"Pro" written on a product has never meant more than "more expensive and (allegedly) better than the one without 'Pro'". Apple have been a bit confused and inconsistent about what tags like "pro" and "air" (which has wobbled between 'premium ultra-portable' and 'economy') mean - but then most of the competition think that "TZ3956-B/Z" is a sexy product name so...
...and in terms of customers, "pro" only reliably means that you're getting paid, although there's a fixation in this group (...and also at Apple when they're not using 'pro' just to mean 'premium') that you're not a "pro" unless you're rendering 3D video in 8k.
But, looking at the products that are aimed at... people with demanding computer needs... we have:
- the classic Mac Pro - basically left to wither on the vine after ~2010 (and discontinued in Europe shorty after) with no hint of an upgrade
- the Mac Pro "cylinder" - radical design simply not suitable for some users' purposes (acknowledged 5 years later by Apple) and basically abandoned with no alternative available for 6 years
- the MacBook Pro - allowed to become thoroughly out-of-date by 2016, then replaced overnight with a radical re-design with no de-facto-standard ports and a keyboard which was, at best, love-it-or-hate-it, at worst may have serious design flaws that cause regular failures in some environments.
- XServe - cancelled overnight - no alternative. Yes, folks, a desktop computer with a rack mounting bracket may be convenient if you're combining it with rackmount video/audio gear but its not the same as a purpose-designed server. May be justified in that "nobody needs a server running MacOS any more - you can do everything with Linux" - but if you're that nobody, you're stuffed.
- iMac Pro - well, we'll see if it gets at least a GPU upgrade this year...
So, basically, if you are a pro, why would you invest time and money on a platform with such a dismal track record of creating and abandoning "pro" products and forcing drastic workflow changes on users? Remember - being a "pro" can mean considerations like - can you quickly buy a new set of up-to-date, but compatible, kit if your computer is damaged/stolen, or a new person joins the team? What will be the choice in 3 years time when the lease is up/you've finished reclaiming the tax etc.? Who gets to decide when you have a major rethink of your workflow - you or Apple?
Also - Apple simply don't/can't/won't produce a basic workhorse 'pickup truck' computer - whenever they try these days they end up with a gull-winged sports SUV, like the Trashcan (...and, to a certain extent, the new Mac Pro although my main gripe with that is the lousy bang/buck ratio of the entry level model).
Go with HP/Dell etc. and you can be reasonably sure that they won't suddenly drop their basic, workhorse computers in favour of a piece of contemporary metal sculpture... and even if they do there are plenty of other PC makers who will build something to your exact specs.
Professionally I don't, Apple's burnt too many bridges to trust as a provider of professional hardware. Privately still mildly interested at best, and that rests firmly with Apple. Just find it a little sad that they feel the need to annotate their product's in such a manner...
Professional's choose the best hardware for their needs, as for Apple looking forward to Emoji Pro and watchband Pro
Q-6