Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think the reason a lot of people are annoyed (well, maybe just me...) is that the only SSD Apple are offering is 256GB. Cracking the case open on an iMac is a pain, so I think many people would be prepared to pay the 'Apple premium' on a 128GB/64GB drive because if it's alongside a 1/2TB disk size isn't so crucial. I for one would be happy to stump some cash for a smaller drive, but £600 is painful. It's only £49 less than the cost of a Mac Mini in the UK!
 
Okay, this is just horrible! There's no way to explain this as anything but a big fat "screw the consumer", and I for one - a huge Apple fan - really hate it when they pull this crap.

They are not pulling off anything.

I wish all those conspiracy theorists out there would just go and jump off a freakin cliff. Industrial design is all about compromises. Even a 1 mm extra might pose a significant hurdle to a certain design. Being able to "add your own" was simply not worth it for the small number of users that want to use their own SSD (yes, small compared to those who don't).

The iMac was never meant to be a user-upgradable machine anyway. Want to be able to plugin your own gear, buy a Mac Pro. That's what it is for.
 
I'm not annoyed by this news. It's an iMac. Not meant to be opened up.

What I am annoyed about is that Apple designed the iMac to allow memory access but not HD access. They should work the interior so the drives can be removed from the exterior. Then a person can remove the optical and put in another hard drive. If you need to install some disk software or watch a DVD: slip back in the optical.

That computer needs two full sized drives and an optical(all customer removable), in my opinion. If they did that it would be an instant buy.
 
In my opinion a $2000 computer is NOT a low-end computer for people that don't wanna mess with the hardware. When I pay 2 ****ing grand on a computer I'd like to be able to change the harddisks. HDs and RAM are supposed to be user-changeable, no matter which computer it is, and they mostly are. Now I have to consider going for the SSD-version and buy my own 2TB drive. Is it easy to change the 3,5" drive?

Who wants to bet they use the 3,5" bay for the SSD-disk when you only order it with an SSD?


I was thinking the same thing. I hope that someone figures it out and gets it posted. I have been holding off for a while for this update. My wife wants her MB back, since I use it so much...
 
They are not pulling off anything.

I wish all those conspiracy theorists out there would just go and jump off a freakin cliff. Industrial design is all about compromises. Even a 1 mm extra might pose a significant hurdle to a certain design. Being able to "add your own" was simply not worth it for the small number of users that want to use their own SSD (yes, small compared to those who don't).

The iMac was never meant to be a user-upgradable machine anyway. Want to be able to plugin your own gear, buy a Mac Pro. That's what it is for.

Forget the cliff, this is just a poor argument. Industrial design has nothing to do with ignoring possibilities and serving the customers' needs. In fact, industrial design is about having the design part serving the function. Otherwise it would be called 'art', where visuals play the main part, not the primary function.
 
bloody hell just build your own PC.

BUILD BUILD BUILD. and you can also build in such a way that you can install snow lepard.
 
I usually try and ignore the trolls on this site, but the level of idiocy in this thread is just too much. Here's how it is:

You can order an SSD second drive with your iMac from Apple. It's fitted and fully warrantied.

If you don't order an SSD, the space is there, but the cradle isn't. You *will* soon be able to buy these cradles from one of the many companies that sell third party Mac upgrades. Apple don't have any problem with this, but you're on your own. You need to know what you're doing.

The reason Apple didn't include the cradle is blindingly obvious -- these machines are NOT user serviceable. An empty cradle would simply tempt regular users to 'crack it open' and 'have a go'. In fact, having an empty cradle would almost endorse it. These machines are the same breed of tech that laptops use, but with the added bonus of a built in transformer, a magnetically attached glass panel and a 27" LED-lit panel in front of everything. Anyone who has ever had to service laptops will tell you that the chances of causing damage are significantly higher than for desktops, and a significant number of people would, without doubt, destroy their iMacs attempting to fit SSDs. That is not the Apple way, and bashing them for doing the obvious thing is just stupid.

Now, they could have removed the optical drive and added a bay on the side for a 2.5" HDD. That would have been awesome, but Apple clearly aren't ready to let go of optical media yet.
 
Should that not be '... try to get it right'?

:D

;)

I don't have my copy of White and Strunk on me right now, but I'm pretty sure it's just fine to use and/to interchangeably, especially when using it with a (condescending) imperative.*

Either way, I'm correcting grammar and getting annoyed about Stuff That Doesn't Matter, and that is a sure sign I need a break :)

* I actually know nothing about grammar. I just made that up. But I do have a copy of White and Strunk's useful little book.
 
Nothing really surprising here. There's no point in spending the extra to put a bracket into every machine when only 0.1% of people at most are savvy enough to haul it apart themselves and install their own drive.

