Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If I’m wrong about this I apologise, but I don’t believe that Apple raised their prices with the tariffs. Which would mean apple just got the money back it payed to the US government.
You are correct. However, much like any other halfway intelligent company faced with the tariffs, Apple is no saint but really good at business. They were smart enough to negotiate with the Trump regime to get exemptions and exclusions for their most profitable products from the tariffs. They also shifted their supply chain to other countries for manufacturing to avoid the highest tariffs. And they absorbed the cost of the tariffs on their low-volume products, to which they received their 2.2 billion refund from the court ruling that the Tariffs were deemed illegal, thanks to the US tax payer. In the end, our taxes paid for the tariffs in some or fashion. But hey, Apple came out without losing money, am I right?
 
Have you been living under a rock?

Go check the SSD and RAM prices

AI centers have made everything skyrocket
No, I know about the DATA centers.
Though it does not justify a 40% increase, and having baseline RAM at ridiculously levels 256 and 512 as if it is a Phone...
Apple always did this marketing tactics in the past, but this is just a pathetic Joke of bad taste, especially considering like you cannot update neither the RAM nor the internal SSD like int he old days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stormshadow
Question for any fellow web designers around here (but anyone can chime in):

I'm planning on getting a Mac mini M5 Pro and a Studio Display.

I'm on a 27 inch 2020 iMac that currently has 64 GB of RAM. If I upgrade to the M5 Pro mini, should I still get 64 GB or would 48 be sufficient?

I usually have these open at all times: Safari and Chrome (multiple tabs and windows for both), Messages, WhatsApp, Discord, Music, Photoshop, Figma, and Nova.

Currently, I have zero problems with 64GB for this situation. Everything is nice and smooth and I'd like it to stay that way of course. I'm using iStat pro and it currently shows the memory pressure varying usually from 17% and 22%. With an average memory usage of 70-80%. I realize that percentage would be more than 48GB, but does Apple Silicon perform the same (or better) performance anyway?
You will be 100% fine. The leap from Intel to M5 Pro is going to rock your world 🫨

Edit: Speaking from experience, I got a MacBook Pro with M5P, 64gb ram – heavy in Adobe, with After Effects and DaVinci and iStat has barely notched, apart from intensive video conversions. Even rendering flies. I’m pretty sure I could have gotten 48 and been fine, even being more video focused.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RoboCop001
RAM costs must make up a big chunk of these prices.
Not really. It's just a cloak to hide behind.
Before any of the chip price hikes Apple were making 800% to 1000% markup on ram/ssd components.
Yes, the chips have gone up a lot but if Apple dropped their markup down to 100% - to 200% the machines would barely need to go up (from their original prices) by any more than £50 and they'd still be making a killing.
Completely unjustified hikes.
 
$500 because of RAM prices? Yeah, no, absolutely not. Apple disgusts me. They've always been greedy but they're breaking some new barriers. They no longer get to say they care about anyone or anything other than capitalism and cash.
 
My 2022 M1 Max Studio base has pretty much the same specs as the new M5 model with a processor update, but costs $500 more. I wanted to upgrade, but for what you get for the price, it's just not worth it. I don't blame Apple for there only being two main companies who produce memory/ram and the supply being constrained by mass orders for AI usage, which has caused the price increases. It just sucks for all of us.

All of my recent posts here include this, and it applies here as well: Screw AI.
Same. My M1 Max Macbook Pro is due for an upgrade and I was looking at the Mac Studio... but not anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jeffme
If everything costs a lot, nothing in comparison is ultra expensive.
I'm thinking at Vision Pro, iPhone Fold, MBP touch etc.

I would't be surprised if this was a strategy to make other until-very-recently-extremely-expensive-devices look almost affordable.
Same with the staggered iPhones 18 rollout. Suddenly the Pro/Pro Max become the “cheap” option(s), despite their own price increases

Pretty smart in a diabolical sort of way
 
$500 because of RAM prices? Yeah, no, absolutely not. Apple disgusts me. They've always been greedy but they're breaking some new barriers. They no longer get to say they care about anyone or anything other than capitalism and cash.

