Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't Apple usually ship wired keyboards and mice with new systems?.Selling bluetooth separately as CTO.
yea they do, thats why the point above yours was a moot one
Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't Apple usually ship wired keyboards and mice with new systems?.Selling bluetooth separately as CTO.
And what kind of engineer do you purport to be, exactly? I'm not sure what your issues are with the icons being used for Expose and Dashboard. The Expose icon is the same as being used in System Preferences and can be seen in many screenshots of Leopard. The Dashboard icon is the same as the one in your dock and/or Applications folder, the meter with a dial.
The Apple logo serves no functional purpose, the cloverleaf actually is used throughout the OS for shortcuts. To continue using the Apple logo would confuse new users into thinking this key opened the Apple menu, much as the Windows key opens the start menu. Less confusion, and every icon has a purpose now.
The eject key caused problem for many when it was on the edge and was often hit in mistake. Perhaps they did some user studies and research and found it was better placed further in on the keyboard and coincedentally in the identical spot as on MacBooks.
Function keys on the right are programmable, and most likely for spreadsheet applications in conjunction with the numeric pad. The Function key that replaces Help is a modifier for the appropriate Expose and Dashboard F-keys.
An engineer analyzes, finds connections, and believe it or not needs to think a bit. You can't attack it, probably out of fear of change, and claim fake before even beginning to wonder why these changes could make sense and lead to better usability.
This could easily be an old prototype or some kind of cheap Asian knock-off. Witness the fairly convincing clones of the iPod nano and the iPhone that we've seen pictures of in recent months.
What raises a question for me is one of the labels on the bottom of the keyboard. It clearly mentions "rubber feet" in "Moon Gray". But if you look at the the bottom of the keyboard pictured, those divots seem concave without any feet. Even if my perception of the feet is wrong, they certainly aren't moon gray.
F4 is power.
Interesting story I found at Engadget. Take a look...
http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/27/is-this-the-new-imac-keyboard/
And there is an fn key. It has taken the place of the "Help" key above the forward "Delete" key.
I was smart enough not to open this in Word. Not that there's anything in the document to begin with. Bean didn't turn anything up. Nice first post though.This is the new monitor
I was smart enough not to open this in Word. Not that there's anything in the document to begin with.
What is in it?
This keyboard is definitely easier to clean than the current one.
Also notice how they removed the useless §± key just under the esc key and replaced it with the `~ key that used to be at the left of the Z key.
Thats why they also made the left shift key wider..
I'm not sure we will need 19 F keys (F19). Also look at the 0 key in the numeric pad... I think it looks very bad...
This is the new monitor
I believe the §± is something from the UK keyboards. There are many slight differences here or there between different localizations and languages of keyboards.What §± key? Tilde has always been in the upper left, hasn't it?
This is the new monitor
Heh nice one.hax.
AbiWord turned up something for me. Looks like every other metal Cinema Display/iMac mockup.That mockup is exactly what I am talking about. Bad design.
By the way... why did you put the images in Word? Why not.... anything else?
Someone tell me this isn't a virus and then I'll look at it.
why not just post the picture? Why is it embedded in a .doc?
I was smart enough not to open this in Word. Not that there's anything in the document to begin with. Bean didn't turn anything up. Nice first post though.
What is in it?
This is what I use on my PC at home (which will be sold and replaced by the new iMac):
![]()
It is very thin, with small laptop style keys. It is very nice to type on, so I don't understand the 'it's fake because it looks ergonomically horrible to type on' posts.
Someone tell me this isn't a virus and then I'll look at it.
why not just post the picture? Why is it embedded in a .doc?
Looks like they've moved the eject key, I would prefer to have it back in its current place as you can easily access it without looking at the keyboard.
Actually its quite ergonomic. The key to many of the repetitive strain injuries (Carpal Tunnel) involves improper wrist position (flexed or extended). If the keyboard is somewhat thinner then your wrist will be in a more neutral position. Hopefully it won't take much getting used to though.![]()
This is the mocked up keyboard of a designer, since there was nothing wrong with the layout of the keys on the current keyboards, so they changed them for no reason, which is a big mistake in engineering. They don't change the way bridges are made and designed unless they have to.
The keys don't have enough travel. The keys don't move up and down nearly at all, so they can't give you much feedback, and your fingers hit the end of the key press like a wall. I know it's probably asking too much for Apple to move back to mechanical switches, but this is a step in the wrong direction.
The function keys are too small. A common Apple mistake on recent keyboards. Function keys are far away from the hands' normal position; to hit them with speed and accuracy they should be big targets, ideally separated from the number keys by a space.
There are other problems with the keyboard: it's not ergonomic (the forward tilt is actually worse for ergonomics than a flat keyboard), there are spaces between the keys (try pressing command and option at the same time on a Macbook... it's not easy).
Change can be good, change can be bad. But progress in inevitable.
Don't bother. It's just that icky mockup of an ACD monitor with a DVD slot in the side trying to pass as a new iMac.