If this was an Air they could've selected a weaker processor and in consequence reduce the battery a bit, making it lighter and cheaper.
Except that they did choose the same processor class, the 15-W TDP 'U'-class CPUs, as the MBA line has used all along.
Releasing these two macbook pros that are slightly different muddles the marketing, keeping the old laptops tarnishes their reputation for latest technology. I'm makes people weary of buying an outdated mac.
The problem is that a retina MBA would look pretty much like the entry-level 13" MBP. It's the same CPU class, the same integrated GPU class, the very similar battery life. Maybe an 'true' retina MBA would gotten an SSD that is not quite as fast (the MBA did a slower SSD than the 13" MBP), maybe it would gotten TB3 and USB-C a year or two later (the MBA did USB3 and TB2 a year or two later than the MBP), but USB-C is switch Apple would have very likely wanted to make even for a new retina MBA this year.
And Broadwell laptops, the currently sold 13" MBA and 2015 13" MBP, aren't massively outdated compared to Skylake given the limited performance gains Intel is making per generation. Their SSDs are still among the best as well.
[doublepost=1477960917][/doublepost]
Is canon lake not next in line? Haha it's hard to keep up. I find if your the "oh I'll just wait for the next chip to release" type that you'll never end up buying anything. Take the plunge now.
Yup, we used to have two of each, two 'bridges' (Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge), two 'wells' (Haswell, Broadwell), but we will have many more 'lakes' (Skylake, Caby Lake, Cannonlake, Coffee Lake, Icelake, Tigerlake). And don't ask me by what rule the 'lakes' are written as one word or as two.
[doublepost=1477961225][/doublepost]
I agree that the goal for Apple is too make money, but this is an odd situation where they really didn't have to innovate this time to make it thinner... they used the latest Intel to get an automatic reduction in power, they reduced the size of the battery significantly, and they removed all the guts needed to have various IO ports.
They are no longer trying to hide that it's a money grab since they believe people will still buy it. Isn't this what happened with the first iPhone. It was something like $600 to start and in two months they dropped the price to $400 and gave all early adopters a $200 refund. I feel like this may happen here cause a lot of internet chatter is showing that people are not spending that kind of money for something that is labeled is "Pro", is about the same level of capability as the MB Air, which is not "Pro". Just an interesting phenomenon happening here.
I cannot shake the feeling that 90% of the misery here is caused by people having to buy new cables and a couple of adaptors. And that people are more upset about spending $150 on cables and adaptors than by spending twice ($300) due to the price increase of the actual laptop.
[doublepost=1477961292][/doublepost]
Some people should buy it then, But it does not work for me. They need to offer faster processor and more ram in the same design. If that kills battery life, then let me choose since I could care less about batter life and would gladly buy a laptop without a battery if they offered it. Or if they are still stuck on this battery thing then offer a bigger package with bigger battery.
Yeah, have you ever seen an Apple product offered in two different battery sizes?
[doublepost=1477961552][/doublepost]
They have done it before though. The late-2008 MacBook was nearly identical to the 2009-2012 MacBook Pros.
Yes, but they didn't offer the same design in parallel in two different product lines. There is a difference between reclassifying a product (they added FW800 as a 'justification') and selling it under two names.