Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. When you go to YouTube and Flash is not installed it tells you to download and install the Flash plugin and gives you a link to download it.

You’re one of those guys that defend Apple no matter what. I usually skip over your posts since you don’t really add anything to any discussion, just the same point of view, but you quoted me.

The article says that Safari, unlike other browser, doesn’t give you the option to click and install when the user comes across flash. That’s usually set by default by the browser. If youtube gives their own link, I don’t know, but if they do, my point still stands for all of the other flash sites out there. It would be really in convenient for all of those non computer savvy people out there, who couldn’t care less about Apple vs Adobe. It would be really inconvenient for them for Safari not to give them the option of click to install. But I’m sure you’re going to defend Apple and say that all of the websites out there should modify their sites to do something that the browser normally does.
 
Yeah...sure....

If that's reason enough for you to switch to Windows, all I can is WOW. Didn't take much. And I have to agree, if you consider Flash important to the OS of the computer you use (The OS?!?! WTF?) then I guess Apple really blew it. I mean, expecting a person who buys an Air to actually go and download the latest version of the cra**y software is probably too much to expect. I mean, they just bought a system with no optical media drive and SSD. I'm sure the next most important thing is if it runs Flash. Just think of all the knock-off games on movie promotion sites you will be missing! Or the same games repurposed on breakfast cereal sites. Or the same games repurposed on soda sites...ETC.
Bad precedent Apple, bad precedent. Now users gotta install more stuff, just to get a working OS, it's looking more and more like Windows every day.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_0_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8A306)

Come on. This belongs on the front page? Who gives a crap! Install it if you need it.
 
Shipping a computer without Flash pre-installed isn't that big deal. However, if that news picture is correct, Safari doesn't show any kind of information about the missing plug-in. No plug-in name, no link to a download site, nothing. That's really confusing for most users, who don't know what plug-in might be missing and where to get it.
 
Every facebook user ever.

Ummm ever been to YouTube?

I know both of these have been picked over already, but I want another go.

Not once have I ran into a situation where anything on facebook ever required the use of flash. Maybe it's just me, but I don't do stupid, time wasting activities. I do however use it for genuine social networking with real friends.

As for YouTube, the ClickToFlash Safari extension works pretty well in bringing me flashless video. I love that I can download videos with one click and that it blocks ads and gets me to the actual video 100% of the time. I'm looking at you Vevo. Also works great on those popup things that people put into their videos that exceedingly rarely enhance the video. ClickToFlash is able to display ~99.9% of the videos I watch, your mileage may vary in that regard. 99.9% + extra credit for blocking ads seems like a winner to me.
 
I know the Apple vs Flash "struggle" seems more newsworthy, but I think one would be REMISS by not mentioning that Apple has been stung in the past for not keeping up with Adobe Flash security updates when including it in its releases.

This was June of this year:
https://www.macrumors.com/2010/06/17/adobe-mac-os-x-10-6-4-carries-outdated-flash-player/
Adobe released its new Flash Player 10.1 just five days before Apple pushed Mac OS X 10.6.4 to the public, and, as is frequently the case, Apple chose not to include the new version in the OS update without having time to perform sufficient testing.

With Flash security issues cropping up at any time, this was the original reason Apple stopped updating Flash support in Quicktime. By not including Flash in the default install for MacBook Air, Apple is not making itself responsible for issues related to Adobe and its software.

Yes, its convenient to have it preinstalled, but its not unreasonable for Apple to avoid "problems" by having the user go directly to the vendor. I'm pretty sure Apple has enough balls to juggle right now without retesting for a zero-day vulnerability a week before releasing a critical new product.

~ CB
 
Or they just don't install it....

That is the other option you don't consider in your post. People just don't bother to go and install it. And as they may know nothing of the Abode and Apple disagreements, I guess they just figure they don't need it.
And that begs the question, do they? I know if I can't play the games on the breakfast cereal sites I'm a little let down. But it passes.
You’re one of those guys that defend Apple no matter what. I usually skip over your posts since you don’t really add anything to any discussion, just the same point of view, but you quoted me.

The article says that Safari, unlike other browser, doesn’t give you the option to click and install when the user comes across flash. That’s usually set by default by the browser. If youtube gives their own link, I don’t know, but if they do, my point still stands for all of the other flash sites out there. It would be really in convenient for all of those non computer savvy people out there, who couldn’t care less about Apple vs Adobe. It would be really inconvenient for them for Safari not to give them the option of click to install. But I’m sure you’re going to defend Apple and say that all of the websites out there should modify their sites to do something that the browser normally does.
 
