I disagree about 'bling' in the past. The definition of bling has a connotation of 'characterized by vulgar or pretentious display.' While Apple users were often accused of such motivation, I don't think it was for most folks. We saw great design for reasonable prices considering the quality and productivity. I suppose there was a bit of appreciation of the good design, but I'd not call that bling. I suppose it's debatable, but I'd not consider a Porsche bling. I suppose it could be taken that way, depending on the context, but at some point it becomes obvious. IMO, Apple has crossed that line over the last few years.
Bling was probably the wrong word. I just meant their stuff looked great and had substance behind the look, now it's just about looks.