Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I heard some companies are using "AI" to review resumes, so at some point in the future, the interview process is going to be bots talking to bots lol
I’m certainly using ChatGPT to slick up my resume.
But the other day we were interviewing somebody on camera, he repeated everything that was said out loud, then his eyes flicked down and over and he droned an answer. Whatever could that have been about LOL
 


iPhone users have largely avoided the Apple Intelligence features released prior to iOS 18.2, a new survey suggests.

Apple-Intelligence-General-Feature-2.jpg

A survey conducted by SellCell, a tech trade-in platform, has revealed that while nearly half of iPhone users—47.6%—consider AI an important factor when purchasing a smartphone, 73% of those who have used Apple's AI offerings feel that the features add little to no value to their experience. This sentiment is not unique to Apple; the study also found that 87% of Samsung users expressed similar dissatisfaction with the AI tools available on Galaxy devices.

Apple introduced many of its AI features in October 2024 with the release of iOS 18.1. Among the most used tools were Writing Tools, which help with text editing and summarization, and Notification Summaries, which condense key information from multiple notifications into a single view. These were used by 72% and 54% of respondents, respectively. Other features, such as Priority Messages, Clean Up in Photos, and Smart Reply, saw lower adoption, ranging from 44.5% to 20.9%. Features such as natural language search in Photos and transcription summaries were even less popular, with fewer than 15% of users trying them.

One major finding of the study was that despite the general lack of use of the current features, Apple users were more likely than their Samsung counterparts to view AI as a significant deciding factor when purchasing a phone. While nearly half of iPhone users expressed that AI is a very or somewhat important consideration, only 23.7% of Samsung users felt the same. Nonetheless, many Apple users have not updated their devices to iOS 18.1 to access these features, with 57.6% citing this as their primary reason for not using Apple Intelligence. Others mentioned they found the features unhelpful or were concerned about accuracy and privacy.

Despite AI advancements, brand loyalty among Apple users has weakened in recent years, with the survey indicating that 16.8% of iPhone owners would consider switching to Samsung if Galaxy AI features proved significantly better. This represents a marked decline in loyalty, with only 78.9% of respondents now identifying as firmly committed to the Apple ecosystem, down from 92% in 2021. Conversely, just 9.7% of Samsung users expressed a willingness to switch to Apple for better AI features, suggesting that Apple faces stiffer competition in retaining its user base.

The survey also revealed that a majority of smartphone users are unwilling to pay for AI services. Only 11.6% of Apple users said they would consider subscribing to such features, compared to a mere 4% of Samsung users. It is yet to be seen if the arrival of iOS 18.2, which introduces features like Genmoji and ChatGPT integration, could shift perceptions.

The survey was carried out in late 2024 and included over 2,000 participants aged 18 and older in the United States. The pool consisted of iPhone and Samsung Galaxy users whose devices supported AI features.

Article Link: Most iPhone Users Uninterested in Apple Intelligence, Survey Suggests
Certainly not the game changer a lot of the so called "experts" predicted
 
Certainly not the game changer a lot of the so called "experts" predicted
A ton of Mac podcasts have been careful and playing the wait and see game, I've seen maybe a couple of Dalrymple takes breathlessly saying it's the bees knees. Curious.who else is propping this up
 
When I can have a simple conversation with Siri that’s when AI will be useful.

Currently you ask Siri a question and she has limited responses. With AI Siri could at least provide contextual information and respond the output verbally.

In addition, Siri would be better for search (ask and respond) verbally, instead of manually typing into a search engine (keyphrase and result).

Apple could add-on some ads to the end of the verbal response where Siri suggests local businesses or an organisation that could help with the verbal query. Leading to a phone call or an email. A verbal suggestion would be like an impression, a request to call or email would be equivalent to a click.

Apple, why aren’t you thinking like this anymore?
 
Last edited:
When I can have a simple conversation with Siri that’s when AI will be useful.

Currently you ask Siri a question and she has limited responses. With AI Siri could at least provide contextual information and respond.

In addition, Siri would be better for search (ask and respond) verbally, instead of manually typing into a search engine (keyphrase and result).

