Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Back To My Mac

Isn't Back To My Mac halfway to this anyway?
I can connect to my home machine as if I was sitting in front of it if all I want to do is manipulate files on that machine. If the iTunes output selector included the laptop I was on remotely, I'd be able to stream my library to my remote machine. Not a huge leap.
I'm not sure it'll happen. Most of these stories are wishful thinking by the writer or some "analyst", but the technology seems almost there.
 
Good for the Enterprise

This sounds like an excellent product for the Enterprise: a service that allows a company to enjoy all the benefits of the cloud while maintaining complete control over their data on their own servers. This would be great for companies who cannot use existing cloud services because of security policies or regulations.
 
My MBP is asleep when not in use.

This wouldn't work for me. Why would I want to run my machine all day just in case I want to access some info from it while away?
 
Isn't Back To My Mac halfway to this anyway?
I can connect to my home machine as if I was sitting in front of it if all I want to do is manipulate files on that machine. If the iTunes output selector included the laptop I was on remotely, I'd be able to stream my library to my remote machine. Not a huge leap.
I'm not sure it'll happen. Most of these stories are wishful thinking by the writer or some "analyst", but the technology seems almost there.

Wrong - the technology is not almost there, it is already there. This is not a problem of technology, it is more a problem of how many people can get the technology into their house (for an affordable price) and how many can access the technology on the go. It is amazing how many people cant get decent download speeds, and it is even worse for the upload speeds needed for this. It is that this is for too many not an option right now, even though the technology is readily available. Also, there are (pricy) options on some airlines to get in-flight network, but not all airlines offer it and if they offer it they charge too much - again technology is there, but can't be used by everyone.

But I like the feature, it has a lot of potential - as long as they don't remove the memory from my iDevices (for the times where I don't have access). They also need to offer a cheap device to enable this service at home, since this idea won't work for laptop users - if you travel you can't access your library, so whats the point?
 
LOL exactly. Bad idea. And that's not even getting into the security implications of opening up your computer backend to the WWW.

guess you dont use Air Video or LogMeIn, telnet, or any other sort of remote desktop agent? security can be managed well enough for the typical risk vs reward.

as for the streaming -- most streaming servers are capable of determining your device & bandwidth, and giving you something appropriate. i use Air Video to watch my HD content on iOS devices and dont have a problem with it.
 
Last edited:
Apple has shown in the past not to care about these people...

exhibit 1: ATV 2

huh? ATV is a media streamer. if you dont have the bandwidth to stream...then you really cant play, can you?

as for leaving it on 24/7, the ATV consumes very little power in its sleep mode.
 
please don't let is have to run via iTunes and need your PC or Mac up and running for this to work.

If I'm going to have my PC running, I may as well use my PC to do the job in the 1st place.

well, unless you arent, you know...there.
 
Last edited:
Buy Dropbox. There's your solution.

Exactly. If this is the route they are going (again - remember these are just rumors people) then DropBox is already there. The only difference I can see is that Apple can make it more "Apple-Integrated." That is to say to make it more seamless than the way DropBox is on the iPhone now for example. For instance, your "cloud" music files would appear just like your other music files, except maybe their titles are italic (as opposed to appearing in your DropBox application on the iPhone as it is now). And if you delete them from the cloud, they are also automatically deleted from your iPod list. Same thing with photos and project files, etc.
 
Ever since iTools went to a pay model Apple have floundered and in most cases just let the service drift around overpriced and aimless.

This is yet another revamp. They don't have any direction when it comes to the MobileMeHobby and I expect in another 18 months when they remember the service still exists they'll rebrand it to something else.

MobileMe should be largely free again in some form - especially email. Paying for an email address? Idiotic.

The majority of people on this forum probably don't even remember the grand announcement and promise of iTools by Jobs. That didn't last. As long as Apple users are content with giving Apple money for something they clearly do not care about optimizing then I guess it will stay overpriced and under-performing for ever.

I remember that announcement back in 2000 and so. The account for users that would be free for ever. If I recall that lasted what 3 years at most with the change to .Mac.

That was one of Steve's greatest cons. There are many to choose from. As someone else mentioned earlier, the servers may be there but the rest of the infrastructure just couldn't cope. Even in South Korea it would struggle. The ability to be able to cope with such a large and constant flow of data is years away.

Also what would happen if the Data farm when up in smoke? Have Apple built a second farm for their own back up?
 
