I really like using my 16” MBP at about 800 to 1000 nits using Vivid. Content looks absolutely amazing, like it’s practically leaping off the screen. It’s hard to understand if you haven’t witnessed it firsthand. It’s a real game changer.I wonder if you guys actually use your displays at peak brightness...
Not great? The M2 series added wifi 6E, the first upgrade to MBP Wifi speeds in a decade, plus HDMI 2.1 finally enabling the use of 8K displays (and 4K at beyond 60 Hz aka Promotion).My M1 14" MBPro Max also has 500 nits max as did the M2 series.
As an interesting exercise, go to the Compare Mac models and put in M1 14" MBPro Pro and Max, M2 14" MBPro Pro and Max and M3 14" MBPro Pro and Max. The hardware changes are not great between each year.
I have many friends with blue eyes and when they see my iPhone cranked up to 1000 nits SDR, not only do they not complain, but rather they frequently comment on how amazing and “real” the display looks.This. Light eyed people need sunglasses to not be squinting at these crazy bright displays.
On a bright sunny day when sitting near a window I might need 80% brightness, but in home/office environments I have always used my displays with brightness well below half. Tonight my iMac brightness is set to 1 bar (out of 16).I wonder if you guys actually use your displays at peak brightness...
I wonder if you guys actually use your displays at peak brightness...
Is there any downside besides battery life? Does it risk shortening the life of the display?I’ve been running my M1 Max at 1600 nits all day with BetterDisplay for a year now so…
Battery life is definitely shorter but it makes working outside an absolute joy. Doubtful on it shortening life of the display. Who’s to say someone doesn’t enjoy watching HDR movies all day? Functionally that would be the same as what betterdisplay is doing.Is there any downside besides battery life? Does it risk shortening the life of the display?
It is not lying. In nits, the screen measures 20% brighter. Nits are a common and acceptable measurement for brightness. It is not the only way to measure brightness, but it is among the most common for screens. Perception, complexities in objective brightness, and how easy it is to tell the difference are a separate matter.Apple is straight up lying saying that 600nits is 20% brighter than 500 nits. That’s just not true as light does not increase linearly, but according to a power law.
It’s actually about 5% brighter, and it’s unlikely that anyone is a normally lit room could tell the difference between 500 and 600 nits.
That would be a very dumb thing to do. You would be losing half of your ram if you go with the base model.I wonder how much I can trade in my 14' M1 Pro for at Apple. With the M3 at $1,500 and a $900 gift card. I might get one!
BetterDisplay.Can the M1 M2 just software unlock 600nits? I mean my 14 can go up to 1600nits HDR no problems.
But only during the daytime, right?
You would be insane to crank that nit level at night!
Only when the display has accumulated too much dust on itI wonder if you guys actually use your displays at peak brightness...
One thing to increase via dedicated app, totally another story when it’s implemented on a hardware level!This isn't a hardware feature, there are a bunch apps that can increase the SDR brightness. I use BetterDisplay to do 160%.