Apple could add-on some ads to the end of the verbal response where Siri suggests local businesses or an organisation that could help with the verbal query. Leading to a phone call or an email. A verbal suggestion would be like an impression, a request to call or email would be equivalent to a click.

Apple, why aren’t you thinking like this anymore?
❤️ This is the way
 
I heard some companies are using "AI" to review resumes, so at some point in the future, the interview process is going to be bots talking to bots lol
Most ATS systems already use keyword matching .. I assume this is what they are saying "AI" so they can please their investors.
 
On iPhone 16 pro max with 18.2 and all features turned on I just asked Siri when is the first day of winter.

The response - ‘June solstice was on Thursday June 20th 2024’

Wtf?

Just tried the same… uh… well done, Intelligence, you are very Intelligent indeed. (You can’t see the question because the genius type-to-Siri erases the question before answering it.)

Screenshot 2024-12-16 at 20.56.24.png
 
Yeah I could see this... I used image playground for like 10 minutes. was very disappointed by it and have not touched it again. I like the idea of image cleanup, but every time I use it, it's horrible... anything removed leaves a distorted looking background in the image. It just doesn't work for me.... Even when picking the objects pre-suggested by the system.

have not used writing tools a single time, but that could just be due to my workflow, I don't really write anything long from my phone... Others could certainly find this useful.
 
All I wanted was Genmoji but my iPhone is too old and apparently it doesn't exist on macOS.

As someone who was looking forward to Genmoji, you are not missing anything. It is pretty crap. I ended up just turning off all Apple Intelligence. In fact, I would even say Memoji was a cooler idea / feature.
 
Hoping that lots of analytics are being shared with Apple so they can see how many people are not using new features. Looking at you, mail categories.

Yea I turned that junk off immediately. I remember when Gmail tried that years ago and I also turned it off right away.
 
The only AI tools I found to be really helpful is Photoshops ability to extend photos, and ChatGPT helping to write better. The text to image features are fun for a goof.
 
I've been using Ai on my MacBook Air and iPad Air. Meh.

While I've tired of the firehouse of "tweets" on X, Grok is pretty cool. It's become my shortcut for quick questions. And Midjourney rules the Ai image space.
As part of a Music library cleanup, I used Grok to make an Apple Script and bash script. The produced scripts did exactly what I wanted (other than a quickly resolved posix file issue). It’s hard to be impressed with what Apple has done so far when a 3rd party AI can produce more useful results. Apple seems to be focused on the useless image playground and genmoji stuff. Meanwhile on X you can use grok to very effectively explain posts, memes, and images to you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlanMarron
The human brain and judgement is ultimately better than any AI slop served to us.
Generally this is true but where AI really shines is doing multiple complex tasks synchronously that a human brain could never do. For example, self-driving. That technology is hugely impressive because a human is incapable of taking in visual information from all sides 360 degrees around and then making split second decisions based on that simultaneous visual data.
 
I think everyone will have a different risk/reward scale for what they are willing to put up with in terms of limiting factors and performance vs benefits to privacy. I'm starting to wonder if it can be done well, or competitively well enough, within that framework or if Apple will have to reconsider their privacy stance (which is mostly performative and marketspeak anyway)
True. Apples privacy policies are the best in the business.
. It may come down to Apple architecting things that more resemble a Google or Facebook approach with an asterisk of "trust me bro."
“Trust me bro” is not going to happen.
They are certainly struggling and so far behind right now that I wonder how long it would take for them to be good enough in this field,
I don’t see them as far behind at all. Function for function, integration for integration what does the competition do better that leaves “apple in the dust”. I got it, opinions.
and whether they can pivot institutionally to this new way of thinking about and making software.
What new way of thinking?
The old way is engrained in the company and I expect the old guard to put up quite the fight on the way out the door
There won’t be any”way out the door”, not sure where that came from.
 
Agree so far, but ditto for my Android. Probably nice features, but just don't use all that glitz on my phones. Use it lots on my Windows CoPilot PC and in MS Office.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.