yeah, just like when they dropped floppy drive support![]()
And started installing *zip drives* in macs.
yeah, just like when they dropped floppy drive support![]()
As TWC and NBC point out, Flash dominates the web. iDevices are basically the only devices that dont do flash. Why retool your entire library for less than 1% of the web browsers world wide? That's just plain dumb.
Again this is not an endorsement of Flash or saying that Flash is better than HTML5. Just stating a fact.
I understand that - but my point still stands - calling HTML 5 not a "standard" is not 100% accurate. The W3C considers it a standard in draft form.
I personally don't give a darn what NBC or Time-Warner wants to do - let the consumers decide that. My statement does not have anything to do with a companies business decisions.
Everything I need to know about Flash I get when it crashes my browser and/or kills my battery. What else is there to know?
"Hi, I am a developer and I don't want to try something new, even if it will be better than what I am currently doing and will allow my content to instantly be available to millions of users that currently cannot see my content in the bloated, buggy format that I refuse to move from."
Do you, Time Warner and NBC even know what you are talking about when you say stuff like this? Flash is not a codec or a video encoder. It is simply a wrapper used to display video on the web. The "cost" to convert it to something else would be minimal. The whole thing is absurd.
Exactly. There is no reason for Apple not to allow Flash support for those that want to use it in the interim, other than Jobs throwing a hissy fit in his increasingly Orwellian world.
I never said it was a final standard - in fact I used the word "draft" which is what the W3C refers to it as. And calling something a standard does not necessarily require it to be finalized - standardization is a overall process.It is not a standard until the spec is final. Until that point it is a proposed standard. This is why all of the wireless N routers sold prior to the spec being made final were labeled as Draft N.
Unfortunately that is true.That means nothing though to most companies. They want it standard, burnt in, in mass, and then they will move. Thats just big companies.
I think that people should not use closed systems like Flash or ActiveX, but otherwise I do agree with you.IMHO, I think everyone should just make both version and carry on but it wont happen. A lot of people here seem to be great CIO's when they click the reply button but wouldn't last a second in the real world.
Let's face it.... There are MANY times more Windows users than OS X. And there are more Android sales now than iPhone(I believe I read that). Flash works great on Windows, and is now working on Android. So..... do the math. Until Apple outnumbers their competitors userbase, they'll just have to dream on SJ changing the standard. He's trying to take on a lot.
Obviously the poor management at NBC is showing through. It appears that living in the past and ignoring the future is the common mode of operation at NBC.
As to Time Warner who even cares anymore about them?
If color TV was the new technology of the day both of these companies would avoid supporting the new standard. After all Black & White dominate the broadcast industry. Simply put they are the authors of their own destruction.
Dave
Unfortunately that is true.
I think that people should not use closed systems like Flash or ActiveX, but otherwise I do agree with you.
And started installing *zip drives* in macs.![]()
Everything I need to know about Flash I get when it crashes my browser and/or kills my battery. What else is there to know?
"Hi, I am a developer and I don't want to try something new, even if it will be better than what I am currently doing and will allow my content to instantly be available to millions of users that currently cannot see my content in the bloated, buggy format that I refuse to move from."
FAIL. More Android sales? Sorry you cannot back that up.
Flash does NOT work on Android. Didn't you see the demo?
Yes - instead of Jobs going on the attack - Apple could have actually worked with Adobe to help make Flash more efficient on iPads. But nope.. Jobs goes on a negative attack and reduces the amount of internet content the user can experience on their Apple mobile devices.
HTML5 media will get here.. 1+ years ( after IE9 is released ).
which then led to...
(found a zip disk the other day in class and none of the students had a clue what it was![]()
FAIL. More Android sales? Sorry you cannot back that up.
Flash does NOT work on Android. Didn't you see the demo?
Do you, Time Warner and NBC even know what you are talking about when you say stuff like this? Flash is not a codec or a video encoder. It is simply a wrapper used to display video on the web. The "cost" to convert it to something else would be minimal. The whole thing is absurd.
NBC.com has been able to stream videos to the iPhone/iPod for a long time now, so their videos are already encoded so they would work on iDevices. This whole announcement is absurd and ignorant and clearly not made by people at either company who actually understand the technical issues involved in any way shape or form.
Six months max before they sing a different tune. Short sighted fools.