transpo1
macrumors 68000
It was, but I toggled it in the hopes that it would reset and work again 🙂 Thanks!Double check it's enabled in Watch app > Passcode > Unlock with iPhone
It was, but I toggled it in the hopes that it would reset and work again 🙂 Thanks!Double check it's enabled in Watch app > Passcode > Unlock with iPhone
Yes - Face ID works fine most of the time.Face ID is so transparent to me I don't even think about it when I pick up my iPhone or iPad.
The "unlock with Apple Watch" feature on macOS can be a bit hit and miss though. Otherwise works fine.
Happy to fill in the blanks.Curious which Garmin your partner got? What is you partner’s usage pattern (things like how many notifications a day, if any, how many and how long are long are the GPS workouts a day? Does you partner always carry a phone when using the watch?)?
Of course not, I don’t upgrade yearly. Heck, I held off for 5 years last time and could have held off longer.Just because it is updated yearly doesn’t mean you need to buy one.
And Ultra hasn’t been updated in 2 years …
Of course not, I don’t upgrade yearly. Heck, I held off for 5 years last time and could have held off longer.
The problem is that it is functionally not upgraded yearly, just rebranded. The Apple Watch is on a 2, sometimes 3, year upgrade cycle. You would push more consumers to upgrade on a 24 month upgrade cycle, possibly increasing sales.
Correct, and I am lobbying for them to skip yearly upgrades given the fact that they just rebrand the same device. The Apple Watch S11 for instance, is the same as the S10.You’re taking about the S.E.?
That’s not true as a general statement. They do upgrade it yearly for the most part. And even the S.E. doesn’t get a yearly re-brand.
The S.E. no, and the Ultra they missed a year, but in general the watch has yearly upgrades.
Correct, and I am lobbying for them to skip yearly upgrades given the fact that they just rebrand the same device. The Apple Watch S11 for instance, is the same as the S10.
Yes, it’s the same device with a water temperature detector as that comparison shows. If we’re going by the rumors, the S11 appears to be the same as the S10, which is why Apple now talks about “generations” with Apple Watched as being 3 years. Best to just skip three watches per generation and keep it to one or two.The series 11 isn't out yet.
Are you saying that the S10 and S9 are the same? That is incorrect. Apple has a comparison feature here:
![]()
Apple Watch Compare
Compare specs for the latest Apple Watch models: Apple Watch Ultra 3, Apple Watch Series 11, and Apple Watch SE 3.www.apple.com
Yes, it’s the same device with a water temperature detector as that comparison shows. If we’re going by the rumors, the S11 appears to be the same as the S10, which is why Apple now talks about “generations” with Apple Watched as being 3 years. Best to just skip three watches per generation and keep it to one or two.
I suppose offering a new color is different, but it’s still just rebranding the same device with no performance improvement, redesign, battery improvement, etc.Well they're all the same then if you don't consider the differences. All laptops are the same. All cars are the same. All phones are the same. All iPads are the same.
I do agree that every 3 generations is typically a larger leap. I don't buy ever year, nobody is forcing you too either and I hope you're leveraging that self control.
That doesn't make them the same device though.
Just because it is updated yearly doesn’t mean you need to buy one.
And Ultra hasn’t been updated in 2 years …
That is wildly incorrect. The most recent devices (Watch 11 and Ultra 3) introduced a brand new cellular chip that introduced 5G & offered new cellular bands that weren't available in prior year. As others have pointed out, there are many changes year over year (I think the Series 10's introduced a thinner watch IIRC among other things). You're right that they mostly look the same, but aside from that there are improvements year over year. There is no 'rebranding of the same device' going on. Just because they look the same (or similar) on the outside doesn't mean they haven't made changes internally.I suppose offering a new color is different, but it’s still just rebranding the same device with no performance improvement, redesign, battery improvement, etc.
That is wildly incorrect. The most recent devices (Watch 11 and Ultra 3) introduced a brand new cellular chip that introduced 5G & offered new cellular bands that weren't available in prior year. As others have pointed out, there are many changes year over year (I think the Series 10's introduced a thinner watch IIRC among other things). You're right that they mostly look the same, but aside from that there are improvements year over year. There is no 'rebranding of the same device' going on. Just because they look the same (or similar) on the outside honest mean they haven't made changes internally.
Except it isn't on a side button my M1 MBP! It is the top right keyboard key.It'll be in the side button, I'll bet. Apple would be extending the paradigm they've already established and users would understand how to operate it (the old learn once, use anywhere Mac approach).
The display method would be more suitable for an eventual camera-equipped model, if Apple go down that route, as it could potentially allow for Face ID (miniaturisation permitting, of course).
Except it isn't on a side button my M1 MBP! It is the top right keyboard key.
Which suddenly brought up a question in my mind.Good point, I hadn't considered that; but I think the logic still works as the Mac uses that style of Touch ID and non-Mac computers like iPad, iPhone use the side button type of Touch ID.