Apple is being quite stingy. Just add that extra usb port and I might buy it
A nice change that critique gets more stage time these days.So reaction from MacRumors forum members is now worthy of a front page story? Did anyone seriously think Apple would redesign this laptop only one year after release? The MBA had 3 spec bumps before it was redesigned in 2010.
Seriously contemplating selling my Macbook 12" now to get a Thinkpad x1 carbon or yoga (to replace the portable Macbook) and keep my Macbook Pro 15 as main machine. The Macbook 12" is nice, I liked it, but after a while, the arrow keys are driving me nuts. Things are getting fun at the Microsoft camp and Ubuntu is growing on me, decisions, decisions...
You are comparing a 28W quad-core with a 5W dual-core. Intel's CPU improvements have been mostly focused on power consumption and graphics in recent years.my 2011 Quad core i7 MBP scores 2265 and 8103 in Geek Bench 3 on the Intel 3000.... This seems kinda slow for the pricing... or is it just me? Have i missed something?
I personally just wanted 16gb of RAM and 1 additional USB-C port...USB C is nice - I just don't like the 1 port...I always found myself needing 2, even though I have a few adapters.
An advantage to buying a powerful computer is that you don't need to upgrade anytime soon.Yes, you've missed the point entirely. Core-M is not supposed to compete with a 45w quad core processor. How much does your MBP weigh? How often do you actually use the power of that processor in any meaningful way? If you are like the bulk of computer users, I'd wager it's less than 5% of the time, likely less than 1% of the time. Core-M is built to meet modern needs. Small, power efficient, quiet, and extremely fast in short bursts (such as loading a complex web page) which is exactly what most computer users of today need. If that is not you, or if you have a need for a computer in your life that doesn't fit that mold, no problem. There are still tons of options available for you out there, and maybe a Core-M device might fit well even for you as a mobile device.
It's not about the camera. Your paying a thousand dollars for a premium computer. You are expected to receive premium hardware. Apple doesn't care anymore. That's why people are complaining. What a crap upgrade.I don't care what people say, yes it's nice to have the perfmance boost, but the fact that a modern computer DOESN'T have an HD camera is the most idiotic thing I've seen today....
The significantly faster SSD is tempting, though.
[doublepost=1461091390][/doublepost]
Plus, Apple would need to re-write OSX and get developers to re-write all their apps. We would lose Windows 10 compatibility, as well.
I am honestly confused by people complaining about the 480p camera like that's a big deal. Who is seriously using their Macs camera for anything other than simple business meetings or family chats? Is that really the big thing people complain about?
my 2011 Quad core i7 MBP scores 2265 and 8103 in Geek Bench 3 on the Intel 3000.... This seems kinda slow for the pricing... or is it just me? Have i missed something?
The significantly faster SSD is tempting, though.
There's more than just GeekBench. I believe ArsTechnica or a similar site ran a battery of tests and the Core M (last year's) ran circles around the A9X.
Is this the smallest performance jump year over year we have ever seen in a mac lineup?
AnandTech:
Ultimately I think it’s reasonable to say that Intel’s Core M processors hold a CPU performance edge over iPad Pro and the A9X SoC. Against Intel’s slowest chips A9X is competitive, but as it stands A9X can’t keep up with the faster chips. However by the same metric there’s no question that Apple is closing the gap; A9X can compete with both Broadwell and Skylake Core M processors, and that’s something Apple couldn’t claim even a generation ago. That it’s only against the likes of Core m3 means that Apple still has a way to go, particularly as A9X still loses by more than it wins, but it’s significant progress in a short period of time. And I’ll wager that it’s closer than Intel would like to be, especially if Apple puts A9X into a cheaper iPad Air in the future..
You are receiving premium hardware. The 2015 MacBook was one of the first to use NVMe and Apple STILL found a way to make write speeds 80% faster this year. The display is highly rated for its accuracy and gamut. The CPU is just as pricey as the 15W Skylake chips. The battery is bigger than in many notebooks that weigh 50% more.It's not about the camera. Your paying a thousand dollars for a premium computer. You are expected to receive premium hardware. Apple doesn't care anymore. That's why people are complaining. What a crap upgrade.
It's comparable to the jumps between Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge, Haswell, and Broadwell in the MacBook Airs and Pros. The last "big leap" was from Core 2 Duo to Sandy Bridge. Intel's been focused mostly on graphics performance and power consumption in recent years.Is this the smallest performance jump year over year we have ever seen in a mac lineup?
I am glad to see Apple updated the 12" MB with the newer processor. I purchased the 12" when it came out last year and have used it at least 5 days a seince then. As far as "pro" computing goes it does the jobe very well for most tasks.
I edited a 5 minute video recently with FCP and it worked great.
Code everyday with Xcode, no problems.
Use multiple programs at same time, Word and others, no problems.
Yes I am a "Pro" user.
Now if I were to edit a full length video this would not be the computer for that task, but it would handle it better than an iPad Pro.
The bottom line is, will I get the new model for the boosts in performance? Probably not, but maybe.
As far as this thread goes, it appears there is a whole lot of people who just want to bash Apple, but you all are quite entertaining.
Apple is being quite stingy. Just add that extra usb port and I might buy it