Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I was watching a Computer World Facebook Live discussion about this revision. Both the iPhone 7 and the 2016 MacBook Pro are post Steve Jobs devices. You are looking at the first devices Steve Jobs never got the chance to influence. I am happy to have jumped in last year with the Early 2015 13 in MacBook Pro. Its just the right pricing (still expensive), right set of ports and its super fast. If you really want to get the best value for money, you will have to move up to the Touch Bar included 13 inch. Its such a shame Apple is charging an even "extra" premium for it. To be honest, I would just purchase last years model, either new or refurb or wait for Kabylake models next year or just hold out until Icelake or Tigerlake.
Is canon lake not next in line? Haha it's hard to keep up. I find if your the "oh I'll just wait for the next chip to release" type that you'll never end up buying anything. Take the plunge now.
 
It is obvious that Macbook Pro this time around stands for 'Prosumer' and not 'Professional'.

When the unibody Air and Pro were released in 2008 nothing like them had come before and they set the benchmark for the entire industry. These pro models will certainly not have the same effect and just like everything else post-Steve these releases are simply evolutionary rather than revolutionary.
 
If this was an Air they could've selected a weaker processor and in consequence reduce the battery a bit, making it lighter and cheaper.
Except that they did choose the same processor class, the 15-W TDP 'U'-class CPUs, as the MBA line has used all along.

Releasing these two macbook pros that are slightly different muddles the marketing, keeping the old laptops tarnishes their reputation for latest technology. I'm makes people weary of buying an outdated mac.
The problem is that a retina MBA would look pretty much like the entry-level 13" MBP. It's the same CPU class, the same integrated GPU class, the very similar battery life. Maybe an 'true' retina MBA would gotten an SSD that is not quite as fast (the MBA did a slower SSD than the 13" MBP), maybe it would gotten TB3 and USB-C a year or two later (the MBA did USB3 and TB2 a year or two later than the MBP), but USB-C is switch Apple would have very likely wanted to make even for a new retina MBA this year.

And Broadwell laptops, the currently sold 13" MBA and 2015 13" MBP, aren't massively outdated compared to Skylake given the limited performance gains Intel is making per generation. Their SSDs are still among the best as well.
[doublepost=1477960917][/doublepost]
Is canon lake not next in line? Haha it's hard to keep up. I find if your the "oh I'll just wait for the next chip to release" type that you'll never end up buying anything. Take the plunge now.
Yup, we used to have two of each, two 'bridges' (Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge), two 'wells' (Haswell, Broadwell), but we will have many more 'lakes' (Skylake, Caby Lake, Cannonlake, Coffee Lake, Icelake, Tigerlake). And don't ask me by what rule the 'lakes' are written as one word or as two.
[doublepost=1477961225][/doublepost]
I agree that the goal for Apple is too make money, but this is an odd situation where they really didn't have to innovate this time to make it thinner... they used the latest Intel to get an automatic reduction in power, they reduced the size of the battery significantly, and they removed all the guts needed to have various IO ports.
They are no longer trying to hide that it's a money grab since they believe people will still buy it. Isn't this what happened with the first iPhone. It was something like $600 to start and in two months they dropped the price to $400 and gave all early adopters a $200 refund. I feel like this may happen here cause a lot of internet chatter is showing that people are not spending that kind of money for something that is labeled is "Pro", is about the same level of capability as the MB Air, which is not "Pro". Just an interesting phenomenon happening here.
I cannot shake the feeling that 90% of the misery here is caused by people having to buy new cables and a couple of adaptors. And that people are more upset about spending $150 on cables and adaptors than by spending twice ($300) due to the price increase of the actual laptop.
[doublepost=1477961292][/doublepost]
Some people should buy it then, But it does not work for me. They need to offer faster processor and more ram in the same design. If that kills battery life, then let me choose since I could care less about batter life and would gladly buy a laptop without a battery if they offered it. Or if they are still stuck on this battery thing then offer a bigger package with bigger battery.
Yeah, have you ever seen an Apple product offered in two different battery sizes?
[doublepost=1477961552][/doublepost]
They have done it before though. The late-2008 MacBook was nearly identical to the 2009-2012 MacBook Pros.
Yes, but they didn't offer the same design in parallel in two different product lines. There is a difference between reclassifying a product (they added FW800 as a 'justification') and selling it under two names.
 
So...
(1) no performance improvement
(2) no battery life improvement
but
(3) slightly thinner

Sounds about right.

