Originally posted by SPG
Hey SPG, why do you feel the need to explain yourself? Just post as you see fit and nevermind if someone out there takes you too seriously. Honestly, threatening to report you for posting a reply to your own post? Ooops! Now you did it.
__________________
whatever.
buffsldr,Originally posted by buffsldr
Lol....ftaok, I am not trying to slam you, but the scenario you painted is odd. If this project is so important, why do you need to go home and eat dinner. whats wrong with take out in your office? If you have to go home (an emergency or unbreakable appointment) what good does having the computer with you do? you cant work anyway. If commute time is huge, then you have a point. But its cheaper, more ergonomic to get 2 desktops, 1 for home, 1 for work. I dont know, you might be right, but I just think you have to draw the line somewhere. Present technology just doesnt give the laptop the ability to be all things to all people.
Originally posted by Rower_CPU
FWIW...
You can remove accidental posts by clicking on the edit button beneath your post and then clicking the delete thread tab and button at the edit post screen...
Originally posted by SPG
re: Double posting. SORRY! already! It happened while I was hitting the back button and I didn't even notice it. And fwiw Rover, you were attacking my post to myself and my girlfriend says I'm cute.
___________________
Ooooh! 1 more post.
Originally posted by serpicolugnut
Apple gives iDVD away. The reason Apple developed it was to sell hardware with DVD-RW drives built in. This is hardly anticompetitive. It's a very common business practice.
macrain,Originally posted by mcrain
So, obviously, M$'s giving away IE and optimizing everything to use its software couldn't possibly be anti-competitive?
The fact of the matter is that if Apple had 95% of the market right now, their business practices would be tested in court. I don't know if they would hold up or not, but I guarantee you an attorney (like me who isn't completely computer literate) will see what Apple is doing as sounding enough like anti-competive behaviour to bring suit.
Just like viruses which are designed to go after the OS that is used in the majority of systems, attorneys for private companies and the government see M$ as the deep pockets, and thus the target.
Right now, Apple isn't really on the radar screen, and I would worry that if the stars all line up and Apple becomes the dominant player in the OS/Hardware/Server market, it will be attacked, because it's actions "look" anticompetitive enough for an attorney with minimal skills to draft a complaint that would survive a motion to dismiss.