Someone should tell Samsung.
Do you even know what Samsung does as a company? The mobile divsion is small part of Samsung in the scheme of things. actually Samsung made more money than Apple last year.
Someone should tell Samsung.
Arrogance. It's that simple.
It killed Nokia, and it killed BlackBerry. It nearly killed Microsoft (Before they managed to recover under S. Nadella).
And it'll be what kills Google as well.
Nah, most of Blackberry's death should be blamed on terrible management that had everything going right for them but wouldn't evolve to meet their competitors until it was way too late. Now about six years too late Blackberry has one of the best mobile OS ever... and like >5% of the marketshare.
Do you even know what Samsung does as a company? The mobile divsion is small part of Samsung in the scheme of things. actually Samsung made more money than Apple last year.
Moral: Must keep innovating or you will not survive.
Well, I wanted to read the excerpt, but WSJ is telling me I have to subscribe.![]()
Apple didn't kill IBM. It was their decision to use off the shelf parts, which made it ridiculously easy for other companies to produce machines compatible with MS-DOS.
We'll see. The media is exceedingly fickle and disloyal. And IT follows, it does not lead...because it serves - if Google starts to topple, IT's not in a position to be the thing to save it...just like IT couldn't save RIM/BB.
If you copy the link and type it into Google.com search box (not your browser's box) and click on the link that shows up, you should be able to read the entire article without subscribing.
I've yet to see a Blackberry in the wild in 2015.
Actually, I saw 1 but I had to contain myself from laughing.
It'll be interesting to see what happens with Search, though.
Google won't lose its position as king of search because people migrate to Bing.com on their browser. It will l lose its position if people start using Spotlight on Apple products and Corrana straight from the Windows desktop
I still say the biggest mistake RIM made, was trying to compete with the iPhone in the consumer market, instead of keeping their core enterprise customers happy.
For instance, we had just spent years converting corporate apps to the Blackberry platform, when RIM announced that they were going to no longer support their old OS. From management's viewpoint, that was an immediate kiss of death. (I think they later said otherwise, but by then it was too late.)
Microsoft had already made the same mistake dropping Windows Mobile, which was also popular with enterprises.
Never bite the hand that feeds you. At least, not until you have other hands![]()
Today's news that Apple was focused on compatibility with legacy iPhones reminds me ol RIM and MS.
Companies have to be ok to let go of the day's core product and be mindful of upcoming changes and competition. Old iPhones are the past and belong there perfectly. Focus on where the puck will be, not where it was 5 yrs ago.
and then their market would still shrink by losing general everyday customers and they'd be limited to govt. contracts.
RIMS mistake was not adapting to market. They needed to realize they could not complete on the OS front since they weren't a software company. Thus they should have adapted Android and became the biggest Android manufacture instead.
Even Obama has moved on.
Do you even know what Samsung does as a company? The mobile divsion is small part of Samsung in the scheme of things. actually Samsung made more money than Apple last year.
Yes, looks were important but the iPhone allowed you to send email with any service desired by the customer. With RIM you were locked into their email and servers. They lost a lot of customers just over that.
Also RIMs third party developer program was so exclusive, it was like applying to a country club or private society club. The rush of apps going on the iPhone also overwhelmed RIM.
Even Obama has moved on.