Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
First Apple needs to make Photos bombproof, which it is not. Only after Photos never loses pix or metadata should engineers spend time on cutesy tricks like auto-cleaning backgrounds.
 
Here you go. Not long ago, I had our kid take some snapshots (had a few just about alike) for our wedding anniversary. She doesn't tend to factor in background content that can throw off a photo, so I ended up...wearing a ceiling fan beanie.

View attachment 2504036
I pulled up Photos on my M4Pro Mac Mini (not iPhone), and in short order had this:
View attachment 2504037

Particularly with 'amateur' shots (which is all we take), it's common to find things in the background that detract from the image, and discover this later. A tuft of hair out of place, an inconvenient stranger wearing loudly colored clothing in the background in a public place, etc...
Thanks. That’s a good example, indeed.

However, I think that the character of the photo is lost without the fan. Like yeah, it happened to be taken like this, but it’s fun. It’s not a passport photo, wasn’t meant to be one in the first place.

Same with this photo I took earlier this year. Wanted to take a selfie with the slides behind. Was looking for the best way to frame the photo, realising only later than the slides look like a hair accessory. However, once you see it this way, I think it’s fun and the photo kinda gets a new, fun, meaning.

IMG_4741.jpeg


If you want something specific, like passport photo, specific background, no objects, you would aim to take the photo in a matching setting in the first place.
 
This feature sucks unless the object is very plainly by itself in the image. I tried with some other images and it made an absolute mess of them.
 
I will never understand why people would want to use such feature in the first place.
Kids(and not only..) spend hours editing photos before posting on social media.

Samsung (and google) allows to do what was complex editing like:
- Open everyone eyes
- Put the people in the group more near by
- remove that person behind

in 30 seconds.

this is heavily use! And apple missing out on good photo editing features is hurting the brand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crisneat and brgjoe
Way more interesting feature would be some automated AI help to remove redundant images which differ only slightly, suggedting to keep one or two single images having the best quality.
Why? Check the photo library of your teen daughter and you’ll know why. At least 90% can be removed, even my daughter admits that. But doing that manually is something terribly boring for her.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Arran
Our kiddo took a few photos; the one with the fan probably isn't the exact one; I didn't scrutinize real closely. All I had it edit out was the fan. Now if it were my wife doing the editing, she'd have tried to edit out clutter so you couldn't see what our house looks like most of the time... 😁
Fifty years from now we’re all sitting in the retirement home wondering, “didn’t houses have ceiling fans back in 2025?”
 
…Also, is it Apple’s mission to use people who don’t definitely look like a guy nor girl in their ads? What are they pushing here? (Legit question)…
Legit answer: Most people don’t look like tinsel-town models and movie stars?
 
It is soooooo bad, like 5 years ago tech. Campetitors are yeaaaaaaats ahead exactly on this. Try it on Samsung,Huawei, etc. Apple is just pathetic at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: miq and RickDEGH
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.