And this is why I'll keep on plugging away on my older iMac that actually has ports and my Macbook Pro that has those too! All they need is a little wakeup from an SSD and maybe some ram and they are good to go. I love my iMac. Until they get their stuff together and get past this whole "designing for experience thing" my wallet will continue to have no urge to come out and play.

All in all, I think I'm in a good phase of the product lineup. They are near the anorexic stage and then hopefully someone will remind them they are still pretty if they have a couple of mm's here or there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nt5672
I'm still happy with my base Early 2015 13" MacBook Pro. I use it for portability and battery life but I do need USB for USB to RS232 at times to setup an older Crestron or AMX system's ethernet settings. The newer Crestron and AMX systems use a USB B connector so I use USB A To B cables. I see no benefit in "upgrading". I don't care at all about cutting a few millimeters of thickness off of a already super thin design.

Not to mention Apple removed the SD card. What was the use of flush SD cards for more permanent storage options killing the Apple bank accounts that badly? Maybe if they sold something more then 128GB for a reasonable price it wouldn't have been a issue.

I think my next laptop is either going to be some variant of the Razer Blade or Microsoft Surfacebook when the time comes at this rate.
 
I can present a case for the removal of the magsafe in favor of USB-c. We have notebooks that are getting lighter and lighter and in order for the magsafe to release on snagging, the magnets have to be made weaker. At a certain point you compromise the connection and run the risk of it being too flimsy and falling out in regular use. So if you have to go with another power connector that isn't magnetic you have 2 options, go proprietary or go with a universal standard. Universal standard makes more sense especially in the context of the mac. Further, you have data transfer so you've potentially addressed having multiple cables connecting to your notebook when at a workstation. Fewer ports as is the case with the MacBook allows for more space allocated to battery in an already thinning device. USB-c is also an upcoming standard that all new devices will likely eventually support.

The really compelling case for USB-C power is the fact this it is likely to become the much sought-after "universal power standard", at least for laptop computers and phones. I've occasionally been stuck when I'd left my Apple power supply at home, or a meeting has gone on longer than planned and I'm short of battery life. We will now have a much better chance of someone else (non-Mac user) having a USB-C charger, and finding power ports in other devices such as monitors.

I think Apple should certainly include a magnetic "break-apart" option like Griffin's to keep the MagSafe feature. It would be a win-win situation.
 
Is canon lake not next in line? Haha it's hard to keep up. I find if your the "oh I'll just wait for the next chip to release" type that you'll never end up buying anything. Take the plunge now.

While I typically agree with you in this, sometimes it does pay to pay attn to specs and wait it out. Prime example is a Macbook that is sitting next to me that was the first unibody that lacked FireWire. It still "looks" modern but I told my sister not to buy it due to the limited ports. We still use multiple FireWire HD's.

Pouring salt in the wound was when my mom would get out her iBook and hook up to the HD via FireWire or not as relevant but the external iSight camera! Haha. Still have one of those.
 
I waited 6 months for the new Macbook Pro to replace my 2010 Macbook Air. Unimpressed with the new models, especially the price. Just ordered a refurbished 2015 Macbook Pro for about $1189.
 
Lol how incredibly WEAK. Let me get this straight. Apple took out half the features, kept performance the same, and increased the price? o_O
 
  • Like
Reactions: nt5672
Of course i could not have used one.

I have used PC laptops with digital function keys and hated it, my opinion is based on using a laptop with non switch based function keys. For someone who touch types .... I see no use case for my needs.

I also love mechanical keyboards and much much prefer my 2012 rMBP KB to my 12" MacBook . If the new MacBook Pro kb is anything like the MacBook kb, that's also a major step backwards.

I will though try one , but I have my reservations , and for the new uk price is better be a big upgrade.


There is no question it is different. Typing on it now. It is of course toward that direction, but, it is quite a bit better. The MB should have been made like this one. I looked into it and grabbed screenshots showing this:

MacBook: Notice the X shaped dome
Screen Shot 2016-10-31 at 7.49.34 PM.png

New MacBook Pros: Notice the full circular dome
Screen Shot 2016-10-31 at 7.51.32 PM.png

After using this keyboard for a day then trying out an old Air at the store, the old keyboards feel like they are off of a typwriter. For some people that might be a good thing I guess, but I do like the new slimmed down form.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 840quadra and MH01
Again, your opinion is based on something you haven't even tried.

I have a laptop with digital function keys for work. Hate the implementation, and the often dim-whitted or lack of response from it. That said, I am also keeping my mind open that this is completely different. In the MBP case, it is a multitouch display strip with adaptive touch controls, I don't expect it to be anything like the static control strip on my work laptop.



