Well, given that the remote uses Bluetooth, you could always hide the thing behind the TV or something.The unit is ugly -- certainly worse that ATV3 -- and it's expensive.
Well, given that the remote uses Bluetooth, you could always hide the thing behind the TV or something.The unit is ugly -- certainly worse that ATV3 -- and it's expensive.
The unit is ugly -- certainly worse that ATV3 -- and it's expensive. What are you really getting over and above the ATV3? Crossy Road?!
I can think of one very good use for the A8: multi streaming. The MLB app they demonstrated had two streams side by side (presumably at the original 1080p60 as they could instantly zoom in) plus stats and live scores on screen at once. If apps really are going to change TV's it's stuff like that which will do it and you're going to need a fair chunk of horsepower to give a good experience.The new processor is for gaming, switching apps might be a millisecond quicker but that's about it. Loading content is all dependent on your network connection. I honestly see no other use for the new CPU besides gaming , and unless you're super casual you'll be gaming on current gen consoles or on PC.
I can think of one very good use for the A8: multi streaming. The MLB app they demonstrated had two streams side by side (presumably at the original 1080p60 as they could instantly zoom in) plus stats and live scores on screen at once. If apps really are going to change TV's it's stuff like that which will do it and you're going to need a fair chunk of horsepower to give a good experience.
Good point. The MLB app is by far the most technically impressive use of the new Apple TV yet.
guys
guessing air play won't be an issue on a samsung TV?
I understand the temptation to pre-order, but I don't really understand why anyone would. We still don't really know what we're getting. Apple are selling the device by focusing on apps, but what apps are going to be available on Day 1? BBC iPlayer? Amazon Prime? Which video services will be searchable via Siri? Netflix?
The unit is ugly -- certainly worse that ATV3 -- and it's expensive. What are you really getting over and above the ATV3? Crossy Road?!
We already know Amazon and BBC won't be available.
Amazon, maybe never, who knows. But the BBC is likely to arrive at some point and if it doesn't, well I've been using the unofficial iPlayer app and it's a pretty good stand in even at this early stage.
Good thing you can watch Amazon Instant Video on Apple TV via AirPlay.
Good thing you can watch Amazon Instant Video on Apple TV via AirPlay.
You can do that on the existing Apple TV at a fraction of the cost. Of course, you won't get screensavers that are actually videos, and you won't be able to play Crossy Road. So, you know, that's worth another $100, clearly.
You seem to like mentioning it running Crossy Road in your posts, either your on commission for advertising it, or severely ill informed about just what is coming to Apple TV.
Haha. Well, it's because they made such a big deal of it in the Keynote. People were fainting with excitement when they demonstrated that the all new Apple TV could play a game some of us were playing the 1980s when it was called Frogger.
That I'll agree with. I thought at the time it was an odd choice to showcase its gaming abilities. Considering some of the, significantly more impressive, games that are coming. I suppose it's that old, whatever casual game happens to be flavour of the month nonsense. Amazon did the same thing with the two player flappy bird crap for the launch of the first Fire TV.
Neither here nor there, but was it the 80's? I was sure it was the late 70's. Damn I'm getting too old to remember my youth![]()
Well, quite. My point is that Apple seems to me to have done a really poor job in selling this product. They say it's all about apps. OK. What apps? Er, Crossy Road. OK, well I've already got that on my Kindle Fire TV. What about BBC iPlayer? No. OK, what about Amazon Prime Video? No. Er, OK. Can we have a list of exciting apps to sell the device to us? No.
Meanwhile, people are panicking that they might not get theirs unless they preorder at 8:01 GMT.
In the 1970s all we had was that rubbish tennis game that we all thought was mind-blowing at the time. The one with two straight lines and a dot.
That I'll agree with. I thought at the time it was an odd choice to showcase its gaming abilities. Considering some of the, significantly more impressive, games that are coming. I suppose it's that old, whatever casual game happens to be flavour of the month nonsense. Amazon did the same thing with the two player flappy bird crap for the launch of the first Fire TV.
Neither here nor there, but was it the 80's? I was sure it was the late 70's. Damn I'm getting too old to remember my youth![]()
Me personally, I would loved to have seen them with a port of Wii Sports. We still whip that out for a family game from time to time.
Why don't you go back and check out the keynote. They showed more than just Crossy Road there.Well, quite. My point is that Apple seems to me to have done a really poor job in selling this product. They say it's all about apps. OK. What apps? Er, Crossy Road. OK, well I've already got that on my Kindle Fire TV. What about BBC iPlayer? No. OK, what about Amazon Prime Video? No. Er, OK. Can we have a list of exciting apps to sell the device to us? No.
Meanwhile, people are panicking that they might not get theirs unless they preorder at 8:01 GMT.
In the 1970s all we had was that rubbish tennis game that we all thought was mind-blowing at the time. The one with two straight lines and a dot.
guys
guessing air play won't be an issue on a samsung TV?