It's not just RAM. It's SSDs. It's processors. Every single component has gone way up. SSDs are so expensive now that people who buy SK hynix or Samsung SSDs and have them fail under warranty are being given refunds instead of replacements because the replacements are two to three times what they paid. The capacity to make the processors is so limited that they are having to out bid other companies like Nvidia and Qualcomm (who is raising the prices on their SOCs on 9/1) to get bookings to make the processors, and those can't be completed without the RAM since it is on the SOC. The helium used to make the processors is extremely constrained because of the war with Iran since Qatar makes almost a third of the world supply, which then made China stop exports of it to protect their supply. The plastic used to make this stuff is also constrained. All of that adds up to a seriously messed up situation all around.
 
I'm still not completely sure how M5 Pro competes with M6. I'm not sure one's 100% better than the other, so this is an odd iteration IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loki23
You will be 100% fine. The leap from Intel to M5 Pro is going to rock your world 🫨

Edit: Speaking from experience, I got a MacBook Pro with M5P, 64gb ram – heavy in Adobe, with After Effects and DaVinci and iStat has barely notched, apart from intensive video conversions. Even rendering flies. I’m pretty sure I could have gotten 48 and been fine, even being more video focused.
Thanks for your insight! This is good to know. Especially considering video work would be a lot more resource intensive.
 
Just look at Wall Street and you know this was always gonna happen, right?
Of course Apple could eat the cost. Hell, at Apple’s scale, they could probably take negative margins for a while during a chip capacity expansion and still be totally fine.
But they can’t. And the answer is Wall Street. Good old Wall Street, America’s favorite thing.
Intel almost got killed by this exact game. There’s no way Apple’s gonna let that happen to them. Imagine Wall Street suddenly deciding Apple deserves the same P/E as some “regular manufacturer.” Oops, there goes a massive chunk of the market cap. What’s Apple supposed to do with that kind of embarrassment?
So yeah, here we are. Everybody gets to welcome the price hike with open arms. And don’t forget to be grateful for it too.
(Micron: “Well… we told you. It’s that big customer’s fault. Don’t come blaming us for the price hikes.”)
 
$500 because of RAM prices? Yeah, no, absolutely not. Apple disgusts me. They've always been greedy but they're breaking some new barriers. They no longer get to say they care about anyone or anything other than capitalism and cash.
You must not track RAM or storage prices due to the AI buildout. You think Apple wants this kind of price hikes? I think not. But it's comfortable to fall back on conspiracy-level logic. They are not going to swallow the insane price hikes from the memory manufacturers. Wait if you can. This bubble will burst eventually. I'm going to have a big resentment over what these memory companies are doing to consumers in favor of their corporate clients. For anyone who follows the industry, they are creating generational bad will.
 
I have my trusty M1 mac Mini 8/512 and M4 Air 15 inch 16/512 which work both impeccable so I am loaded. The price rise is inevitable in this world, so I hope that both my devices will work for foreseeable future well. I also have no intent to upgrade my Ultra 2 apple watch and my 17 Air iphone.
 
my m1 max studio: you don't need it. you don't need it. I'm still good.
I unfortunately just spilled a coffee on my M1 Max Studio. I brought it to Apple and they said since it was BTO it’d likely cost more than a new one. I’m heartbroken. It was such a beast of a machine.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: jouster
Let's all remember Apple received 2.5 Billion in Tariff refunds that we paid for, only to raise prices anyway.
Not defending the increases from a company that makes billions, but they did not raise prices until after the tariffs were struck down. They were one of the few companies that ate those costs, so they aren’t taking our tariff money. This is AI related inflation of Storage and RAM
 
Genlock!? This is HUGE for video production! How you found the equivalent of an understated footnote on Apple’s press release (vs anywhere on their website product tech specs) is why you guys are the BEST!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yza
The starting price for there Mini is ridiculous, Apple is devolving not evolving
Not a great way to start off a new CEO's tenure.
 
$1249 CAD. For 256GB of storage. 2026. W T F.

So this is the AI slop bailout?!? What timeline am I living in!? What is is this insanity!!!

elmo fire.gif
 
Might be time for the 2026 board to go back and review the changes that Steve Jobs brought with the new board. Bill Campbell and Gareth Chang had some good points there.

 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.