"Expert scientists in the appropriate fields can't decide if mobile phones are "dangerous*" or not."
that is correct today. true. but please consider two things here:
1 scientific studies that carry weight are very, very expensive and somebody has to pay for them. now, the vast majority of studies being handed around today are at least indirectly co-sponsored by organisations that are in a conflict of interest, i.e. they profit from the telcomm business in one way or the other. many US universities, especially, have lost their independence many years ago. same tendency over here in urp.
besides, conclusive and bulletproof evidence is hardly ever found in science.
but even more importantly:
2 absence of evidence is no evidence of absence.
considering the potential damage not just to our species but also to everything else on this planet, we would be not overly paranoid to heed that caution.
for the rest; i was expecting some of the feedback to my OP, but the sort of aggressive and nasty comments kinda surprised and saddened me... but then again, not. ignorance has always been compensated with arrogance.
i know the tinfoil hat dude, too, and i was laughing tears when i first saw that pic yrs ago, especially since it reminded me of an old classmate.
and actually, at uni, we got a wlan router that has that pic right next to it, together with the radiation hazard sign
also, read up on the history of asbestos if you care, very similar patterns here...
