No different then the other streamers on a rotating basis here. Doesn’t really matter what they do.
charging for 4k?It's because they are one of the only streaming holdouts that want to charge for 4K...in 2022.
Their fading business model resulted in a 9% increase in revenue year-over-year.HAHAHA
I wish them nothing but the worst. Blaming users for their fading business model is coming off as very condescending
What about 320x200? What does that cost in 2022?It's because they are one of the only streaming holdouts that want to charge for 4K...in 2022.
But if you think about it $20 divided by four households, is five dollars a householdThey're out of their mind for expecting people to pay $20/month for 4K.
Hasn't changed, most content they show even with their name on it is from other producers, some of it is partnered so it will remain on Netflix, or they have exclusive rights to play TV series content for a given time period. To use the Korean TV series examples, Netflix is how a huge number of viewers are being reached outside Korea. I often thought of Netflix as a huge worldwide superstation of sorts for all the partnering going on all the time.Does Netflix still license shows, or is it all originals now? I haven’t checked in a while. I remember back in 2016 or 2017 they had said that by 2022 or 2023 it would be purely their own content.
Should we discuss how much people spend on a cup of coffee during the month. It's either worth it or it isn't. Streaming is not cheap in the end, you tend to spend more because you want more until you realize you're happy with less. Still good free sites with lots of ads.If they keep on charging extra for higher screen resolution. They will continue to lose more subscribers.
And they keep canceling shows...It's because they are one of the only streaming holdouts that want to charge for 4K...in 2022.
Maybe you shouldn’t be sharing your password and this wouldn’t be happening. Love, Netflix.Fewer subscribers -> less money -> less money to plow into content -> fewer subscribers?
Did you ever read The Netflix Nightmare: What Happens When an Industry Becomes a Squid Game - Variety 4/21Netflix really needs to stop blaming the consumers and they should focus on the actual "High Quality/Level Content" they should be making.
The reality is more complicated. Since streamers came to dominate the landscape, the assumption has been that broadcast TV is seriously endangered—that it’s struggling to reach new generations of viewers, partly because of its risk-averse rules and its devotion to broad, inoffensive content. That existential threat is real. But some see a worrisome irony emerging: The streamers are acting more and more like the cautious industry they revolutionized. Streamers are pursuing what they call “elevated broadcast,” making sitcoms, dramas, procedurals, and reality TV central to their platforms. Some also appear to be pulling back from the challenging content that attracted audiences in hopes of scooping up every viewer the networks have left.
Insiders say streaming executives are becoming less adventurous—or more populist, depending on your point of view—because they’re spooked by the overcrowded market and uncertain about how to keep expanding (and retaining) their subscriber bases. Netflix’s stock price plunged after an earnings report projected a loss of 2 million global subscribers by June. A top executive there also said that they are exploring a lower-priced subscription that would include commercials. “I’m always a little bit worried that half the streamers will go away at a certain point,” says Alan Yang, cocreator of unconventional comedies like Netflix’s Master of None, Amazon’s Forever, and Apple TV+’s upcoming Loot. “Can the market sustain all of them spending the way they are and making the number of shows that they make?”