Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You can build a PC and get much more performance for the same price as the M2 Ultra Mac Studio. Frankly, Apple Silicon on desktop makes no sense because performance per watt is of no concern. Who are Mac Studio's and the upcoming Mac Pro for? Apple can't compete with nVidia, AMD and Intel on desktop systems. Buying Apple desktop hardware is throwing away money.
Couldn't disagree more, changed from a brutal self build PC to a Mac Studio and save over $3000.- a year in electricity with very similar performance. The machine pays for itself in 2 years and is pure profit every year after this. Buying an Apple desktop is free money and without the hassle of owning anything windows based. My big macho brag Pc has been sitting next to the mac studio, untouched from day 2 of getting the Studio.
 
I always love these comments. It's total BS. I have had as many as six PC towers in my office running at the same time 2 or 3 at full honk and the room never went up a degree.
Right. It couldn't possibly be more complicated than "turn on PC - room get hot" so all of science must be BS.

If you want to play anecdotal evidence, I once had to buy a portable A/C when I was running a couple of PC towers in a bedroom and I know people who have measured the temperature in their home office at several degrees above the rest of their house when their PCs are running. Or maybe, just maybe, there may be something to these "laws of physics" things.

Whether you like it or not, six PC towers will be putting out at least as much heat as a small plug-in electric heater. You know: the sort that would be useless in a huge, draughty room but enough to turn a smaller room into an oven.

That and the whole question of whether your room is thermostatically heated or air conditioned - in which case adding a heat source is going to make your heating run less - or your A/C run more - before it starts affecting the temperature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adult80HD
Couldn't disagree more, changed from a brutal self build PC to a Mac Studio and save over $3000.- a year in electricity with very similar performance.
It's a very valid point that the annual energy cost of running a computer can now be a significant part of the "total cost of ownership" (probably always been true, but rising energy costs vs. 500W PC GPUs have bought it home) and Apple Silicon Macs win big on power consumption.

I'd just point out, though, that even if you need the sort of high-end GPU power you can get in a tower PC (and which Apple Silicon struggles to match) you don't need to run that 24/7. If your super-gaming-workstation PC is using $3000 worth of electricity a year then its worth paying for a laptop or Mini PC to use as your daily driver. There's a lot of Mini PCs around now, and while they're not quite as power-frugal as a Mac Mini they're a lot better than an old-school tower PC and very capable.

That's where the price comparisons get sticky - I see plenty of Ryzen 7 Mini-PCs for around £500. OK, the first impression is "the Mac Mini doesn't cost much more and makes this look like a noisy bucket of spare parts with a fugly great power brick" - but then you look at the specs and see that the PC comes with 32GB RAM, 500GB of SSD and can be upgraded with regular SO-DIMMs and M.2 sticks, and pretty soon the comparable £600 Mac Mini you want has doubled in price, while the power difference is more like £50/year for the Mac vs. £150/year for the Mini PC. Plus, if you really did want a day-to-day web browser/wordprocessor/casual gaming/file server then there are much cheaper, down to £200, Mini PC options which might not bear comparison with the Mac Mini but will get the job done.
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Like
Reactions: Biro
I always love these comments. It's total BS. I have had as many as six PC towers in my office running at the same time 2 or 3 at full honk and the room never went up a degree. I think the people who claim this are doing it wrong and pouring gas on the pcs and lighting them on fire or something.
If I read your comments right, your response is in agreement with my post you responded?
 
It seems the PC vs Studio thing varies on use case with respect to power consumption. I built a hackintosh a few years ago and that idles at around 70-100W, cranked its more like 500. In my experience, a lot of people leave minis and studios running 24/7 so those idle power draws add up substantially. Having a PC on for a few hours a nice to game or whatever is a very different use case, which is where I suspect the conflict comes in.

Also, anyone who thinks a PC doesn't heat up a room should either consult the laws of thermodynamics or monitor the draw on their AC. My office (~40 people) needed an extra 5000W of cooling on the AC because the loop wasn't designed for developers and was hitting 40C in the summer.
 
I always love these comments. It's total BS. I have had as many as six PC towers in my office running at the same time 2 or 3 at full honk and the room never went up a degree. I think the people who claim this are doing it wrong and pouring gas on the pcs and lighting them on fire or something.
Lol you can't be serious. Yes a 1000 watt PC will heat up a room. Maybe your ventilation and/or air conditioning is making you not notice it, but... I assure you, heat will heat up a room. lol.
 
In my experience, a lot of people leave minis and studios running 24/7 so those idle power draws add up substantially.
A year or so back I debated whether to keep my home server/PVR running or leave the Studio running instead. When I measured, my M1 Max Studio idled at 15W which worked out at a bit over £40/yr if it was left 24/7.

