I'm here again to give you some more facts.
Penryn processors using the 266 MHz multiplier
1066 MHz Front Side Bus
DDR2-667, DDR2-800, DDR3-800 and DDR3-1066 SO-DIMM RAM support
DisplayPort
GMA X4500/HD
who cares.. where is my 12" macbook pro ehem..
No. We have had minor speed bumps/capacity upgrades in the past. At least this one adds new tech to the CPU.There's no question the refresh is upon us (within the next week). My question is: in looking back across all iMac upgrades from the most minimal to complete overhauls... will this small jump to Penryn + HDD increase officialy be the most insignificant upgrade ever? To my knowledge (which is limited) it is.
Thoughts? Thank you ahead
this is EXACTLY the posiiton I'm in at the moment. To the point of thinking about getting the iMAC and if it doesn't work out, just giving it to the wife / kids. As a person wanting to switch from PC to Apple, I'd never even considered the Mini. But then I thought what will I do with my current display if I get an iMac? Anway, I guess all will be revealed soon enough or June.I mostly agree, but I don't wouldn't call Apple's simplified product line pointless. On some level, it is quite smart to offer a simple product line, but I believe Apple takes it way too far. There's room in their lineup for one at least more Mac - the midrange tower.
Let's look at this from the perspective of a savvy potential PC->Mac switcher. Your choices for a desktop Mac include:
1. Mac Mini.
2. iMac.
3. Mac Pro.
Keeping our potential switcher in mind...
1. Essentially a headless laptop. Weak, out of date, and surprisingly expensive. Made for people whose needs don't exceed email and web surfing or maybe a cheap file server. Not going to appeal to the more savvy PC users.
2. An all-in-one. Our savvy switchers very well might have a nice LCD which they want to bring to their Mac, so this won't do. Also, it lacks a video input, so you won't be connecting your PC, PS3, or 360 to it.
3. Mac Pro - not overpriced considering what you get, but it's very expensive and more powerful than what most people would ever need.
Assuming you have your own monitor or don't otherwise want an all-in-one, where does that leave you? There's a $1500 price difference between the most expensive Mini and the least expensive Pro - and that difference reflects a ridiculously large gap in performance.
I think Apple should condense the Mini into one SKU and drop the 4-core Mac Pro, leaving ample room for a 4-core minitower at maybe $1800. They still get a simple product line and lots of PC and Mac users get a hell of a usable machine. I quite like the iMac, but one-size does not fit all.
BTW, I'm an Apple user since the Apple IIe and I have a budget for a new Mac, but Apple doesn't leave me with much choice - I don't want to buy a Mac Pro because it's more money/power than I want, I don't want an anemic Mini, and I can't use my consoles with an iMac. So it's not just switchers whom Apple is leaving in the cold with their sparse product line. Why can't they at least put an HDCP-capable DVI and/or HDMI input on the iMac?
I'm just waiting for them to add some ridiculously good graphics card. I am gonna be so pissed if they do.![]()
I mostly agree, but I don't wouldn't call Apple's simplified product line pointless. On some level, it is quite smart to offer a simple product line, but I believe Apple takes it way too far. There's room in their lineup for one at least more Mac - the midrange tower.
Let's look at this from the perspective of a savvy potential PC->Mac switcher. Your choices for a desktop Mac include:
1. Mac Mini.
2. iMac.
3. Mac Pro.
Keeping our potential switcher in mind...
1. Essentially a headless laptop. Weak, out of date, and surprisingly expensive. Made for people whose needs don't exceed email and web surfing or maybe a cheap file server. Not going to appeal to the more savvy PC users.
2. An all-in-one. Our savvy switchers very well might have a nice LCD which they want to bring to their Mac, so this won't do. Also, it lacks a video input, so you won't be connecting your PC, PS3, or 360 to it.
3. Mac Pro - not overpriced considering what you get, but it's very expensive and more powerful than what most people would ever need.
Assuming you have your own monitor or don't otherwise want an all-in-one, where does that leave you? There's a $1500 price difference between the most expensive Mini and the least expensive Pro - and that difference reflects a ridiculously large gap in performance.
I think Apple should condense the Mini into one SKU and drop the 4-core Mac Pro, leaving ample room for a 4-core minitower at maybe $1800. They still get a simple product line and lots of PC and Mac users get a hell of a usable machine. I quite like the iMac, but one-size does not fit all.
BTW, I'm an Apple user since the Apple IIe and I have a budget for a new Mac, but Apple doesn't leave me with much choice - I don't want to buy a Mac Pro because it's more money/power than I want, I don't want an anemic Mini, and I can't use my consoles with an iMac. So it's not just switchers whom Apple is leaving in the cold with their sparse product line. Why can't they at least put an HDCP-capable DVI and/or HDMI input on the iMac?
Price drop for iMac in Spain!!!
And wireless mouse and keyboard for free!
http://www.fnac.es/dsp/?servlet=tree.HomeEspecialesServlet&tree=8&especial=apple_vida&page=1
Not to mention a simple fact:
next Tuesday is the anniversary of the FIRST iMac EVER!!! It's OBVIOUS that an update will be introduced!!!![]()
I believe that the aniversary is August 15th
next Tuesday is the anniversary of the FIRST iMac EVER!!! It's OBVIOUS that an update will be introduced!!!![]()
Nope.
i still believe it's going to be quite a major and unexpected upgrade.. it's in less than 100 hours, let's see!!!
What kind of major upgrade are you expecting? Quad-Core is not ready yet. And if there is a case redesign, they will debut it at an Apple Event, like always.
All signs point to a mediocre, but welcome update. The only way something great will happen is if Apple was able to persuade Intel to let them have Montevina early.
Unfortunately the EyeTV doesn't support 1080p and that's half the reason I want a 24" monitor - to play my console games in full HD. Apple's way-out-of-date ACDs not only lack the second input, but also lack HDCP support.
It's like SJ hates gamers - the Mac is a lousy gaming platform and he'll do nothing to accommodate those who wish to supplement their Mac experience with a gaming console.
i still believe it's going to be quite a major and unexpected upgrade.. it's in less than 100 hours, let's see!!!
Not to mention a simple fact:
next Tuesday is the anniversary of the FIRST iMac EVER!!! It's OBVIOUS that an update will be introduced!!!![]()
I believe that the aniversary is August 15th