Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So the new M2/16GB/512GB Mini that I ordered (and is arriving tomorrow) will be slower than my 2014 Mini? Hm.
I would still test it out and see how it performs. At the end of the day, it is still running the new M2 chip. I wonder if you are going to take advantage of this? hmm 😣

1674596543553.png
 
I today purchased at my local Apple Store a new Mac Mini M2 Pro (10 core CPU, 16 core GPU) $1,299 model. It has 512GB SSD, and I was surprised to find the SSD disk read and write speed at about 3,000 MB/s each. This compares with M2 Pro and M2 Max Macbook Pros I watched reviews on with about 6,000 MB/s. I wish Apple would have disclosed this, as my only option now is to order a BTO (Build To Order) custom Mac Mini to rectify this problem (and wait for them to send it to me from the factory in China.)

This appears to mean that all of the Mac Mini M2, and Mac Mini M2 Pro models, that are in stock at stores, will have either the 1,500 MB/s limit on 256GB SSD models, and around 3,000 MB/s limit on 512GB SSD models.

Influencers who received 1TB or larger SSD Mac Mini M2 Pro review models are reporting the normal 6,000+ MB/s SSD disk speed.
 
This isn't surprising. You are getting a single SSD instead of two.

1500 MB / sec is still very fast; twice as fast as a typical HDD. I doubt most people will be affected as anyone who needs speeds faster will be using an external drive. I have several for multi-cam editing and, as I've mentioned numerous times on these forums, you shouldn't be using your boot drive as a scratch drive.
Twice? Where can I get one of those speedy typical HDD's :p
 
I thought we already went over this with the M2 Air.
It literally does not matter for real-world use cases.
Worry more about your RAM.

Absolutely.
Worrying about this is a nothing burger imo.
This simply doesn't matter at all in a real world usecase, AND they lowered the price.
If they hadn't lowered the price I feel like it would have been a bigger issue, but do you guys really think a 100$ more expensive baseprice is worth it to get a slightly higher number in some benchmark software?

Moving large files will be slower, but you have the 250gb model. All of those big file transfters are gonna be on external media anyways

In summery: Yeah but, It's 100$ cheaper. Who cares.
 
I was waiting for this tragic news. So the $100 price drop on the base-spec M2 was meaningless. I'd probably recommend a 2nd-hand base M1 now.
M2 model still is much better, and even half speed SSD is quite fast. Until few years ago it was sci-go to think about a 2GB/s disk speed. Even a 1GB/s is more than enough for many use cases.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.