Apple (unfortunately) realise that 99.9% of people who buy their products are just your everyday Joe and aren't bothered about losing a small percentage of power users to the PC. I get the impression that they don't particularly like power users anyway as they tend to poke around with things they don't want people to know about and are usually the loudest complainers - basically the most expensive customers. As long as the mass market is happy with what they're churning out, the profits roll in. Sensible business.

Yes it's disappointing that they don't offer a sensibly priced SSD and don't offer it as the primary drive in the smaller models (something like an 80GB Intel G2 would be nice) but there you go. You take it or leave it.

I installed the G2 into my old 20" iMac and it'll keep me happy enough for a while. At 3 years old it's given it a new lease of life.

If I was in the market for a new machine though (I'm not), I'm not sure what I'd do. I'm one of these power users they don't care about. With the continued lack of USB3, Blu-Ray and Reasonably Priced SSDs, I think I'd be hopping off the Apple platform or at least building a Hackintosh as there's nothing below the hideously expensive Mac Pro that is capable of those things at this time. Hopefully by the time my iMac dies Apple will have finally strolled into the 21st century :D
 
the joke's wearing thin

The 'let's dismantle the latest Apple device as soon as it hits the shops (or even before)' gag is beginning to look a little tired.
 
It's not a joke, it's the mind of an engineer. New gadget - step 1 unbox, step 2 take it apart and see how it works. Actually using it is the second to last step (before reading - or more likely throwing out - the manual). It's also quite helpful to the repair and aftermarket industry.
 
Want to open and up and play? Get a Mac Pro.

The only decision I can't make is whether I want to pay an extra 600 for SSD hmmm
 
Glad you used that example. It goes hand in hand with that other have been saying about why they would put it in there. It's part of standardized manufacturing. I don't think the average user understand how many unused plugs and brackets are in vehicles (or other consumer products with a varying number of options) to fit a number of consumer options. It's cheaper for manufacturer to purchase one wiring harness to cover all options then to carry multiple varieties to cover different options.

You add in the cost of and difficulty of training assembly persons on varying manufacturing processes and you run into problems. Standardized manufacturing processes and QA control go hand in hand. That's why it's cheaper in the long run to installed extra unneeded parts then to put faith in assembly workers to follow all the processes in multiple options manufacturing process.

This in theory could be true, in reality this does not apply. The first thing that will get removed in cost cutting is unnecessary components. Not to mention the wasting production time assembling components that aren't being used.
 
That's how I was with Electrical tape when I first started playing with car audio!

I quickly learnt that the temporary fix usually turns into a really poor permanent problem!
 
Umm... if Apple can find space in the NEW iMacs to ship with a 2nd drive in there, I think that space should still exist even if the new 27" iMac comes with only 1 drive.

since it's BTO and takes time, the $600 includes the Foxconn people installing the drive for you. which with their new higher salaries costs money
 
Why no matte screen? From this disassembly, can you figure why it is so hard for Apple just to provide a matte, anti-glare option? They've done it before on previous generations of iMacs. Why is someone at Apple so pig-headed about this? See the growing 1,000+ petition at http://macmatte.wordpress.com where numerous people -- such as graphic artists, photographers, people who use their iMacs in sunlit areas, and people prone to eyestrain -- are asking Apple for a matte option. This reeks of Steve Jobs's obstinacy of sticking to his guns when he thinks he is right.

Notice in the antenna-gate issue where Jobs's first response is to say everything is fine, and only recants when pressure is brought to bear. This is Apple's corporate and design attitude - they're right, unless pressure is brought to bear.

People who want matte screens - and it's not everyone, but a substantial minority - should add to the growing petition at http://macmatte.wordpress.com

PPPPPPPPPPUUUUUUUUUUUULLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEZEEEEEEEEEE!
They DON'T have a freakin Matte screen, never-ever will, go by an HP on a stick!
 
BTW people have been mounting drives with duct tape and tie-wraps for years, it's reasonable enough. It was also necessary with the old Amiga 600s and 1200s in 1993, which also didn't come with a bracket if you didn't buy the HD version :D
 
We (the genius bar team) would cringe because these are a pain to fix. Taking out the glass and replacing it without getting lint, dust or anything is almost impossible. But trying to mod it? *faints*

I agree that this is not for the casual user, but there is a small percentage of us who don't mind risking a warranty and getting frustrated, in order to mod an iMac.

I added a new hard drive to my iMac and did not find it that difficult at all. One advantage that I have over the genius bar, is that my child uses cloth diapers, which are lint-free. They helped to make handling the glass a clean and easy process.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.