Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
More Claims of September 9 Debut for Apple's Wearable Device, Likely Positioned as iPhone Accessory
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Essentially this is Tim Cooks first real test. If he is able to run Apple as well as Jobs was then it's likely our expectations are just right if not too low...
I have a strong feeling that the "iwatch" will be very different than what people expect. Apple is all about simplicity and intuitive design. Who knows what this could have. Along with health sensors it could also have sensors that detect muscle activity in your hand to control other Apple products. Which would be an AWESOME way to control your apple TV or Mac.... Don't just think iPhone accessory....I bet this will be an accessory for most, if not all, Apple products.
I agree with you somewhat in that I think if this steers away from conventional watch territory, and something that can be worn like a fitbit in addition to a watch, except with a lot more sensor capability, then it will be great! I just hope "iPhone accessory" is not the best way to describe this device.
If you send a text from your watch, it will be through Siri, not some tiny keyboard. I believe the watch will have a mic but no speaker. You will talk to Siri through the watch, and Siri will respond with text and images on the watch, as it does on the iPhone screen now. This gives the watch tremendous power, because Siri can do a huge number of things.
It might also be a health sensor, a security device (authenticate while wearing the watch and as long as you keep wearing it, you'll not need passwords on the phone), and perhaps participate in POS (with NPC in the watch you could wave it at a point of sale terminal instead of fishing out and waving your phone).
And it will be very handy for notifications as expected. At the board meeting, you simply glance at your watch instead of fishing out and looking at the phone. For phone calls, it will tell you who is calling. You can decline the call or reply with a text.
Duh!
Of course it's an iPhone Accessory! Talk about stating the obvious. If they don't announce it at the iPhone event they'll have to wait until the next one because it's just not a big enough product to justify it's own event.
Of course it's an iPhone Accessory! Talk about stating the obvious. If they don't announce it at the iPhone event they'll have to wait until the next one because it's just not a big enough product to justify it's own event.
Huh? FitBits track steps whether you are running, walking, or climbing stairs. At my company, those steps of mine (measuring in the thousands per day) get me points via a third-party program (Vitality) that we use. Those points get me money. In 6 months the $80 FitBit paid for itself. Because of this, it's anything but a niche market in our locality.
As far as the interface, it really has NONE to speak of, but in 5 lighted dots, it tells me what I need to know. Via BlueTooth it syncs with the iPhone app and tells me a whole lot more. Battery life is over a week. I'm not sure which of these statistics you consider "plaguing."
In any case, it would take a nice-looking device to make want to not wear my Seiko OR my FitBit - but with Apple, it's possible.
Agree. I am hoping this is more than a fancy remote screen. When I sit down for lunch or meetings, I take my iPhone out of my pocket and sit it on the table where I can see it anyway.
I'm expecting wireless charging from a meter away. You put a charger unit on your nightstand and it charges on your wrist while you sleep.
BTW I have a Tissot watch I bought for $350 35 years ago, I seldom take it off, it still tells perfect time to the second, takes a battery every two years, and its sapphire crystal hasn't got the tiniest scratch. So clearly I expect the iWatch to have a sapphire crystal, and probably a liquidmetal case rather than the usual stainless steel (since liquidmetal can be molded).
Also, it will be smaller than expected, since some of the device will reside in the watchband, like some or all of the battery, and maybe antennas and sensors, letting the main case stay small. The band would still be replaceable, but by special Apple bands in various colors/styles.
who says you would be able to. Everyone is thinking that this is going to be basically an iPhone on your wrist but what if it's not. What if it's really nothing more than a Fuelband with some Pebble like notifications and perhaps the ability to pick up an incoming call if you are using a bluetooth headset so you can keep your phone safely in your pocket.
but no apps, no outgoing anything.
----------
depending on the price i would be in also
I've got a working 1st gen iPhone setting in the drawer. I could get $1K for it?
----------
Fame?
or are they saying 'wish we could say more' because there will be nothing left to say after they unveil everything at one event
iWatch from SET
I do hope that the possible iWatch doesn't look like the SET Solutions picture.
I do hope that the possible iWatch doesn't look like the SET Solutions picture.
