Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Another day, another facebook data scandal.

And no one cares. Or more accurately, the vast majority do not care. Their resilience clearly demonstrates this fact.

That is why the Google/Amazon hate on here and the Apple privacy marketing, at least for now, is wasted effort. People might as well spend their time shouting at a wall.
 
Maybe Zucker should do some time in the clink!

With the dementors!

My vote is for execution by via explosion of useless, vapid "likes",

PYdmazM.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: v0lume4
I absolutely can't understand why anyone would even use FaceBook with the given facts about all that has and will continue to happen with so much connected with it. Never used it at all even from their beginnings as I always suspected this kind of stuff would happen at some point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drumcat and SRLMJ23
At what point does Facebook's actions start to be criminal and stop being just sloppy business practices? They need to put Zuckerturd in prison for life, and hold Facegarbage accountable in both criminal and civil courts.
 
It's not just facebook. It's banks, Home Depot and countless retailers.
I have a freeze on everything. I can't get credit in my name unless I lift the holds.

Data breaches and leaks are inexcusable. There is not a single reason for any data to live anywhere unencrypted.
The only reasons not to encrypt data is laziness, cheap or stupid.
All my data on my personal devices is encrypted. My laptops, desktop, cellphone are all encrypted.

Until corporations are held accountable for leaks and breaches, they will continue not to care to secure your data.
If all they need to say is "Whoops, my bad" and nothing happens they will continue to do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: decafjava
Hey guys,

I've changed the title of the article here to make it clear that Facebook did not leak this data itself, and I'm sorry for any confusion over the previous title. I've also removed the password bit because it wasn't FB passwords that were leaked.
 
At what point does Facebook's actions start to be criminal and stop being just sloppy business practices? They need to put Zuckerturd in prison for life, and hold Facegarbage accountable in both criminal and civil courts.


As long as it's free and voluntary the government can't do much more than nibble around the edges. I never had FB, except for a temporary dummy account, so I can't get too excited.
 
This running fast and loose with our personal data will never stop unless substantive penalties are put into place by Lawmakers. Otherwise, it's just "whoops, we're sorry, here's a month free of credit monitoring service as a token apology".
 
  • Like
Reactions: bevsb2
For God's sake, can Facebook get their sh*t together?!?! It seems like every week there is a new scandal with Facebook!

:apple:
In this case while the data originally came from Facebook, what happened with it is something that's basically separate.
This isn't really a new Facebook scandal. We knew that Facebook overshared data with app developers. Even with that flow now restricted, we're learning one by one about developers who exposed the data they already collected.

Both Facebook and these developers are to blame. Each time a new developer security lapse is discovered, we're reminded of Facebook's original sin and how the repercussions still affect us.
That's basically a more accurate take on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SRLMJ23
I have no huge love for Facebook, but this article title is blatantly false. Facebook didn't expose millions of records on Amazon's cloud servers, one of their 3rd party partners did, and the article states that in the first line, so why is the title "Facebook Exposes Millions of Records on Amazon Cloud Servers"??

The article also craps on Facebook saying there's "apparently little oversight from Facebook", as if to imply that they'd somehow be able to stop these 3rd parties from mismanaging their data, but how could they possibly know what and where their data is being stored once it leaves their APIs? The company violated Facebook's T&C's, I'm not sure how they'd have the authority or ability to "audit" that.

EDIT: CNN's title for the same article is "Hundreds of millions of Facebook records exposed on Amazon cloud servers". That seems much more appropriate?

Thanks - I don’t even use Facebook, but this is a stupid article and headline.

A more accurate headline would be “Media company found to have publicly stored user data pulled from Facebook APIs”. Makes you wonder if the authors even understand what they’re writing, or if they deliberately report false information to get clicks. The state of reaction-based journalism actually scares me more than whatever FB is doing about privacy.
 
It's probably intentional.

That said this article title seems a bit misleading as if Amazon has something to do with this when in fact they do not.
 
The article says "Mexico City-based media company Cultura Colectiva, for example, was storing 540 million records on Facebook users on Amazon's servers" but does not really tell us why a Mexican company has 540 million records stored ANYWHERE.

I don't know if deleting your account from Facebook will help you not become a victim. I read it somewhere that Facebook retains your information on their servers.

And if a person has NEVER had a Facebook account?
 
And if a person has NEVER had a Facebook account?

They almost certainly have a record for that person anyway. If they've done business with any company that utilizes Facebook's business services, Facebook will likely know about them and have information about them stored.

You can ignore Facebook, but don't be deluded in thinking they've ignored you.

Editing to add a source: https://www.recode.net/2018/4/20/17...les-data-collection-non-users-mark-zuckerberg

https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...-facebook-and-most-users-are-unaware.2170884/
 
Last edited:
"Facebook did not leak this data, but it did provide the data to the third-party companies that went on to improperly store it with no oversight from Facebook."

Not sure if that makes me feel any better. Facebook has got a (bad) history as well.

At least if we start saying "someone" improperly stored it. that covers all bases, no matter who is actually responsible. :) present, or future.

Seems like there are others to be held accountable in this particular case.

You can't hold someone accountable for other people they have no control over. Facebook may not store their data with Amazon services again AFTER this has come out, or at least be cautious.

Its like saying an ISP should take responsible, including what we can't control, like cable cuts at sea.
 
I never even bother to create a facebook account
I don't like social media, I like privacy and security
I only care about my life not anyone else life
trying to live someone else life or being in people business is not my idea of fun or entertainment

people knows what's going on and they continue to use FB
is like they can't live without it

the government can shut down FB and I won't even notice
it will not affect me in any way
others will simply have a panic attack if the government SD their precious FB

but hey is all good they can do what ever they want with their lives

I'm a tough man, I'm not a friendly guy maybe that's why I don't like FB
or probably is because I don't like people
or maybe because I don't have many friends

well I do have some friends but is better to have very few real good friends
than to have a bunch of hypocrites back stabbing, envious pretending to be your friend

the point is I have no use for it, plus FB is untrustable and unworthy
I consider FB to be something like make up that is made for woman
man have no business using FB or make up , well at least real man
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: decafjava
I have no huge love for Facebook, but this article title is blatantly false. Facebook didn't expose millions of records on Amazon's cloud servers, one of their 3rd party partners did, and the article states that in the first line, so why is the title "Facebook Exposes Millions of Records on Amazon Cloud Servers"??

The article also craps on Facebook saying there's "apparently little oversight from Facebook", as if to imply that they'd somehow be able to stop these 3rd parties from mismanaging their data, but how could they possibly know what and where their data is being stored once it leaves their APIs? The company violated Facebook's T&C's, I'm not sure how they'd have the authority or ability to "audit" that.

EDIT: CNN's title for the same article is "Hundreds of millions of Facebook records exposed on Amazon cloud servers". That seems much more appropriate?

While it’s not Facebook that directly exposed the data, it’s a wonder why these scandals keep happening to Facebook at such a large scale compared to other platforms with large user-bases. It suggests there is (or used to be, given that these are mostly older data from years ago) a lot of carelessness about what data is given to third parties and a lack of enforcement/financial penalties for violating their policies, leading to carelessness from developers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MEJHarrison
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.