Guy 1: My phone is faster than your phone!
Guy 2: I have a girlfriend.
And if you have both?, which I do...
Guy 1: My phone is faster than your phone!
Guy 2: I have a girlfriend.
They might be doing it for a different reasons then?
I see lots of talking about the benchmarks in the article. But I do not see any attempt to see whether it is not the benchmarks which are targeted, but particular types of the workloads. I know for a fact that GPU drivers (from both nVidia and AMD/ATI) can adapt some settings in run-time based on how the game has initialized and uses the 3D subsystem. But then, with PC games/benchmarks/drivers the cheating was confirmed by simply renaming the executable. In the article, nothing similar was done, and neither tests were done with real actual workloads to see whether they trigger the same behavior.
All in all, if there is no change in performance, why they then consider it to be a cheating at all?
And if you have both?, which I do...
Glad to see the Nexus 4 being well behaved.
And here's hoping that the Nexus 5 is based off the G2 (with no cheating!)
First, Adadis is english?
And second, you have show Chinese knockofss, they don't have nothing to do with Korea
Seriously - who cares about benchmarks? It's never ever come into a phone purchasing decision for me. The only people I see talking about it are iPhone fanboys on here.
Further proof that Apple is not concerned whatsoever in winning the spec war amongst device makers. Which makes the comments by the Qualcomm executive about the A7 being nothing but a gimmick all the more funny.
How is that proof of what Apple wants. All that's given as proof is that some manufacturers have "rigged" the test. That has nothing to do with what Apple does or does not care about.
If they didn't care about specs - they wouldn't place them prominently on their website nor talk about them during keynotes. Of course Apple cares about specs.
I didn't say they didn't care about specs. I said they're not concerned about winning the spec war, as in filling a spec sheet just because, like those that find it necessary to cheat.
Ok - what proof can you provide that they aren't concerned with winning the spec war?
I didn't knew that Koreans write with Chinese symbols.
Koreans do write Chinese characters. But in the photo, it is Chinese knockoffs.
How is that proof of what Apple wants. All that's given as proof is that some manufacturers have "rigged" the test. That has nothing to do with what Apple does or does not care about.
If they didn't care about specs - they wouldn't place them prominently on their website nor talk about them during keynotes. Of course Apple cares about specs.
uhh...like cheating on benchmark scores, which appears to be almost an industry standard.
Or cramming as much RAM as possible, or putting in a 41 megapixel camera, or an SD card slot, etc. etc. etc. They could if they wanted to, if all they cared about was "winning the spec war".
I love how having a girlfriend is a tech forum user's trump card
All you've posted are what you believe the other companies are doing to win a spec war. You haven't proved that this news is "Further proof that Apple is not concerned whatsoever in winning the spec war"
Nor have you really proved that Apple is not concerned whatsoever in winning the spec war in general.
All they do in Korea is copy everything. I love Koreans but they don't innovate in any business. When you go there all you see is fake Nikes, Adidas, cheap suits, faux leather, faux wood, faux gold, faux everything. It should be expected that they cheat in benchmark tests.
And if you have both?, which I do...