, could buy any companies and build whatever they wanted and probably have a rock solid system. NOTE, see what happens when you mess with 3rd party? Everyone bashes windows but look at the iPhone, Mobile Me fiasco and EXCHANGE not happening, at least not yet.
I think with over 1000 posts, this may do something and I expect the new OS to be mostly done online, slim downed, and fast, with who knows, maybe a mobile device of their own. I look at it like this, if Apple can let WINDOWS run on their machine, why can't a windows machine run OS X?
Apple doesn't make the hardware, cept for maybe the case. The motherboard (ASUS or ABIT), then all apple does is add a EFI chip to stop it from being a normal PC motherboard, everything else is the same PC generic part, from PSU to memory, the only thing Apple makes (and not even USA anymore like in the good ole days) are the cases, power cords, USB cords, keyboards, and power supply for laptops. Everything else is moot.
I see a day coming with either WINDOWS 7 being really all that and a bag of chips or APPLE losing and OS X released to the massess with the assumption APPLE WILL NOT SUPPORT non APPLE HARDWARE, I also forsee huge price cuts coming. Why? One indicator is Apple stopped employee's from getting the refresh machines.
If you work for Apple at the retail level and a new macbook pro comes out (example) $2500 = 2.4, 256 MB GPU, then 2.5, same cache, 500MB GPU same price ($1999 not a good deal, 1MB less cache which is needed for AUDIO/VIDEO USERS), anyway, those products get pulled and labeled EOL, or END OF LIFE, the APPLE EMPLOYEE could buy with 15% dicount (refresh), add another 10% (employee discount) and another 10% for EOL, that makes a $2500 macbook pro for about $1500 dollars, a littler closer to $1600 with taxes. Now, based on salary of a specialist who DOES NOT LIVE WITH MOM AND DAD and has to pay rent ($10.50 part time, $12.50 full time), the only way they can ever buy a mac is with this refresh, but it has been pulled, so my reasoning is, they are going to do price cuts which should equal the employee's one mac per year (25%) = to the same as refresh, so we could see an ACROSS THE BOARD 10% cut on all macs.
$1079 imac
$999 macbook
$1800 Macbook Pro
At the normal rates with 10% discounts still in affect for students, 25% for employee's, otherwise apple is just being stupid, but it would tie in with the conference call that stated they will lose some revenue as they are going to do something knowone can compete with. Although that doesn't sound that ground breaking to = know one can compete with.
Look, bottom line, one is right brained, the other left, that's why the OS's are different.
Yet windows has most of the marketshare, has bailed out Apple a few times and if it wanted to, could buy any companies and build whatever they wanted and probably have a rock solid system. NOTE, see what happens when you mess with 3rd party? Everyone bashes windows but look at the iPhone, Mobile Me fiasco and EXCHANGE not happening, at least not yet.
I think with over 1000 posts, this may do something and I expect the new OS to be mostly done online, slim downed, and fast, with who knows, maybe a mobile device of their own. I look at it like this, if Apple can let WINDOWS run on their machine, why can't a windows machine run OS X?
Apple doesn't make the hardware, cept for maybe the case. The motherboard (ASUS or ABIT), then all apple does is add a EFI chip to stop it from being a normal PC motherboard, everything else is the same PC generic part, from PSU to memory, the only thing Apple makes (and not even USA anymore like in the good ole days) are the cases, power cords, USB cords, keyboards, and power supply for laptops. Everything else is moot.
I see a day coming with either WINDOWS 7 being really all that and a bag of chips or APPLE losing and OS X released to the massess with the assumption APPLE WILL NOT SUPPORT non APPLE HARDWARE, I also forsee huge price cuts coming. Why? One indicator is Apple stopped employee's from getting the refresh machines.
If you work for Apple at the retail level and a new macbook pro comes out (example) $2500 = 2.4, 256 MB GPU, then 2.5, same cache, 500MB GPU same price ($1999 not a good deal, 1MB less cache which is needed for AUDIO/VIDEO USERS), anyway, those products get pulled and labeled EOL, or END OF LIFE, the APPLE EMPLOYEE could buy with 15% dicount (refresh), add another 10% (employee discount) and another 10% for EOL, that makes a $2500 macbook pro for about $1500 dollars, a littler closer to $1600 with taxes. Now, based on salary of a specialist who DOES NOT LIVE WITH MOM AND DAD and has to pay rent ($10.50 part time, $12.50 full time), the only way they can ever buy a mac is with this refresh, but it has been pulled, so my reasoning is, they are going to do price cuts which should equal the employee's one mac per year (25%) = to the same as refresh, so we could see an ACROSS THE BOARD 10% cut on all macs.
$1079 imac
$999 macbook
$1800 Macbook Pro
At the normal rates with 10% discounts still in affect for students, 25% for employee's, otherwise apple is just being stupid, but it would tie in with the conference call that stated they will lose some revenue as they are going to do something knowone can compete with. Although that doesn't sound that ground breaking to = know one can compete with.
Nothing against you or what you said, but you're talking about platforms, product refreshes, OS philosophy, customer base and hypothetical price points of new computers... in a thread about an advertisement for another company?I think with over 1000 posts, this may do something and I expect the new OS to be
[...]
If you work for Apple at the retail level and a new macbook pro comes out (example) $2500 = 2.4, 256 MB GPU, then 2.5, same cache, 500MB GPU same price ($1999 not a good deal, 1MB less cache which is needed for AUDIO/VIDEO USERS), anyway, those products get pulled and labeled EOL, or END OF LIFE, the APPLE EMPLOYEE could buy with 15% dicount (refresh), add another 10% (employee discount) and another 10% for EOL, that makes a $2500 macbook pro for about $1500 dollars, a littler closer to $1600 with taxes. Now, based on salary of a specialist who DOES NOT LIVE WITH MOM AND DAD and has to pay rent ($10.50 part time, $12.50 full time), the only way they can ever buy a mac is with this refresh
[...]
$1079 imac
$999 macbook
$1800 Macbook Pro
[...]
Yes but I didn't see Bill calling Jerry a Jewboy unless I missed that part.
That wasn't advertising. That was stupidity.
Look into the story of New Coke, you might be surprised to learn that it had a very positive effect for Coca-Cola.
Let me be the first to say it.
"WTF?"
......even though New Coke was poorly received.
Old Coke was made even more of a legend.......
you took my line,Apple ad's are cute, Bill and Jerry? STUPID!😕
As New Vista remains poorly received.
As XP has been made even more of a Windows legend. By this token, this great ad ought to do wonders for future sales of XP.
Originally Posted by DMann
As New Vista remains poorly received.
Except it actually isn't except by a few bloggers and journalists with vested interests.
Having been a member of a number of these blogs over the past few years I've noticed the Vista criticism declining as MS got off their backsides and started fixing the problems. As a result all that's left are a few hardcore MS haters (who, let's face it, will never be convinced) and some others who are put off trying Vista for the first time or tried it once after the launch debacle. MS's strategy is to get the latter engaged.
Huh? That was a microsoft ad? I was more focused on the fact it was Jerry Seinfeld and every camera angle was trying to avoid showing that the guy has gone seriously bald over the past few years.
Maybe it's my twisted sense of humour but I thought it was clever and funny. When your companies image is as tarnished and sh*tty as Microsoft it's kind of pointless trying to tell people how good your latest product is. Instead the best you can hope for is to try and improve your image... slightly. A quirky advert that portrays your iconic, traditionally stiff leader as an odd ball shoe shopper has to do more than if they'd got Jerry to stand there and say "Vista is cool".
second that. he said he "leaves that to his wife"
what a flexible guy.