I believe this was the exact moment we should have expected it, and it didn't happen. They're unlikely to put out a rMBP with ARM.It's time Apple ditches Intel and swaps to ARM.
Why do I need this since I have the laptop replacement (ipad pro 9.7)?
ipad pro is for those users who still on their over 5 years old pc.That is funny! According to Apple you do not, since like you said the iPad Pro 9.7 with keyboard is a laptop replacement.![]()
And just behind the 2.4ghz i5 late 2013 13" rMBP that's still my daily driver.As noted above, this puts the new 1.2 GHz Skylake rMB just ahead of the 2015 MBA on CPU power and I believe the HD515 GPU is just behind the HD6000 GPU from the MBA so gaming performance will be a bit worse.
The reality is this is a perfectly fine option to recommend to family members.
Do you have a source for your claim, or is it just hot air?The way Intel strong-armed Apple to use these chips there's no one else to blame
TB3 would require re-architecturing of the motherboard - an additional chip - since it isn't supported natively on Skylake. Apple wouldn't go so far out of their way for it during a silent refresh, especially given their pride on the size and efficiency, and probably doesn't mind waiting until Kaby.
Take a look at the logic board in the Macbook and tell me where you would put the TB controller. I'll wait.
If you find a spot for it, tell me how you'd power it too, given how thirsty it is.
u cant compare a V8 with a V12, both from present. If you need a MBP than buy the new MBPAnd just behind the 2.4ghz i5 late 2013 13" rMBP that's still my daily driver.
I get that this is light and all, but the CPU and GPU performance remains massively underwhelming.
Maybe that's fine for some, I dunno. I wouldn't step back in power from a 3 year old laptop that was only mid/high end in 2013.
I just struggle to see where I would recommend this over the cheaper Air. Retina display but weaker graphics, slower CPU, less battery life and the 12" Macbook costs $100 more than the 13" Air with the same RAM and Flash Storage...what's to like?
thin but wider...so it more space for motherboard...issue with the space for motherboard is the length not the thickness. And boy, plz buy your new spectre...after 10 min at paris...i sayd Apple is know what is doing, and they are still the perfect balance from perf per inch per construction point of viewDoesn't make it any less mind boggling that it doesn't have TB3. And FWIW HP's new Spectre laptop -- allegedly the thinnest in the world does have TB 3 so there is that. I'm no HP fan, but from an engineering perspective don't say it's not possible because HP did, albeit with a different CPU. Yes, Apple never designed for TB3 with this iteration. Again, $1600 is a lot of money for a computer with a lot of other things missing. It's got panache, but in a Porsche 944 kind of way.
Apple states a faster SSD as well. Any benchmarks on that?
480p camera on a retina display is just bonkers.
We have to blame Intel and not Apple for this. The tick tock cycle is changing per Intel.