Anxious to see what they will be showing. I know it's not the case for everyone, but for me, "iPhone accessory" = me not interested. This could be a turning point or just another device looking for a market. Knowing Apple, I'm optimistic that it'll be the turning point. But at the same time, I'm not holding my breath.
I'm already tethered to a device (iPhone). I don't need another device tethered to that device.
----------
You nailed it! But damn! I just ordered a quad this afternoon!
I'm glad Amazon has easy returns.
I'm already tethered to a device (iPhone). I don't need another device tethered to that device.
----------
You nailed it! But damn! I just ordered a quad this afternoon!
I'm glad Amazon has easy returns.Funny you ask. This one does.
And why would anyone buy that when a smartphone does a better job at smartphone tasks and has a longer battery life to boot?
One key feature added in iOS 8 is the lift to create/listen to voice clips. My guess is sending and receiving voice clips via phone and watch/band will be what this is referencing. You will not be texting on your watch, it's all about voice. Tim Cook even mentioned this was a key feature during an interview a while back.
For people saying it is pointless if it is a mere accessory, and how hard is it to take the iPhone out of your pocket etc, I think there is a point to it. Just one example is navigation. I find it very irritating when I am navigating a city on foot, stopping to get out / look at my iPhone all the time. I can imagine a system where you work out a route on the iPhone and then, with your iPhone in your pocket (safely in your pocket where crime may be high), you can just glance at your watch periodically. It would show a simple directional arrow, and the distance remaining. I think that sort of thing would be good.
Perhaps the term "accessory" is a bit harsh. My guess is that it will be positioned more as a "companion" to the iPhone. The idea being to increase sales of iPhones alongside sales of the new wearable device.
No one bought a FuelBand or Fitbit thinking it was going to replace their iPhone at anything. We have dreamed a world up around here lately where the wearable will do everything and we can throw away our phones, but we are years away from anything close to that.
No one bought a FuelBand or Fitbit thinking it was going to replace their iPhone at anything. We have dreamed a world up around here lately where the wearable will do everything and we can throw away our phones, but we are years away from anything close to that.
First-gen Apple products aren't always that bad. I had loads of fun with my 1st-gen iPad back in 2010. Yes it was missing cameras and it was somewhat heavy, and yes the much better iPad 2 came less than a year later, but I never regretted getting the iPad 1. It was a great device that served me well.
Almost all 1st-gen devices from any company aren't fully-featured and have a short lifespan, but most devices nowadays aren't lasting long anyways. And being a proud owner of 1st-gen something is pretty cool
P.S. looking forward to the new wearable Apple has in plan
"DOA" is a bit extreme. The Pebble, Fitbit flex, Nike Fuel Band, all are iPhone accessories and yet they all reached a certain success. With Apple's own imprimatur it will be a sure fire hit out of the gate, especially if it's below $199. Total grand slam if its under $150.
As for looks Apple doesn't disappoint when it comes to design. Companies copy Apple's product looks they are that good. Museum display now obsolete product as art the design is so classic. So futuristic or traditional will not be important; only that its something people want to put on their wrist and be seen wearing.
Lower your expectations guys!
I think of the rumoured iWatch more like an iWearable which would play a role like the Apple TV is playing in the Apple ecosystem: add value. If you own an iPhone, an Apple TV and even an iPad, coupled with iCloud services and the iWearable, expect to be empowered by Apple products and services.
I think of the rumoured iWatch more like an iWearable which would play a role like the Apple TV is playing in the Apple ecosystem: add value. If you own an iPhone, an Apple TV and even an iPad, coupled with iCloud services and the iWearable, expect to be empowered by Apple products and services.
I don't think "accessory" is either harsh or demeaning. It also appears to be a word an Apple source used to describe the band. I take the description to mean the band is a dumb terminal of sorts for the iPhone.
----------
The catch is you can keep your iPhone in your pocket to see who called, who left a message, text, etc. Then there is all the HealthKit stuff. It won't be a hobby because Apple doesn't need to beg content makers for a license and it already has plenty of 3rd party devs ready to create compatible apps.