The Celeron-based HP home server used 23W with just the system SSD*) and an older PC built around a mobile-class i7 (27W with just the system SSD). Both of those were always designed as low-power systems to be left on continually. So, yes, the Studio is significantly lighter on power but it ain't gonna pay for itself any time soon!

* The usual complement of 3x4TB hard drives added 12W - but I'd need to add something like that to whatever system I used as a home server.

The practical upshot was to say "neither" and whittle the files I actually needed always online down to fit on a single SSD hooked to a Raspberry Pi that pulls under 4W and still does the PVR stuff.

Having a PC on for a few hours a nice to game or whatever is a very different use case, which is where I suspect the conflict comes in.
However, if you're using a PC for home working (or are just a computing/gaming junkie) it can easily be on for 8-10 hours a day and the difference between a 100-500W PC and a 15-60W Studio can still add up - but, as I said in an earlier post, thats partly why laptops and Mini PCs with laptop-class processors are getting popular.
 
A year or so back I debated whether to keep my home server/PVR running or leave the Studio running instead. When I measured, my M1 Max Studio idled at 15W which worked out at a bit over £40/yr if it was left 24/7.

The Celeron-based HP home server used 23W with just the system SSD*) and an older PC built around a mobile-class i7 (27W with just the system SSD). Both of those were always designed as low-power systems to be left on continually. So, yes, the Studio is significantly lighter on power but it ain't gonna pay for itself any time soon!

* The usual complement of 3x4TB hard drives added 12W - but I'd need to add something like that to whatever system I used as a home server.

The practical upshot was to say "neither" and whittle the files I actually needed always online down to fit on a single SSD hooked to a Raspberry Pi that pulls under 4W and still does the PVR stuff.

That's a really practical solution, and you're dead right on them not paying for themselves. Power consumption is only part of the equation. I made the decision to use a smart plug and auto-boot my hackintosh whenever I need it to do some heavy lifting. I've got an ancient mini running as well, but that is in need of replacement so I'm hoping for a new Studio tomorrow as the price/performance/RAM limitations on the Mini doesn't add up for me. That will probably render the Hackintosh a side project though.

However, if you're using a PC for home working (or are just a computing/gaming junkie) it can easily be on for 8-10 hours a day and the difference between a 100-500W PC and a 15-60W Studio can still add up - but, as I said in an earlier post, thats partly why laptops and Mini PCs with laptop-class processors are getting popular.
Completely agree, although if I was doing heavy compute from home I'd be asking for either a contribution to my electricity bill or them to pay for Azure/AWS etc. For the gamers, those running AAA titles aren't really the market for Macs in general. I do some light gaming, but I'd use the Windows install on my hackintosh for anything more serious. Even the same games are noticeably faster due to DirectX getting more attention.

There'll always be an edge case for someone though.
 
Tell me why ?

I want to compare the best thing Apple has to offer in a desktop computer vs the best thing a PC has to offer in a desktop computer. Apples to Apples.
Because you should compare it whatever best iGPU the competition can offer? Otherwise you might as well compare it to any random computer on the planet and whine that it doesn't have 10.000 CPUs. It is just as “apples to apples” as what you are doing, ie. Two random things that goes in a computer.
 
Because you should compare it whatever best iGPU the competition can offer? Otherwise you might as well compare it to any random computer on the planet and whine that it doesn't have 10.000 CPUs. It is just as “apples to apples” as what you are doing, ie. Two random things that goes in a computer.
Ok. I'll continue to think I should be able to compare the best Mac GPU against the best PC GPU.

Let's agree to disagree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Algr
Because you should compare it whatever best iGPU the competition can offer? Otherwise you might as well compare it to any random computer on the planet and whine that it doesn't have 10.000 CPUs. It is just as “apples to apples” as what you are doing, ie. Two random things that goes in a computer.

Except that Apple doesn't let you use a dGPU — internally or even externally — with a Mac, so whatever GPU the Mac Studio has happens to be the highest end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Algr
If it's "just" a speed boost by moving from M1 to M2, I wonder why it took Apple so long. Not that I complain about the upgrade, I just don't understand why switching CPU takes Apple so long. Is it a production chain limitation ?
Took them a while to fix the noise issue.
 
