I don't get it
I don't get it. Presumably making the iPhone smaller, but retaining all of the functions of the bigger one, makes it cheaper? How does shrinking the screen but keeping the screen resolution of the regular iPhone make the iPhone nano any cheaper to make? Okay, it could have just 4GB of RAM, but they can just do that with a regular iPhone as well. The differentiation between products would be solely based on size? If anything, the iPhone nano would be more expensive, because they have to cram more features in a tinier package. They could of course dump the WiFi, but that's just a few cents shaving off manufacturing costs. Also note that the iPod nano has about a tenth of the storage space of the iPod Classic. iPhone nano and iPhone 3G differentiation wouldn't be on size, clearly, but it would be based on 3G versus EDGE. An iPhone for everyone. But how would one type on such a small screen?
iPhone nano: EDGE
iPhone 3G: 3G
I don't get it. Presumably making the iPhone smaller, but retaining all of the functions of the bigger one, makes it cheaper? How does shrinking the screen but keeping the screen resolution of the regular iPhone make the iPhone nano any cheaper to make? Okay, it could have just 4GB of RAM, but they can just do that with a regular iPhone as well. The differentiation between products would be solely based on size? If anything, the iPhone nano would be more expensive, because they have to cram more features in a tinier package. They could of course dump the WiFi, but that's just a few cents shaving off manufacturing costs. Also note that the iPod nano has about a tenth of the storage space of the iPod Classic. iPhone nano and iPhone 3G differentiation wouldn't be on size, clearly, but it would be based on 3G versus EDGE. An iPhone for everyone. But how would one type on such a small screen?
iPhone nano: EDGE
iPhone 3G: 3G