Ad plan with low resolution stream on a 4K tv? lmao Amazon Prime offers 4K with ads freevee or basic Amazon Prime.
Pay to watch ads or pirate to not see ads.
Ridiculous that the legal way gets you less value.
I didn't read your comment in it's entirety. I would have done had you answered the question first and then explained your reasoning for agreement, disagreement or neutrality.Apple was able to thread this needle with the music store. There’s a solution if a company is willing. This, however, is not the case. It can be done by respecting customers and providing convenience. Folks did the right thing ages ago but Netflix is just another network at this point with all the baggage that entails. And they continue to be rewarded for their laziness and lack of initiative. So people only have themselves to blame in the aggregate sense. And those inclined to download unauthorized copies will jump back on that train. It will take some time for the pendulum to swing back but I think this is a self-correcting issue. When we start seeing articles about it that when you know it’s about to happen.
What if I was never planning on buying it anyway?
True. Lots don’t seem to have anything inside them saying “don’t fall for it” or “refuse to be ripped off”. Paying to watch ads is like buying a new car to push it.It’s never gonna happen
Exactly. That’s what I’ve been doing. Going to my local CEX store and eBay and buying cheap blurays and then ripping them to my NAS and I have them forever. No subscription. No quality loss. Pure 4k bluray on my OLED tv is better than ANY subscription and it doesn’t cost me any more than it would paying for Netflix etc.or just purchase on 4K Blu-Ray much better quality and no ads. Hard copy is going nowhere.
Speak for yourself lol. I would never pay to watch ads. Ever.Have us watch ads and yet pay for it. Genius. And what a sad bunch of people we are to swallow that. Maddening 🤬
Have us watch ads and yet pay for it. Genius. And what a sad bunch of people we are to swallow that. Maddening 🤬
Pay to own a TV or break into your neighbors house and WATCH thiers. I fixed your incorrect analogy.Pay to own a television or break into your neighbor’s house and steal theirs.
Ridiculous that the legal way gets you less value.
You are so right. Meanwhile we pay the price hikes, pay for better experiences like HD and Atmos, pay for better streaming, all to put more money in the pockets of the company releasing the content, those part of the production, the actors, producer, etc. Corporate greed. There is no excuse, yet there is.I love it when people quibble over the definition of "theft" and "piracy" - regardless of what you call it, you're depriving not only the company releasing the content of income, but those who were part of its production. There is no excuse for it, but people keep finding new ones every time the structure of media changes.
I have the free Netflix sub from T Mobile and I literally see an 20 second ad in a tv show every 2-3 hours. I forgot I had a plan with ads.Like others have mentioned, ads at the start of episodes are tolerable for me. But I find I’m unable to tolerate ads during episodes, especially when they are not at stopping points created by the producers.
Has this improved at all? The early implementations of ad-supported tiers that I experienced were awful, incredibly lazy, with scenes cut off, endings mangled, and so on. You couldn’t go back and replay something without the whole thing crashing.
as opposed to just watching from your college roommate account?View attachment 2398426
Some users here.
YouTube has a free/paid model and they generated more revenue than Netflix. I wonder if Netflix would generate more revenue if they let people watch for free with ads
The thing about YouTube content is that they are not funded by the parent company, but instead paid out of pocket by the creators themselves. It's not as though Youtube helped to defray the cost of say, filming a MrBeast video. So ads for YouTube really represent pure profit (since they keep ½ of ad revenue). Though they probably spend more on hosting and moderation, it's probably still a drop in the bucket compared to your standard 6-8 episode season.YouTube has a free/paid model and they generated more revenue than Netflix. I wonder if Netflix would generate more revenue if they let people watch for free with ads
There is no “value” in pirating. It makes you a common thief, no different than the guy who breaks into your car and steals your radio. I fail to see where theft can be justified under any circumstances.
YouTube shows a CRAP ton of ads though, and lets creators embed banner ads in content. Most YouTube videos consumed are under 10 minutes creating a lot more opportunity for serving even more ads.
Look at Tubi, Crackle, FreeVee, etc. 100% ad supported and not bringing in huge swaths of money. When watching a movie or a TV show, you can only get away with so many ad breaks before people will just not watch. A 15 second add between binging 2-10 minute videos is perceived differently.
There have been interesting points raised, and I haven’t really thought about how privacy vs theft; does distinguishing privacy from theft matter, are they both “bad” or is it by nature a degree of “badness”?
The start of my not thought-through idea: although you’re not “taking” the item from the owner, the taker is still up one item, and the owner is out one sale. Although not everyone would buy in the alternative, some would. So would the rights to the item not have lost value? A highly pirated album must surely be worth fewer USD than had the same album not been pirated, right?
I am inclined to believe, at the moment, there’s a distinction between piracy and theft. From a morality scale of 1-10 (assign either end as better or worse, doesn’t matter). Whereas morality of piracy may sit between 4 and 7, theft might occupy morality between 1 and 10. We can all imagine a person who steals out of necessity, and we can all imagine a teenager downloading a movie they’ll never be able to afford. There’s not a situation that I can conceive of where there is a piracy of necessity, nor where piracy is the equivalent of stealing the life savings of a person without earning potential.