Just enable the two finger right click.![]()
he meant THERE'S NO PRINT SCREEEEN
Just enable the two finger right click.![]()
Personally? Visceral response? Fanboyism?rickag: You seem to be taking the ads a bit personally. I think your almost visceral response is emblematic of why some PC users and the less fanatical Mac users (who I believe actually represent a majority of the Mac population now) find Mac fanboyism to be utterly annoying.
The PC ads were actually a clever response. And yes, using the fat guy with glasses was purposeful on Apple's part.
SON OF A BIT-he meant THERE'S NO PRINT SCREEEEN
Ditto. Some people seem to want to go out of their way to criticise Microsoft. The fact is the ads, seen in their intended context, worked. They were good. They were well made and do a good job at showing that PC users are not all the same (i.e. geeky dull office workers who only crunch numbers.) I was impressed with the atmosphere/image these ads create. They certainly help Microsoft's image.henrymonroe said:I can't believe people will use any excuse (including not using 1% of their brains to get the point) to try and push their zealotry.
Yes, in the sketches John Hodgeman represented a PC while Justin Long represented a Mac, however part of Apple's marketing strategy was to equate the user base of each platform with these characters and what they represented..Yes, using John Hodgeman in a business suit with glasses was pruposeful in representing computer
...
I can only say that you have completely misrepresented the Apple ads and for some reason can't accept the fact that Hodgeman represents a computer, nothing more. Why you and others insist Hodgeman represents the user in unfortunate.
SON OF A BIT-
I'm using an Apple Aluminium Keyboard for compatibility with my Mac and Windows desktop. I need my Scroll Lock and Prnt Scrn buttons back!
henrymonroe
I can only say that you have completely misrepresented the Apple ads and for some reason can't accept the fact that Hodgeman represents a computer, nothing more. Why you and others insist Hodgeman represents the user in unfortunate.
One final comment and I'm through. If the Hodgeman/Long ads represent "elitism and discriminative behavior", why would they produce an ad back in 2006 that, yes, indeed Apple computers are PCs too?
I'm sure someone has said this already, but I don't have the patience to read all these responses.
I find it ironic that Windows not only has to copy Apple's OS (poorly) but also Apple's Ads (again, poorly.)
It's funny how Microsoft is referring to this new ad as "Phase 2" of their marketing campaign.
I wonder what Phase the Zune is in?
Is "Phase Suck" a Phase?
I disagree. I think Apple's ad focus is:
"Complex" tasks are better left to the PC. After all, that is where most of the "Complex" software lives.
"Digital Life" and "Simple" tasks are easier to accomplish on a Mac, with a more shallow learning curve. And, that there is an alternative to a Dell, which likely runs Windows.
Of course, the whole security/virus thing.. well, that's just shameless chest thumping.
Don't forget the target audience here, for both ads. The average computer user... doesn't know **** about computers!
Yes you have misrepresented the Apple ads, plain and simple.Nope, I have not
No it's not.Apple chose to characterize a PC as a person. An uncool person at that. That's a jab at all PC users
I'm an overweight middle aged man with glasses and I take no offense.and discriminative against overweight middle aged people with glasses
Yes they do, this may be the first thing you've said that makes sense.Apple wants you to relate Mac to cool, and PC to uncool
Maybe it did alienate a few who just don't get it, but yes the Apple marketing point is exactly that, PCs are uncool, which only reinforces the public perception of PCs for quite some time.hence alienating PC users and calling them all "users of uncool stuff." That's what their marketing set out to do, and if you can't see it, you're just blind.
But it does, that is the point.Even if you were right, let's assume for a moment that John Hodgeman represents a PC and only a PC, not it's coolness or uncoolness
It doesn't relate to the coolness or uncoolness of PC users.and how that relates to PC users.
Yes, the concept about the variety of uses of PCs is good, I've admitted that. I only have stated that the execution of the concept is poor. It led to the spoof I've mentioned, as have other posters here, and now even iTwire has ridiculed the ad and if I'm not wrong I'd guess iTwire is predominantly a PC centric website.Microsoft's commercials are still genious, because they're saying "look at all these OTHER PC's, and all the things they achieve, the different they are, the variety and versatility they represent.
How many times must I tell you that I agree the concept is good, just the execution is bad and left Microsoft up for ridicule.Apple tries to paint a single picture, a black or white, while MS embraces and celebrates the diversity of PC's, as well as it's users. Again, if you can't see how good this concept is, you[re just blind. Good thing most users here have "gotten it."
Wrong, the Apple ads do in fact point out the diversity of uses of Apple computers. Heck, they even pointed out in 2006, 2 years ago, that indeed Apple computers are PCs. They point out they can run Microsoft Office, handle music, video, etc. etc. etc. Go look for yourself at the ads , they are all still on Apple's website."Apple tries to paint a single picture"????
