That isn't it, because I can change the scores up or down (by TWO points) at will.
Yeah, I see what you're saying. I was able to change the vote on your post back and forth from 1 to -1 with one click.
On a side note, before I start a new thread about it, is anyone having issues with the ability to view PMs? I'm getting a "fatal error".
I voted Skunk's post as well so that accounts for one vote.
Ha!
So someone voted my post -1 and I managed to bump it back to 0
Of course I am quite sure it'll be back to -10 soon.![]()
Use the Report Post feature to alert the moderators.arn,
What are we to do with people who will abuse of this new feature?
Do we need to know this? At least disable it for PRSI.The goal of post votes is to identify the comments that others most agree with or appreciate seeing.
That isn't it, because I can change the scores up or down (by TWO points) at will.
In other words, there is no allowance for apathy. I can't be arsed with a system that doesn't allow for apathy. **** that.If the score is X, you can change the score to X-1 and X+1. If you change it to X-1 then press up, it'll display as X+1 which removes your down vote and adds your upvote.
The difference is, clicking the vote button doesn't add a useless post to the thread and doesn't increase the voter's post count (since many have used +1 posts in the past to artificially boost their post counts for avatars, etc.)It is against forum rules to simply reply "+1": what on earth is the difference between that and clicking a button to say "+1"?
arn,
What are we to do with people who will abuse of this new feature?
In other words, there is no allowance for apathy. I can't be arsed with a system that doesn't allow for apathy. **** that.
Apathy would be not clicking anything.
If I want to revert to apathy from a previously engaged stance, I can't. I have to actively disapprove or actively approve.Apathy would be not clicking anything.
If I want to revert to apathy from a previously engaged stance, I can't. I have to actively disapprove or actively approve.
You were asking for that.
But you aren't. You are moving it by 2. And it's inconsistent.Mostly I was explaining that you really aren't moving the post vote by 2.