Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Their little experiment doesn't qualify as anything but an experiment...

I could post the same thing and state the opposite. What else do you believe from the internet?

We really need a look at clock cycles...

All in all, if Apple intended to speed up the slow animations, then they failed.

That's a fail apple...The difference should be undeniable, night and day.

For so many to struggle to believe its faster means something is wrong.
Well, Apple didn't really attempt to speed up animations per se, Apple simply made the control of the movement in the animations part of what the "reduce movement" accessibility option controls, so that with it enabled the movement in the animations is reduced, which, is in fact the actual case. The whole speed aspect of it all is more of a related but an extraneous item that people often bundle with the movement of animations, so that's why that topic surfaced here.

But, again, Apple didn't set out to do anything about speeds of animations specifically, just the ability to reduce their movement (which in turn decreases their duration, and seemingly increases the speed of some interactions at least by a bit).
 
The primary change was of course for the feel/view of it, and not the speed or anything like that, to actually reduce the motion itself, which is what's there. But, some things did improve, at the very least it's clear that opening a folder and going to a different page in that folder is different and faster with reduce motion off now. For the rest of it, even it might be a perception thing, as long as people like it, then it's certainly an improvement for them, even if in just perception (after all, the animations are all just perception eye-candy as they don't do anything functional/practical, so for those that don't care about them or are even affected by them in some way, it's definitely an improvement just on that level).

Exactly, and I find it odd that Jony dumped the skeumorph and pushes functional/practical but then adds the whiz bang zooms and the moving wallpapers etc. Funny how a button provides no "function" so use Text instead then add this. But yes nice to have the option faster or not.

And seriously we are talking milliseconds. I just try to know that I want to check email a half second sooner so I press the button and by the time it opens its when I really wanted to view it :)
 
HA HA HA

All I can say is **** all you all who thought it wasn't faster.

Its faster. 100% confirmed and delivered. Its even faster then I thought.

Oh yea, cuz some website said so? Surely you jest?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HA HA HA

All I can say is **** all you all who thought it wasn't faster.

Its faster. 100% confirmed and delivered. Its even faster then I thought.

All it 'confirms' from that one site is that you were wrong since closing an app is the same time thus no regular animation does not make it 'faster'.

IF there is a difference in the unlocking to home screen like they say in the test, the difference is the parallax effect for 2 wallpapers (lock and home), not the zooming in animation.

Also, why don't you lend them your equipment or your iPhone, since it seems your 'quantifications' are way different than them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well...

Oh yea, cuz some website said so? Surely you jest?

How many experiments do you do yourself? If not I guess you must not believe much in this world. I'm not saying that the website link that I posted is perfectly accurate but it's pretty clear that there is some time saved by reducing of the animations so time is gained by being able to get to your apps more quickly, etc. SOME time is saved. I could notice it without any 120 fps cameras but the fact that somebody took the time to do so bolsters the argument.
 
How many experiments do you do yourself? If not I guess you must not believe much in this world. I'm not saying that the website link that I posted is perfectly accurate but it's pretty clear that there is some time saved by reducing of the animations so time is gained by being able to get to your apps more quickly, etc. SOME time is saved. I could notice it without any 120 fps cameras but the fact that somebody took the time to do so bolsters the argument.

I'm making a video right now with 120fps slo motion comparisons of reduced motion. Much faster for unlocking, but very similar across the board elsewhere. Will post in this thread when done.
 
How many experiments do you do yourself? If not I guess you must not believe much in this world. I'm not saying that the website link that I posted is perfectly accurate but it's pretty clear that there is some time saved by reducing of the animations so time is gained by being able to get to your apps more quickly, etc. SOME time is saved. I could notice it without any 120 fps cameras but the fact that somebody took the time to do so bolsters the argument.

I compared between two phones and saw for myself...First hand experience. Nothing but clock cycles or Apple will convince me otherwise.

The fact that people are trying to use slowmo to catch a sub second (less than human response time) difference is truly reaching and pretty suspect.
 
I was one of the people that suffered from the dizziness in IOS7 which prevented me from upgrading, so glad they listened to those effected and allowed them to be changed into the fades. Loving IOS7 now!
 