I too dislike the MacBook keyboard and share your reservations on it. I hope the next generation of this type of keyboard has a better feel, but am not going to pass judgement on it until I try it.

But of course , we have hundreds maybe thousands of posts on the MacBook Pro based on our opinions, be it positive , negative or question marks , its all based on the limited information we have been provided. I like physical keys.....therefore I have never liked the idea of the display strip .

I had rhe same view point about multi touch track pad and also 3D Touch , and two this day it's features I don't use, and even without trying it, I know it's a gimmick , I'm actually looking for a used 2015 top spec machine while I have the new machine on pre-order cause I see it as much better value, and I really dislike the concept of not having physical function keys. As I said , nothing beats an excellent quality mechanical keyboard for me, a 12 MacBook KB is a major step backwards , and styling on paper, while loosing physical keys is even worse.

Is it a huge deal, no , I can just ignore it, but I'm paying a premium for something I don't need or want. I can see it being a emoji bar for many.

One thing I still have to research is the Touch ID implementation , if it offers the same security benefits like the iPhone .
 
After my initial disappointment and shock at the price, I am warming to the idea of the base MBP 13. It's more a replacement for the MBA in my mind (15W CPU, fewer ports than the rMBPs), and I suppose the price increase for the better screen, faster SSD, new ports, trackpad etc is *just about* justifiable. Battery life may end up close to the MBA in practice, and the performance appears to be better.

It has one advantage in that it can upgraded to 16GB RAM which I find makes quite a lot of difference for my usage.

It is still expensive though (although as pointed out, the same price as the previous rMBP 13 upgraded to a 256GB SSD), and very expensive in Australia.

However, looking at the competition (XPS 13, Surface Pro 4), it's often about the same price, so the decision is not clear cut. Dell tend to have discounts & offers though. At the moment XPS 13 with Kaby Lake i7, 16GB, 512GB, touch screen is AU$2549 now. A similar spec'd MBP 13 is AU$3,319 - that's nearly $800 cheaper. The SP4 is AU$3,399 - even more than the MBP 13. For some reason MS charge AU$600 to upgrade from 256GB to 512GB SSD!
 
Is canon lake not next in line? Haha it's hard to keep up. I find if your the "oh I'll just wait for the next chip to release" type that you'll never end up buying anything. Take the plunge now.
I had my eyes set on buying a Mac from 2012, but I said, let me wait this out a bit more. The 15 inch remained stuck on Haswell, so I said, let me go with the 13 inch instead, since it will only be a generation behind.
 
I had my eyes set on buying a Mac from 2012, but I said, let me wait this out a bit more. The 15 inch remained stuck on Haswell, so I said, let me go with the 13 inch instead, since it will only be a generation behind.

That 13" Broadwell is still considerably slower than the 15" Haswell model. Don't get too caught up in the name if speed is what you're looking at because Intel really aren't improving IPC for a few years now and there's nothing on the horizon that really changes that up much. If you're looking for off the plug efficiency then, sure, you'll squeak out an extra few percent from a newer gen and lower power model like the 13" has vs the 15"
 
But of course , we have hundreds maybe thousands of posts on the MacBook Pro based on our opinions, be it positive , negative or question marks , its all based on the limited information we have been provided. I like physical keys.....therefore I have never liked the idea of the display strip .

I had rhe same view point about multi touch track pad and also 3D Touch , and two this day it's features I don't use, and even without trying it, I know it's a gimmick , I'm actually looking for a used 2015 top spec machine while I have the new machine on pre-order cause I see it as much better value, and I really dislike the concept of not having physical function keys. As I said , nothing beats an excellent quality mechanical keyboard for me, a 12 MacBook KB is a major step backwards , and styling on paper, while loosing physical keys is even worse.

Is it a huge deal, no , I can just ignore it, but I'm paying a premium for something I don't need or want. I can see it being a emoji bar for many.

One thing I still have to research is the Touch ID implementation , if it offers the same security benefits like the iPhone .

At the end of the day, the computers you use, have to be liked by you and fit your needs. I misjudged the first post of yours that I quoted, as you discounting and dismissing something (like many on here do) without giving it a chance or trying it.

Me personally, I love my multitouch trackpad (nice for photo / video work for me), and find 3D Touch hard to live without when I have my iPad. Those items have become part of my workflow, so, if the function keys are like that to you, I understand and sympathize with your dislike for that change.

The hardest thing I have had to deal with in my years of using Apple, is them dropping the MightyMouse. Laugh if you like, but love that form factor, and can fly through some tasks with it better than the magic mouse, and I liked the hand feel much better.

