Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So? Many others can't. Just the other day I called up a friend to see if he had received a work related email. He had to hang up and check. I can do both, he can't. There is a difference. Now, as per the ad, well poorly executed on AT&T's part.

Although, the general idea is nice, the ad itself sucks.

Email is push to your phone, my email comes to me while I'm on the phone frequently.
 
You misunderstood me. I never said that it's not useful. I would be dishonest if I said that it's not useful. I'm just saying that there's no NEED. It's simply my opinion and I know people disagree with me. It's not a narrow mindset. There is truly no need for it. It's a luxury.

It's a feature NOT a luxury. A convenient feature at that.
 
You misunderstood me. I never said that it's not useful. I would be dishonest if I said that it's not useful. I'm just saying that there's no NEED. It's simply my opinion and I know people disagree with me. It's not a narrow mindset. There is truly no need for it. It's a luxury.

No, you're right... it IS a luxury. Admittedly, it's a nice luxury to have :D

My bad for misunderstanding (just got back from happy hour, so I blame the beer.................and yes, I had a DD!).
 
Features are luxuries. I am making a clear distinction between need and luxury, like a cellphone is a luxury.

Luxuries are extras you have to pay for. That's what makes it a luxury. Cell phones are just a tool for me (NOT a luxury at all).
 
Luxuries are extras you have to pay for. That's what makes it a luxury. Cell phones are just a tool for me (NOT a luxury at all).

So, your service is free? Awesome!

But just because a cell phone/service is not a $50,000 luxury, doesn't mean it's not a luxury. It's nothing more than a convenience... ask those who lived happily fine before cell phones (and the Interweb) became prevalent.
 
So, your service is free? Just because a cell phone/service is not a $50,000 luxury, doesn't mean it's not a luxury. It's nothing more than a convenience... ask those who lived happily fine before cell phones (and the Interwebs) became prevalent.

It may be a luxury to you to me it is NOT.
 
Meh, once AT&T can match Vz on reliable voice coverage, then we can talk about the advantage of GSM. Otherwise it is a mute point. No signal = no data and no voice.
 
That is a pretty weak response. He could NOT wait for the phone call to end. There's absolutely no need to have voice and data at the same time.

Here we go with the "absolutely no need for voice and data at the same time":rolleyes:
To you maybe not, for others its very important. Just because you lived and put up with it doesnt mean others want to or will.
 
Meh, once AT&T can match Vz on reliable voice coverage, then we can talk about the advantage of GSM. Otherwise it is a mute point. No signal = no data and no voice.

You do know att has great coverage? And there are spots where both dont get coverage? We are not talking about sprint or t-mobile here....
 
So its nice to have voice and data at the same time, once a year, if you're stupid enough not to remember your own anniversary?

...and too stupid to have it programmed into his calendar and ToDo list. If he forgot his anniversary, he also forgot that early morning meeting where he's to do the presentation to the CEO.
 
AT&T needs to make a video with this same concept but in a much more relatable situation. This commercial is a good concept but bad execution. I mean, come on... forgetting your anniversary? It's not like some obscure day that is easily forgettable. This major problem with this video is that it really only targets married men who own iPhones.

You've completely missed the point of this commercial if you believe what you just wrote. There are a million situations they could have portrayed, they just chose that one. The commercial is supposed to make everyone imagine their own little situation and why they would need that ability.
 
I don't talk and surf at the same time much, but it has really come in handy in a few situations.

One night my wife called me in a panic because she had gotten lost driving somewhere in her car. I put her on speaker, opened up Google maps and figured out where she was, and guided her turn-by-turn to where she needed to be.

That was a life-saver, as she was very upset. I haven't needed it like that often, but it does come in handy sometimes.
 
A better commerical would have been if he was tethering and a call came in. I think that's where voice + data comes into play. The hotspot feature isn't that beneficial on verizon.
 
That is a pretty weak response. He could NOT wait for the phone call to end. There's absolutely no need to have voice and data at the same time. Verizon smartphone customers have been doing for how long now and we survive easily without it. What are the chances of this happening in real life? Extremely slim to none.

Sorry AT&T... Verizon's massive coverage (important for me since I travel a lot and AT&T 3G coverage is very spotty in my area) > voice + data. You should focus on the 3G speed over Verizon using data gathered by tech sites. That would be far better than trying to convince people that the need for voice + data outweighs 3G coverage.

People have "survived" without cellphones for a long time, doesn't they aren't useful. Why is it so hard to admit that it's a feature that Verizon doesn't have. It's like when the iPhone didn't have MMS and people said 'you can just email the photo'. What's wrong with At&t advertising a feature that they have over Verizon?

I could think of a hundred uses for voice and data at the same time, but obviously I don't have to have it just like I don't have to have a car to get to work.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.