I compared between two phones and saw for myself...First hand experience. Nothing but clock cycles or Apple will convince me otherwise.

The fact that people are trying to use slowmo to catch a sub second (less than human response time) difference is truly reaching and pretty suspect.
I think it would be fair to say that it would make more sense to go by actual measurable numbers from an actual well-known source in the mobile world like GSM Arena vs. anecdotal opinions of random people. Somehow that seems like a better idea.
 
I think it would be fair to say that it would make more sense to go by actual measurable numbers from an actual well-known source in the mobile world like GSM Arena vs. anecdotal opinions of random people. Somehow that seems like a better idea.

Not when my own eyes see otherwise...
 
I compared between two phones and saw for myself...First hand experience. Nothing but clock cycles or Apple will convince me otherwise.

The fact that people are trying to use slowmo to catch a sub second (less than human response time) difference is truly reaching and pretty suspect.

Did you use it for more then a few minutes? Try it for a day then go back.

One of the main things for me is switching between multiple apps. Especially if the second app is in a folder. Going home, opening the folder, and then opening the app are all much faster as the reductions from the 3 animations really add up.

Also, I'm not seeing the interaction delay people are mentioning. if the app is already open, going back in results in instant interaction. Maybe my phone is special.
 
Well I updated my 5 today to iOS 7. Stayed with 6 solely for the animations issue with 7.

Feeling good about it so far
 
New Animations are SO MUCH BETTER [in 7.0.3]

HA HA HA

All I can say is **** all you all who thought it wasn't faster.

Its faster. 100% confirmed and delivered. Its even faster then I thought.

In all fairness the article says one aspect is faster.

That particular example and discussion about fakeclockup is not related to human response time.

----------
What do you know, actual quantitative information that shows there are some speed improvements.

After reading that link I will concede that unlocking is faster with reduce motion on. I still do not believe it makes a perceptible difference in other actions (other than the folder swiping previously discussed). Their data with closing an app seems to back that up. I would like to see more comprehensive testing (such as how quickly you can open an app after closing an app etc.)

That being said, while apps (in my experience and excluding after immediately unlocking) can be opened at the same speed if you know the location of the app on the screen it is easier to locate them to press them with the fade animation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
While we are at it, should we discuss the various differences between a7 and a6 processors of the same type? Mine might clock at 1.3Ghz, but yours might clock At 1.295Ghz...Care to argue that one people?
 
While we are at it, should we discuss the various differences between a7 and a6 processors of the same type? Mine might clock at 1.3Ghz, but yours might clock At 1.295Ghz...Care to argue that one people?

Don't be a sore loser man
 
At least they did something.....

There is no difference in speed of the fade transitions versus the motion transitions. The difference is the ability to interact with icons slightly faster, which is giving a perceived faster user experience. I like the lack of animation and find it more useful for my purposes. Older devices like iPad 3 and below, as well as the iPhone 4 and below, can now have a smoother user experience with iOS 7 thanks to the removal of the laggy animations. However, it is a shame that Apple took a drastic measure in changing a key element of iOS 7 in order to make it more usable for older devices.
 
There is no difference in speed of the fade transitions versus the motion transitions. The difference is the ability to interact with icons slightly faster, which is giving a perceived faster user experience. I like the lack of animation and find it more useful for my purposes. Older devices like iPad 3 and below, as well as the iPhone 4 and below, can now have a smoother user experience with iOS 7 thanks to the removal of the laggy animations. However, it is a shame that Apple took a drastic measure in changing a key element of iOS 7 in order to make it more usable for older devices.

There is a speed difference. Check out some of the links on the last 2 pages here.
 
I actually prefer the new fade in/out transitions when you have the 'Reduce Motion' option switched on, rather than having folders zoom in and out all the time.

Think I will leave it like this for a while.....!:)
 
7.0.3 Correct all the issues with my 5S including this one. The animations are working great (I do like them), the level works perfectly, scrolling in the photo app is perfect, and the icons no longer reset when going back to the home screen after closing an app.

This baby is smooth as silk since the upgrade!!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.