Im just saying that distractions are all over, if we want to be truly safe from ourselves we would ban everything that can hurt us.
Just WOW.....
most motorcycle drivers DO NOT weave in and out of traffic. MOST of them are very safe drivers. Very few do the stupid things you list.
As for drivers I see to many of them pick on them. Ride the motorcycles rear tire and harrase them. One time I had to intervene by getting in front of the harasser to protect the rider. I am in a car so A if they did hit me I am a lot safer in my car than they are. B it gave the rider time to get away because I slammed on my brake hard.
As for see them I will admit motorcycles are hard to see because they are smaller in size but as a driver of larger vehicles we should watch out for them and give them some extra room.
I am on his side. He values his life more than a phone conversation. You frankie talk tough but if you hit some one on a motorcycle and either killed them or seriously hurt them you would have a lot of trouble forgiving yourself.
Im just saying that distractions are all over, if we want to be truly safe from ourselves we would ban everything that can hurt us.
She cited a study from the Harvard Center of Risk Analysis that found cell phone use while driving accounts for about 6 percent of crashes each year nationwide. That's 636,000 crashes, 330,000 injuries, 12,000 serious injuries and 2,600 deaths, she said.
Let me guess. You'd classify yourself in the adept driver category?
Why stop at cell phones, ban everything in the car.So stupid.
Not a chance at the national level... it's a simple states rights issue.
Not sure what the vitriol is about cell phones in cars. Cell phones in the wrong hands are annoying everywhere, not just in cars. It's a lack of manners, not an inherent danger in using phones.
It should be a state's rights issue, but this group is pushing for a nationwide ban, so that when I go to Teh Middle of Nowhere, Texas, I can't even use my bluetooth legally.
...but cell phone usage doesn't have the same stark distinction in my eyes.
Cell phone driving statistics
Distraction from cell phone use while driving (hand held or hands free) extends a driver's reaction as much as having a blood alcohol concentration at the legal limit of .08%. (University of Utah)
The No.1 source of driver inattention is use of a wireless device. (Virginia Tech /NHTSA)
Drivers that use cell phones are four times as likely to get into crashes serious enough to injure themselves. (NHTSA, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety)
10% of drivers aged 16 to 24 years old are on their phone at any one time.
Driving while distracted is a factor in 25% of police reported crashes.
Driving while using a cell phone reduces the amount of brain activity associated with driving by 37%. (Carnegie Mellon)
http://www.nationwide.com/newsroom/dwd-facts-figures.jsp
People always over-rate their driving abilities and put their stupid trivial comforts over the safety of others.
If you're reduced to hypothetical arguments you've nothing more to add.
I wonder how many people would rate their driving skills as being above average? Certainly more than half.
Exactly. Will you sign my petition to de-criminalize DUI? Thanks.Why stop at cell phones, ban everything in the car.So stupid.
There is a big difference between DUI and cell phones.Exactly. Will you sign my petition to de-criminalize DUI? Thanks.
![]()
There is a big difference between DUI and cell phones.
Studies can be made to say anything. I think if anything can cause an accident in a vehicle no matter what it is we should ban it.all the studies ive linked to as well as BV say otherwise
8.1.4 Entertainment Systems
• Tuning a radio while driving appears to have a detrimental effect on driving
performance, particularly for inexperienced drivers.
• Research also suggests that simply listening to radio broadcasts while driving
can impair driving performance (Jäncke et al., 1994).
• Research suggests that operating a CD player while driving is more distracting
than dialling a mobile phone and eating, however the use of voice-activation
may minimise this distraction.
8.1.5 Non-Technology Based Distraction
• A recent study by the American Automobile Association’s Foundation for
Traffic Safety revealed that a greater proportion of drivers involved in traffic
accidents are distracted by eating or drinking (1.7%) than by talking on a mobile
phone (1.5%) (Stutts et al., 2001). Results of an experimental study by Jenness
et al. (2002) also corroborate the results of Stutts et al. They found that eating a
cheeseburger was as distracting as using a voice-activated dialling system, but
less distracting than continuously operating a CD player.
• Several studies have found that smoking while driving increases the risk of
being involved in a crash (Brison, 1990; Christie, 1990; Violanti & Marshall,
1996).
• A summary of current research on teenage passengers revealed that the presence
of passengers increases crash risk, particularly for younger drivers, and this is
believed to result largely from distraction and peer-pressure (Williams, 2001).
Studies can be made to say anything. I think if anything can cause an accident in a vehicle no matter what it is we should ban it.
I go back to Andy's post. https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/6919288/
I'm assuming you can substantiate this claim? And please, spare me anecdotal evidence.There is a big difference between DUI and cell phones.
DUI impairs your driving from the moment you get behind the wheel. Unless you are on the phone the entire drive it isn't the same.I'm assuming you can substantiate this claim? And please, spare me anecdotal evidence.
Here's a study that found talking on a cell phone (hands free or otherwise) to be equally as dangerous as DUI: http://www.unews.utah.edu/p/?r=062206-1
Would it be alright for me to drink while driving? What if I'm sober when I start the car?DUI impairs your driving from the moment you get behind the wheel. Unless you are on the phone the entire drive it isn't the same.