I’m looking forward to seeing if the GPU scaling on a M2 Ultra is better than the M1 Ultra… If it is then the M2 Ultra is going to be a significant upgrade…

I didn’t buy an M1 Ultra MS because I wanted to see what Apple did with the Mac Pro… Now we have the possibility of a M2 Ultra MS and still no sign of the Mac Pro…

I reckon a M2 Ultra Mac Studio might be coming my way very soon, just look at the increases the M2 Pro and M2 Max gave us over the M1 Pro and M1 Max … I’d love to be able to wait for a M3 Extreme Mac Pro but who knows when that’ll arrive, if ever… I’d love a M3 Ultra Mac Studio… but very real truth is that a M3 Ultra Mac Studio is 15-18 months away
 
  • Like
Reactions: spaz8
Lol you can't be serious. Yes a 1000 watt PC will heat up a room. Maybe your ventilation and/or air conditioning is making you not notice it, but... I assure you, heat will heat up a room. lol.
It's not using 1000w constantly. LOL! I had many pcs in my office at once running, NO ac/etc. The temps did not rise one degree. Again...I can assure you, my room temps did not rise.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Adult80HD
It's not using 1000w constantly. LOL! I had many pcs in my office at once running, NO ac/etc. The temps did not rise one degree. Again...I can assure you, my room temps did not rise.
If your PCs are running at literal room temp then you have been under-utlizing their computing power, or they are equipped with aggressively active cooling.

If they are running above room temp but your room passively cools itself without AC then it means the room is naturally well ventilated or well designed, the temp increase does happen but immediately being dispensed.

If none of the above is true for your case, perhaps your location is relatively cooler than the other people's location in this discussion.

PC towers generating heat that needs to be dealt with is well understood if not standard industry practices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: filmak
Lol you can't be serious. Yes a 1000 watt PC will heat up a room.
The important point is that - unless your "room" is a thermally isolated uniform block of aluminium - adding heat doesn't always mean "significantly raise the ambient temperature". In reality its affected by many different factors. 1000W will turn a small, well-insulated room into an oven but it probably won't be noticeable in a large, high-ceilinged room.

t's not using 1000w constantly. LOL!
That depends whether you're spending 8 hours a day playing Solitaire or spending 8 hours a day playing Crysis doing 3D rendering, 4k video editing etc. If its the first of those then you've seriously over-specified your. PCs.

NO ac/etc. The temps did not rise one degree. Again...I can assure you, my room temps did not rise.
So how big is the office? How high is the ceiling? What are the walls and floors made of? Are the windows double-glazed? Are they open? What's the outside temperature? Is their really no thermostatically controlled heating (which will run less if something else is putting out heat)? If you wanted to heat the room how much use do you think a 1kW heater would be?

You can't just say "hey, I can't see that from where I'm sitting right now so its all BS".
 
Now, that would be one of them there "straw man" arguments...
Sure thing. Logic eludes you. got it. Hey, I am not ******** on your magical studio. I am waiting for a new Pro to be released. But I do use logic and common sense while discussing stuff. Unlike yourself where you claim my single pc tower turns my office into an inferno whenever it's on. Again, No "straw man" arguments here. I understand your arguing though...GOT IT!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: theluggage
Completely agree, although if I was doing heavy compute from home I'd be asking for either a contribution to my electricity bill or them to pay for Azure/AWS etc.
...and the latter is one reason why relatively powerful personal workstations like the 2019 Mac Pro might be becoming a thing of the past. Once broadband connections are good enough (and, in many cases, its the server than needs the fast internet connection to other online data sources, not the user) you can rent more power online as and when you need it, and cloud service providers can build their data centres next to a hydro-electric dam in Alaska for cheap power and cooling.
 
Mhhhhhhh sitting on a 2019 mac pro becomes more and more frustrating :D
Have you upgraded anything internally on the Mac Pro? I'm genuinely curious if Apple will ever release an updated full sized tower.

Adding the ability to upgrade RAM (😆), 2x-4x NVME proprietary slots and expansion via TB is all that's needed for most these days.
 
Have you upgraded anything internally on the Mac Pro? I'm genuinely curious if Apple will ever release an updated full sized tower.

Adding the ability to upgrade RAM (😆), 2x-4x NVME proprietary slots and expansion via TB is all that's needed for most these days.
I highly doubt they will release anything upgradable. goes against what the bean counters want.
 
I use to run a PC I built that had 6 fans and a top of the line graphics card, when I switched to the 24" iMac I noticed a drop in my electric bill for sure, it was a complete surprise, never thougth about the heat, I'm sure it added something since I felt the warm air when it would ramp up. I have really good hearing so I guess I was use to the low background noise and without it, even watching TV or listning to music, I noticed the difference, it was strange without the hum of those fans, very strange.

Pretty soon even high end computers with fans or water cooling will be history. Computers will mostly disapear into the background of life and be everywhere, kids will say you had a computer in a box on the floor? with fans in it!
 
It's not using 1000w constantly. LOL! I had many pcs in my office at once running, NO ac/etc. The temps did not rise one degree. Again...I can assure you, my room temps did not rise.
There's no point in arguing about this. You obviously don't understand how heat works.

But, I can assure you that my i7-13700K heats this room up so much I had to close vents elsewhere in the house to redirect more A/C here.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.