You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. When you go to YouTube and Flash is not installed it tells you to download and install the Flash plugin and gives you a link to download it.
Bad precedent Apple, bad precedent. Now users gotta install more stuff, just to get a working OS, it's looking more and more like Windows every day.
Bad precedent Apple, bad precedent. Now users gotta install more stuff, just to get a working OS, it's looking more and more like Windows every day.
Bad precedent Apple, bad precedent. Now users gotta install more stuff, just to get a working OS, it's looking more and more like Windows every day.
Every facebook user ever.
Ummm ever been to YouTube?
Adobe released its new Flash Player 10.1 just five days before Apple pushed Mac OS X 10.6.4 to the public, and, as is frequently the case, Apple chose not to include the new version in the OS update without having time to perform sufficient testing.
Youre one of those guys that defend Apple no matter what. I usually skip over your posts since you dont really add anything to any discussion, just the same point of view, but you quoted me.
The article says that Safari, unlike other browser, doesnt give you the option to click and install when the user comes across flash. Thats usually set by default by the browser. If youtube gives their own link, I dont know, but if they do, my point still stands for all of the other flash sites out there. It would be really in convenient for all of those non computer savvy people out there, who couldnt care less about Apple vs Adobe. It would be really inconvenient for them for Safari not to give them the option of click to install. But Im sure youre going to defend Apple and say that all of the websites out there should modify their sites to do something that the browser normally does.
I know the Apple vs Flash "struggle" seems more newsworthy, but I think one would be REMISS by not mentioning that Apple has been stung in the past for not keeping up with Adobe Flash security updates when including it in its releases.
This was June of this year:
https://www.macrumors.com/2010/06/17/adobe-mac-os-x-10-6-4-carries-outdated-flash-player/
With Flash security issues cropping up at any time, this was the original reason Apple stopped updating Flash support in Quicktime. By not including Flash in the default install for MacBook Air, Apple is not making itself responsible for issues related to Adobe and its software.
Yes, its convenient to have it preinstalled, but its not unreasonable for Apple to avoid "problems" by having the user go directly to the vendor. I'm pretty sure Apple has enough balls to juggle right now without retesting for a zero-day vulnerability a week before releasing a critical new product.
~ CB
Fine by me. I'll just use Chrome to do my online homework.
And remember last year, when Apple shipping Snow Leopard, it DOWNGRADED the version of Flash installed on people's computers, and a security firm derided them for it. I don't think they WIN for micromanaging other vendor's security problems. Java is MORE of a core web browsing asset and Windows doesn't ship with it anymore last time I checked, and Apple is already being forced (almost same day) to release security updates for it.I had forgotten about that little storm. I would guess this may have more to do with that than anything else.
Two Java updates have meanwhile been posted for Leopard and Snow Leopard. The Snow Leopard update, Update 2, is a 78MB download that upgrades Jave SE 6 to v1.6.0_20. Aside from compatibility and reliability fixes, it also deals with multiple security holes, found in the Java sandbox, the handling of Mach RPC messages, and applet window bounds.
Even the most basic end users know how to install Flash. It's not like something really important/crucial to the OS. I think Flash doesn't run well, therefore Apple doesn't ship it on weaker machines such as the MBA. It doesn't run well on anything.
This shows that Apple doesn't care about its users' experience as much as it hates Adobe. It is really counterintuitive and childish to take such positions as this. Apple can hate Adobe, but it needs to respect its users and the unbelievable saturation Flash has on the Internet.
I would respect Apple more if it would stop the nonsense and get to business. Don't like Adobe, then beat them in the business. I always say give me the very best the competition has to give, and that's what I want to beat. Apple would look better if it took this stance with Adobe. SAD move on Apple's behalf.