Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Dear NAB,

(Again) You're not fooling anyone. This isn't about safety, it's about salvaging the ratings (therefore ad revenue) of your member stations. Here's a novel solution: Deregulation led to the growth of mega companies that seem to own most of the stations in the country (I'm looking at YOU iHeart) and that's led to the homogenization of playlists, formats, and what music is heard, which has led to lower listenership.

It's my opinion that you should once again regulate how many stations and markets one group can own/be in, leading to more local ownership which leads to a better variety of programming. This and limiting how many hours a day a station can be voice-tracked or automated will lead to higher listenership, ratings and eventually ad revenue.

Your Welcome.
 
Maybe Apple will make a dongle for it and call it a day? Imagine a retractable antenna, but with a male lightning port.
 
What about the phones not even having the necessary hardware and antennas do these people not understand?

According to the article, they claim the Apple does have the hardware inside with a few minor modifications. It also sounded like they were asking that Apple make the modification for future iPhone releases.

I'm of the opinion that Apple doesn't want to add FM because it would compete with Apple music.
 
Talk about a big government approach... What business does the government have forcing a company to do something like this? Apple has deemed it an unnecessary feature for their devices and the American population agrees. How can you tell they agree? Because they keep buying them! If the public truly wanted an FM radio in their device then they should make it known with their wallet and another company should step up and provide such a device. Let the free market regulate business, not Big Brother.

In that case, it's clear Americans want FM radio.

Samsung took #1 slot last year in the U.S. market. There are certainly more U.S. market Android phones with FM radios than iPhones.

Long live FM broadcasting!
 
FM radio has become beyond useless. All the stations are owned by the same people who do nothing but slap the same 20 song playlists on all the stations. AM is even worse full of racist talk shows. This technology just needs to die and I am glad apple is not prolonging its existence by having an app for it.

You'll probably be the first to complain that the government could have saved people's lives if it had "encouraged" terrestrial radio capabilities in cell phones as a last lifeline. It doesn't have to be all of FM radio. It could just be one "emergency" frequency in every metro area -- similar to how NOAA radio works.
 
There is persuasion and then there is begging. Apple, just like any company or person, will do what they want.

Seems like nobody gets that these days.
 
I do not need or want an FM radio on my phone. I have a perfectly good wind up emergency radio which is far superior in an emergency than anything you can hobble onto a cell phone. I seriously don't care what this marketing group for FM radio stations think. FM is dead, has been for years.
 
They don't have the necessary antenna for FM.
My LG G6 (no carrier branding) requires headphones be plugged in.
The wires for the headphones are the antenna.
 
I could be completely off here but I wonder if they don't do this because ultimately it could mess with network reception and cause issues with other frequencies the device uses.....just a thought.
FM radio is in the 88-108 range. Most wireless carriers are much higher (Verizon bought 700 years ago and T-Mobile just bought a bunch of 600) you have better chance of interference from another carrier than FM radio. Plus, it’s not broadcasting, it’s receiving, and there are FM broadcasters all over the world, so if FM interfered with your signal, it would be doing it already.
 
Dear Greedy Corp,
I noticed that in your recent products (iPhone 7 and 8) there is no function of hover board. I demand you to add it to all your future products. I don't give a **** to all your technical, marketing, political and other considerations. I just strongly believe that if i want it you must do it.
 
Does this chip have an FM worldtuner, or does it come in different versions? Maybe that's why Apple is not using it.
 
Did you even read the article? They understand it quite well and are taking issue with Apple actively choosing not to include FM chips. They even cite the iPod nano's FM chip and 15 minute pause/buffer feature.

Why people are angry about this, I'll never know. It would be a welcome addition.

Edit: perhaps my post is misleading. Sure the Broadcom chip may/may not have FM capabilities...only Apple can tell us for sure. Can it be enabled via an OTA software update? Nobody knows for sure. It's weird that Apple said the hardware was missing from the 7/8, only to magically admit it's there but possibly turned off. Tim being sneaky for no reason at all.

My TV and toaster also don't have FM chips. So what? And the Nano isn't even a current product (must like most radio stations). Either way, Apple doesn't owe the radio conglomerates a line of distribution any more than Walmart owes shelf space to Hustler or Best Buy.
 
So a phone that has a very finite (roughly 20 hours) battery life needs an emergency fm function? The Sony ICFP26 (AM/FM radio) is 20 bucks and has approximately 100 hours of battery life on 2 AA batteries. Which makes more sense to use in an emergency? We expect too much from one device as it is.

Link to the Sony radio on Amazon's US site.
http://a.co/6dSJxeH
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
So a phone that has a very finite (roughly 20 hours) battery life needs an emergency fm function? The Sony ICFP26 (AM/FM radio) is 20 bucks and has approximately 100 hours of battery life on 2 AA batteries. Which makes more sense to use in an emergency? We expect too much from one device as it is.
It is Apple's fault if they did not implement an ultra low power mode like Samsung.
 
  • Like
Reactions: paul4339
Did you even read the article? They understand it quite well and are taking issue with Apple actively choosing not to include FM chips. They even cite the iPod nano's FM chip and 15 minute pause/buffer feature.

Why people are angry about this, I'll never know. It would be a welcome addition.

Edit: perhaps my post is misleading. Sure the Broadcom chip may/may not have FM capabilities...only Apple can tell us for sure. Can it be enabled via an OTA software update? Nobody knows for sure. It's weird that Apple said the hardware was missing from the 7/8, only to magically admit it's there but possibly turned off. Tim being sneaky for no reason at all.
Have you been following any of this? Just cause the feature is in the chip does not mean it is connected. So no OTA update will get it working. On top of all that. No phone FM service will ever beat this device in terms of reception and battery life.

s-l1000.jpg
 
Dear Ajit Pai,

The way you get companies to do things for the public good is to REGULATE THEM using YOUR GOVERNMENT-GRANTED POWER to do so. You are the head of the damn FCC, so if you want them to do it, make them! Groveling like a baby does not make companies do things voluntarily.

Signed,
The Taxpayers who want you to do your job and stop being an industry stooge.

Eejit Pai does not care about the public good. He's made this abundantly clear through his statements and actions (e.g. his desire to kill net neutrality; thinks 1 ISP counts as "competition")

If I was Cook, I'd tell Eejit that Apple will put in FM radio in future iPhones only if the FCC leaves net neutrality alone.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.