Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Everything you post on facebook is public. There's no such thing as a private post, period. You have to treat facebook like that.
Thats not the point tho. The point is your passwords and personal info shouldn't be stored in public.
 
This isn't really a new Facebook scandal. We knew that Facebook overshared data with app developers. Even with that flow now restricted, we're learning one by one about developers who exposed the data they already collected.

Both Facebook and these developers are to blame. Each time a new developer security lapse is discovered, we're reminded of Facebook's original sin and how the repercussions still affect us.
 
Everything you post on facebook is public. There's no such thing as a private post, period. You have to treat facebook like that.

I get the "content" part of this statement. But how is a password part of the content that would be shared? That just seems very wrong to me. It has no above the line value.
 
I use Facebook with a complete understanding that any and everything on there is being sold and likely improperly used. Instagram too. That's why I don't link credit cards and FB has its own individual password. Having said that, I know apps share their data too, so FB probably have it all anyway.

Zuck is the literal devil.

This is very true.

I imagine quite a lot of people have no idea that FB has been integrated throughout the internet. What you post on FB can show up on the regular web. Not your personal page, but places like article comment sections. I've actually come across co-workers' comments in political news articles. And shall we say... yikes. Some things are better off unknown, let's just say.

I keep a separate password for FB and only for FB. All my social media / forum accounts are also tied to a separate email.
 
Another day, another facebook data scandal.
Why are people so stupid as to be on Facebook and advertise their every movement? That is like pleading "Rob me".
[doublepost=1554322258][/doublepost]
I found myself all over the internet right after the election. I had to place fraud alerts on my credit report and I had to go to court because some scammer racked up $40k in credit cards that I never even applied for. Crap like this happens all the time and there’s little a person can do about it.
You can permanently delete your Facebook account.
 
I have no huge love for Facebook, but this article title is blatantly false. Facebook didn't expose millions of records on Amazon's cloud servers, one of their 3rd party partners did, and the article states that in the first line, so why is the title "Facebook Exposes Millions of Records on Amazon Cloud Servers"??

The article also craps on Facebook saying there's "apparently little oversight from Facebook", as if to imply that they'd somehow be able to stop these 3rd parties from mismanaging their data, but how could they possibly know what and where their data is being stored once it leaves their APIs? The company violated Facebook's T&C's, I'm not sure how they'd have the authority or ability to "audit" that.

EDIT: CNN's title for the same article is "Hundreds of millions of Facebook records exposed on Amazon cloud servers". That seems much more appropriate?

Facebook is selling your data.
 
Facebook is selling your data.

False, FB (and all other platform advertisers such as Google, Pinterest, Reddit, etc.) do not sell user data otherwise their competitive advantage is eliminated. User data is used by advertisers on FB's platform to target audiences but they have no access to specific account profiles. In this particular scenario, the user data was collected because of app integrations like using the FB Login API – it was not sold for profit.
 
So happy I STILL DON'T USE FaceBook.....

This!
[doublepost=1554323713][/doublepost]
False, FB (and all other platform advertisers such as Google, Pinterest, Reddit, etc.) do not sell user data otherwise their competitive advantage is eliminated. User data is used by advertisers on FB's platform to target audiences but they have no access to specific account profiles. In this particular scenario, the user data was collected because of app integrations like using the FB Login API – it was not sold for profit.

They may not sell all your data but they sell/share some of it.
They sold/gave friend lists to Bing.
They claim to be only selling analytics, etc. Gather enough analytics and I can identify you. Super cookies, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eltoslightfoot
I have no huge love for Facebook, but this article title is blatantly false. Facebook didn't expose millions of records on Amazon's cloud servers, one of their 3rd party partners did, and the article states that in the first line, so why is the title "Facebook Exposes Millions of Records on Amazon Cloud Servers"??

They may not have been the ones who put the data out there unencrypted. But they're the ones who gave that data out with no oversight. They're as much responsible as the people who leaked it. They were trusted with that information. Now I'm hearing they handed out login information to 3rd parties? No, they're just a guilty here. That's information that should NEVER have been shared with ANYONE. The fact that a third party even had it in the first place to be exposed is entirely on FaceBook. So I can't really give them a pass on this one.
 
This article is factually incorrect and another example of sensationalism.

The leaked passwords WERE NOT FACEBOOK PASSWORDS, they were passwords for the apps that stored them.

But no one really seems to care, they just want another excuse to say "**** zuck" or "so glad I deleted my account".
 
I have no huge love for Facebook, but this article title is blatantly false. Facebook didn't expose millions of records on Amazon's cloud servers, one of their 3rd party partners did, and the article states that in the first line, so why is the title "Facebook Exposes Millions of Records on Amazon Cloud Servers"??

The article also craps on Facebook saying there's "apparently little oversight from Facebook", as if to imply that they'd somehow be able to stop these 3rd parties from mismanaging their data, but how could they possibly know what and where their data is being stored once it leaves their APIs? The company violated Facebook's T&C's, I'm not sure how they'd have the authority or ability to "audit" that.

EDIT: CNN's title for the same article is "Hundreds of millions of Facebook records exposed on Amazon cloud servers". That seems much more appropriate?

More clicks this way. But I think FB bears a lot of the responsibility. They need to have forced encryption and auditing by the subcontractors (or whatever they are) if they're going to give data away this way. That's the way we do it in the medical biz.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MEJHarrison
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.