Lol. Exactly. I’m almost afraid to think what Apple’s definition of reasonably price is.I’m sure they mean reasonably profitable.![]()
Lol. Exactly. I’m almost afraid to think what Apple’s definition of reasonably price is.I’m sure they mean reasonably profitable.![]()
The price of a kidney 😂🤣😂Lol. Exactly. I’m almost afraid to think what Apple’s definition of reasonably price is.
Or two if Tim has any say so. Lol.The price of a kidney 😂🤣😂
Are the cables included or sold separately?"reasonable price" = $699 absolute minimum
Are the cables included or sold separately?
Have you seen this device? Also the AVP is still far above what anyone else has delivered.They have no vision anymore. This is another useless device. How far they have fallen…
No one wants a hub for smart home things. That’s the point of a smartphone always nearby. You want people getting up and going over to a ****ing screen that isn’t even near them? Incredibly stupid idea.
There is no intelligent and inventive design at Apple anymore.
The only things they should be working on right now are:
Mac’s, iPhone, AirPods and AirPods Pro, a new health band which only does health monitoring with no screen and the screen and computation is the iPhone. A pair of smart glasses where the computation is the phone, and better them overtime to include projected displays on the lenses. And finally, a humanoid robot.
That’s all.
the AVP is still far above what anyone else has delivered.
THIS ^^
I would LOVE this device
I've wanted an Apple "Fitness Band" for years and years (view all the data on your iPhone)
I do not understand why they won't take a swing at it
I think you can get away with quite a low resolution and maintain the retina description if the viewing distance is high enough: a resolution of 1366x768 (what "HD" TV panels use to be in the 2000s) on a 7" screen would give >200 ppi which is enough for retina at a viewing distance for a desktop monitor.No, because it won’t support third-party apps. At $10 per display, I’m also wondering at the resolution, might not be retina. I’m furthermore wondering about touch input, it might remain voice-only.
Also, the iPad mini is far from square, that will make the UI experience quite different.
Given how important the Cloud and wireless connectivity is to Apple devices today, I'm amazed Apple has abandoned the router market to it's competitors. As you point out, an Apple router / mesh system with an A18 chip and Apple's forthcoming bluetooth / WiFi chip would enable an Apple device to run the internet conenction, manage the various nodes on the network (which could include HomePods and AppleTVs) to optimise the wifi connection, provide local Apple Intelligence support to devices on the network and act as a HomeKit/Matter hub. I'm sure Apple could find a way to monitise it further by adding Time Machine storage at a horrendous price.To be honest, being an apple user, I wouldn't get it even if it's for $50. I have no use case for it.
Instead, give me a privacy focus secured routers with an integrated home security system + security cameras + integrated door bell + in-home video storage + iCloud subscription. I will spend over $1k for it and keep updating.
I remember way back in 2010 when Steve Jobs introduced iPad. And many people characterized it as "Just a big iPhone. Who asked for that?"
We ended up trusting Steve Jobs and respecting his vision and innovation. Tim Cook, eh ... maybe not so much.
I trusted Steve Jobs when he introduced the first Mac. And Cook when Jobs appointed him CEO. An outstanding move by Jobs.
Trust is earned, not appointed.