I guess it's a good thing I purchased a few as spares ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: aristobrat and MH01
So the new 2.0 ghz 15W i5 runs neck and neck with the old 3.1 ghz 28W i7, and people find that disappointing?

I'm as dismayed as anyone at the pricing of the new MacBook pros, but if we put price aside and look at pure performance, I don't see a problem with the new low end i5 running basically even with the old high end i7. (Though, I will admit, it's easier for the new one to look good since apple skipped broadwell entirely on the MacBook Pro line, we're thus comparing low end skylake to high end haswell)
 
  • Like
Reactions: hj576
At the end of the day, the computers you use, have to be liked by you and fit your needs. I misjudged the first post of yours that I quoted, as you discounting and dismissing something (like many on here do) without giving it a chance or trying it.

Me personally, I love my multitouch trackpad (nice for photo / video work for me), and find 3D Touch hard to live without when I have my iPad. Those items have become part of my workflow, so, if the function keys are like that to you, I understand and sympathize with your dislike for that change.

The hardest thing I have had to deal with in my years of using Apple, is them dropping the MightyMouse. Laugh if you like, but love that form factor, and can fly through some tasks with it better than the magic mouse, and I liked the hand feel much better.

I guess it's a good thing I purchased a few as spares ;)

I have a sin.... I prefer the Mighty Mouse , and really dislike the Magic Mouse with a passion, again cause I like physical buttons :) my worst apple product was the shuffle 3rd gen, horrible product without intuitive physical controls on the device.

I have a MacBook Pro on order so will try it, but I suspect I will be connecting my daskeyboard to it. Though let's I think I'm just getting old and grumpy .....one of my favourite macs is the 2012 Mac mini....miss my powerful upgradable macs
 
Well, maybe they should have an Air update, but this entry 13" MacBook Pro is much better than the machine it replaces - it is in no way a "marginal" update... Again, much brighter, accurate and efficient display, much larger and improved trackpad, much smaller in all dimensions, much lighter, 2 state-of-the-art connectors, much better speakers, better graphics, faster memory, faster SSD, faster overall than the previous model and almost as fast as the much more expensive high-end previous model - how is all of this considered "marginal"? WTF were you expecting? Remember - the old model was no slouch!

...and $300 more expensive. People have an expectation that this years model will be better than last year, at the same price. There is now nothing at the old rMBP 13 entry/mid-range Air price point.

Also, this one is particularly tight on ports - 4xTB3 will be fine down the line once you've bought the right cables and adapters and the USBC ecosystem has matured a bit - 2 (and nothing else) is always going to be tight. That's another thing that makes this an Air replacement rather than a MBP.
 
Performance per watt is much higher but is offset by a lower clock speed and a smaller battery. The net result is a thinner and lighter notebook that is about the same speed as last year's with no improvement in battery life. Not sure how many users will find value in the upgrade from the 2015 model - might appeal to those with earlier models though, who were due for an upgrade anyway.
Same thing with iPads. We are 7 generations in but battery life is still 10 hours because Apple shrinks the battery at the same time they made efficiency improvements to the display and SoC.
 
CPU and Ram would determine the day to day speed of a system, perhaps 20 years ago, but not as much today.

I don't think it's as long as 20 years ago. I added RAM to a PC 10 years ago, and it made a huge difference to the Sony Viao desktop I had at the time. It became like a new machine.

I then switched to Macs in 2008. I maxed out the RAM in the first one, because I didn't know any better. I haven't bothered since. In real world comparisons with people with standard MacBooks it didn't make a noticeable difference. It was faster, but not by much, and my real world usage requirements don't require the difference.


Honestly I hope they can provide a software update allowing for users to move the standard Dock from the main screen, and down to this control strip.

I think that is a very interesting idea for the Touch Bar. It could be revealed in a swipe up option from whatever programme / app you are using.

The really compelling case for USB-C power is the fact this it is likely to become the much sought-after "universal power standard", at least for laptop computers and phones. I've occasionally been stuck when I'd left my Apple power supply at home, or a meeting has gone on longer than planned and I'm short of battery life. We will now have a much better chance of someone else (non-Mac user) having a USB-C charger, and finding power ports in other devices such as monitors.


I've had that situation too. And with digital working, it can be a serious issue. A world with standard power ports will make so many things so much easier.


I think Apple should certainly include a magnetic "break-apart" option like Griffin's to keep the MagSafe feature. It would be a win-win situation.

I agree with you again, my friend. I love the MagSafe feature. I will miss it on my next MacBook.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.