I meant more of internet bandwidth and storage for Apple and streamers like Nerflix. Not a lot of peopleAt what point? HDMI 2.1 supports TrueHD audio, 4K/120Hz video (more actually), along with lanes for speaker-positioning (ATMOS) and dynamic HDR (Dolby Vision). The HDMI 2.1a spec is slightly better with the same bandwidth, but I’m not sure of hardware support for that. That’s not talking about the HDMI 2.2 spec that has only just been finalized and won’t see consumer hardware for years (outside of somewhat questionable cables).
With my LG C4 and Sonos ARC system I can use the full range of TrueHD ATMOS and 4K/120Hz Dolby Vision but currently only via BluRay or a PC.
If you mean internet bandwidth, I’d largely agree but there is a push for better fibre in North America (and honestly we lag behind quite a few places in Europe and Asia). That also doesn’t account for a) people who are streaming their own media within a LAN, and b) that either the better audio or video would both be beneficial on their own never mind together. Think F1 or sports streaming for example - 4K/120 with Dolby Vision would be AMAZINGLY immersive with buttery-smooth replays but you don’t need any better audio than we already have. On the flip side, a true lossless multitrack audio master of an orchestra would be jaw-dropping, but doesn’t need any video data at all.
Edit to add: but again, hypothetically this is all for an AppleTV Pro with the premium price point. This isn’t the device that grandma will be picking up for Christmas, or come as a “gift with two-year subscription” from your ISP.
really want Dolby True HD. Heck, I wouldn’t be surprised if streamers choose the 2:35 aspect ratio for their shows to save 30% on bandwith under the premise that it’s more « cinematic ». It’s just my opinion, but I think that, at the time of huge 4k tvs, 1:90 should be the new « cinematic » standard. But that’s just my opinion and it’s correct if I’m the only person on Earth to think that!