You consider Long athletic and good looking?As for your final comment, who cares? They're still elitist and discirminative. It's like saying "Look! Athletic good looking people are not only cooler and better at everything, they can use a calculator too!" How is that NOT elitist and discriminative all of a sudden? You sir make no sense.
I'm sure someone has said this already, but I don't have the patience to read all these responses.
I find it ironic that Windows not only has to copy Apple's OS (poorly) but also Apple's Ads (again, poorly.)
Haha, apparently unbeknownst (yes, I do like that word) to you, you just proved Monroe right and all the apologists wrong.I just read HenryMonroes comments. Is he kidding? Why are you taking this so personally? Get a life. Apples are cool. The people who use them are cool because they have sense enough to use them. Why put up with Windows, for home use.
Hmm, that doesn't say anything about contemporary build quality.Want to know that amazing thing about this? That computer was a 400mhz Sawtooth from 1999. I defy anyone to take out a 1999 PC and do what I just did.
Again, thanks for proving that the Apple ads are indeed using caricatures of PC USERS and Mac USERS and not the differences between the os.So, I think that says it all. Apple people ARE cool. Apples ARE cool. That's what THIS reader "understands".
That basically sums up Micro$oft.
Bill Gates is L. Ron Hubbard! Think about it, you buy a PC with XP on it a few years ago then wanna upgrade to Vista, but you want all the features, so you buy Ultimate for $400 but then find out you need a new high spec PC for it to actually run... Just wait until Windows 7 comes out, IE8 already uses 1GB of RAM to run, just think of the hardware costs!
See the pattern? More money every year to keep your M$ crap running! To add insult to injury, Vista STILL wont work properly!!!
All I can say, Any zune will run firmware 3.0......thats impressive when a company looks after its 1st generation adopters. Apple forces you to upgrade at each generation if you want the new features and evem pay for firmware....and Apple sells a hell of a lot more ipods then mikisoft sells vista. Jobs is making way more more money on ipods from average users.
Do you actually use vista??? Its not that bad, OS X is more userfriendly but vista is solid. If there is one ***** OS right now it is the Iphone, that crashes on me 10x more then my vista PC, and it has been "patched" by apple a number of times.
Yes, in the sketches John Hodgeman represented a PC while Justin Long represented a Mac, however part of Apple's marketing strategy was to equate the user base of each platform with these characters and what they represented..
While the overt suggestion was PCs are grey ugly boxes (hence the use of a fat middle aged man), and Macs are shiny pretty gadgets (hence the cool young guy) the tacit implication was that these characters are representative of the general user base.
They may not have been saying PC users are fat middle aged men in suites, however they were equating Macs with film, music and photos, which Apple deemed to be fun and cool, whilst equating PCs with spreadsheets and word processing, which Apple regarded as boring and uncool, thus the conclusion to be drawn was Mac=cool, PC=uncool and the user base of each is cool/uncool through association.
Microsoft's response to this was to highlight just how varied the PC user base actually is, which it did effectively. By showing this, Apple's implication that PCs and their user base are uncool falls apart. The PC user base is far to varied to be categorised. This is why Microsoft's ads worked. If they intended to show why we should buy Windows then they failed miserably, but that was not the goal.
In my view, having shown the diversity of PC users, Microsoft should next target the notion that Macs are creative machines whilst PCs are number crunching machines. Obviously Windows is no where near as easy as the OS X/iLife way for creativity, but this is ultimately irrelevant to dichotomy that Apple presented in their ads. Microsoft can do creativity, and in certain arenas, they do it better due to software availability.
Not forcing their previous users to buy new hardware is why they can't sell any?Yes but thats because the Zune sucks and thats the only way they can sell any.
Did you even attempt to diagnose these problems?Yes, I use Vista Home Basic through Boot Camp on my MacBook and on the iMac its running through Parallels... I have gotten the BSOD three times and nothing works properly... Just yesterday it randomly shut off and came up with the black boot select screen... Among many other problems I have been subjected to in the past.
Not forcing their previous users to buy new hardware is why they can't sell any?![]()
Did you even attempt to diagnose these problems?
I'm still finding Zunes at Best Buy, Target, and even Wal-Mart.No, what I am saying is if they didnt do that they wouldnt sell any at all, thats how bad it is, I remember reading a article about how a major US gadget store stopped selling the Zune and couldnt even get rid of the last stock at a discounted price with free accessories!
I'm sure blaming Bill Gates is the proper solution to your software problems.Vista just sucks. Simple. The problem is Bill Gates is a greedy bastard who dosent care about the quality of his products, only that he makes a stupidly high amount of profit... Same can be said for Ballmer, who is just mad.