This rumor doesn't ring true either. So you are out for the day, or traveling and you need to leave your "Individual machine" on back at home (or wherever) out of sleep mode. There's a environmental step backward.

wake on LAN, dude.
 
now they are just making crap up.

Considering Apple doesn't even let you store movies on the new AppleTV.
And MacBook Air (possibly future Macbooks also) just moved to low capacity Flash based storage.

Apple's direction is definitely storing media on their server.
 
Pretty useless while carrying your laptop around if it's your only machine.

sounds fine to me. But might be a problem for people with slow network connections and people that don't want (or can't) leave their machine on for 24/7.

Amen! I love my Apple TV but the one thing I HATE is having to leave me MacBook Pro on with iTunes running and connected to my Time Capsule 24/7! It is ridiculous and overly complicated! :mad:

I think this makes sense though.

Apple will upgrade and promote time-capsule, or something like that.

Not a complete computer you need to run 24/7, but just a small harddisk with amazing capabilities, focussing on cloud stuff.

Sounds like a niche the time capsule could evolve into...

If these rumors are true then they would absolutely need a solution something like that! But do I really wanna spend another $500.00 on a new Time Capsule??? :rolleyes:

I have tons of music in my iTunes library that I didn't purchase from iTunes (but sill own legal) .... that needs to be stored somewhere (and I don't think they will give us free access to music we purchased at other places)

Oh yes, streaming my 720p video episodes from home at 384kb upload will be.... interesting :mad:

If this only supports content purchased from iTunes which I wouldn't be surprised, then I will be pissed! Until they get 1080p and day and date release on all films with DVD for purchase, sorry! And how about iTunes Extras support on the new Apple TV and iDevices?!

now they are just making crap up.

Considering Apple doesn't even let you store movies on the new AppleTV.
And MacBook Air (possibly future Macbooks also) just moved to low capacity Flash based storage.

Apple's direction is definitely storing media on their server.

Valid point! But as long as the movie situation on iTunes is as I described above then we have a problem! Hollywood pisses me off so bad and I am a film-maker haha!!! The MacBook Pro update this year will probably axe the super drive and go solid state which puts us in a tough position taking into account the state of movies on iTunes again. I think if Apple goes that way with the MacBook Pros this year it will be very controversial. Might be a year too early for that!
 
Last edited:
This is what I thought would happen. But I don't think they would give everyone 100GB... maybe 20GB if they chose to be true cloud storage? And then you could always pay for more? Who knows.
 
Seriously ?

Like the networks are not already super overcrowded. Lets see how ATT can handle an all network depending iphone. Apple is so turning into a NOT COOL regular crappy phones company.
 
The music which you buy from itunes is already on their server so who needs 100 Gb:confused:
this also with videos,podcasts tv shows movies even your app store apps whats actuallly only stored on your pone my phones is synced with flickr for my photoes we dont even need 1 gig of local storage
 
If this cloud-based service is true, wouldn't Apple need to bundle MobileMe with the new "iphone nano?" It just doesn't make any sense at all.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

Maybe a low priced media server that connects to your network like a NAS drive for those who use notebooks as primary computer?

People will leave imacs on 24/7 so they can stream music? what a waste of energy.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

They should make the next time capsule have a copy of your iTunes libary that runs at all times so your devices can access it
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-gb) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8C148)

If were having a "personal cloud" Just get subsonic....and iSub for iphone and bypass itunes and there walled garden!!!
 
I have this up and running and it's not working for reasons:

1. My upload speed isn't good enough so streaming my lossless music doesn't work (and this is 90% of my collection). This could probably be solved by:
2. There is no convenient way of creating a 2nd lower bit rate streaming version of the music. Shouldn't be hard to fix but it's not there today.
3. While this is relatively easy to setup and stable I still think it's more work then the average person wants to deal with today. To make it work it needs to be much more streamlined.

I still think a more attractive solution is to be able to have your music in the cloud but as people have pointed out the size of my music (alone) is >250G (lossless) so even down-converted it will take quite a bit of space.
 
That's what MobileMe already does.

MobileMe syncs very small files such as Contacts and calendar events. This is taking it to a whole new level with documents, and media as well.

As long as it was secure, I would love to have access to my home files while on the road. Current solutions are quite piecemeal - dropping of a few files here, transferring over Wi-Fi or USB...I would love to have on-the-go access to my Documents folder, iTunes library, etc.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.