Last time Apple shipped Flash it was an out-of-date, insecure version. Why not just leave it to users to install it if they want to? I only use it for Street View anyway, no big loss.
 
Good point

I had forgotten about that little storm. I would guess this may have more to do with that than anything else.
I know the Apple vs Flash "struggle" seems more newsworthy, but I think one would be REMISS by not mentioning that Apple has been stung in the past for not keeping up with Adobe Flash security updates when including it in its releases.

This was June of this year:
https://www.macrumors.com/2010/06/17/adobe-mac-os-x-10-6-4-carries-outdated-flash-player/


With Flash security issues cropping up at any time, this was the original reason Apple stopped updating Flash support in Quicktime. By not including Flash in the default install for MacBook Air, Apple is not making itself responsible for issues related to Adobe and its software.

Yes, its convenient to have it preinstalled, but its not unreasonable for Apple to avoid "problems" by having the user go directly to the vendor. I'm pretty sure Apple has enough balls to juggle right now without retesting for a zero-day vulnerability a week before releasing a critical new product.

~ CB
 
Even the most basic end users know how to install Flash. It's not like something really important/crucial to the OS. I think Flash doesn't run well, therefore Apple doesn't ship it on weaker machines such as the MBA. It doesn't run well on anything.
 
Whatever any political motivations behind Flash's omission, this is a wise security decision, given Flash as a common vector for attack on the web.

If I remember correctly, by the time Snow Leopard had shipped, Adobe had released a patch for a vulnerability, meaning Snow Leopard was shipping with a known Flash exploit, and users weren't even aware Flash was installed, so couldn't know to update it.

This is a wise decision.
 
Will all adobe has to do is make a flash more kinder to apple ios, but adobe didn't want too and there crying foul because Apple said no to flash on the iphone and mac
 
I had forgotten about that little storm. I would guess this may have more to do with that than anything else.
And remember last year, when Apple shipping Snow Leopard, it DOWNGRADED the version of Flash installed on people's computers, and a security firm derided them for it. I don't think they WIN for micromanaging other vendor's security problems. Java is MORE of a core web browsing asset and Windows doesn't ship with it anymore last time I checked, and Apple is already being forced (almost same day) to release security updates for it.

http://www.macnn.com/articles/10/10/20/air.update.comes.on.launch.of.new.hardware/

Two Java updates have meanwhile been posted for Leopard and Snow Leopard. The Snow Leopard update, Update 2, is a 78MB download that upgrades Jave SE 6 to v1.6.0_20. Aside from compatibility and reliability fixes, it also deals with multiple security holes, found in the Java sandbox, the handling of Mach RPC messages, and applet window bounds.

~ CB
 
Even the most basic end users know how to install Flash. It's not like something really important/crucial to the OS. I think Flash doesn't run well, therefore Apple doesn't ship it on weaker machines such as the MBA. It doesn't run well on anything.

How Apple dares to ship MacBook Air without RayV and Veetle. How dare thay.
 
This shows that Apple doesn't care about its users' experience as much as it hates Adobe. It is really counterintuitive and childish to take such positions as this. Apple can hate Adobe, but it needs to respect its users and the unbelievable saturation Flash has on the Internet.

I would respect Apple more if it would stop the nonsense and get to business. Don't like Adobe, then beat them in the business. I always say give me the very best the competition has to give, and that's what I want to beat. Apple would look better if it took this stance with Adobe. SAD move on Apple's behalf.
 
I hope that iOS Lion will block Flash and that Apple won't allow it in the Mac App store! Flash sucks!!!1
 
This shows that Apple doesn't care about its users' experience as much as it hates Adobe. It is really counterintuitive and childish to take such positions as this. Apple can hate Adobe, but it needs to respect its users and the unbelievable saturation Flash has on the Internet.

I would respect Apple more if it would stop the nonsense and get to business. Don't like Adobe, then beat them in the business. I always say give me the very best the competition has to give, and that's what I want to beat. Apple would look better if it took this stance with Adobe. SAD move on Apple's behalf.

It's sad you have it backwards.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)

A bit off topic but does anyone else have problems with flash videos on the BBC sport website. On my iMac it they take forever to play and slows down my entire machine. I'm running the latest version of flash and have 10.6. YouTube etc are fine???
 
WTH??? All the "Flash" or "Adobe" fans, what're u guys talking about?
Can't u just download it from Adobe??

I reckon is fair, if you want it, just download :rolleyes:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.